@High Seas,
Thanks Hi --- that's a first for me --- a lady dedicating a song to me. I appreciate that and will remember it forever.
ehBeth, your Setanta is quite the fellow when it comes to history. I like that. He and the other guy named Sue --- er, Joe (excuse me) have just about covered the subject. I may have a last small posting - but, as far as I can tell after researching all my books, the man in the photo is one of a couple of possibilities: He may be an instructor at a pre-war school for students of an undetermined age and location. Or, he may be in a local voluntary unit of militia. There were many many many units of local militia in those days. They all had their own dress codes to include just plain clothing that everyone wore. And hats!!! My God, you can't count them. Many of the officers had their own uniforms tailor made to their own imaginative design. Oh, well.
I'm sticking with the military school solution - he doesn't have the look of a person who has personally been in the midst of combat. He has the "teacher of cannon fodder" look.
Ahhh, I seriously doubt we will ever know. Unless!!!!!!
We need a clear shot of the emblem on the hat in the photo. I've several of the oval photos from a bit later but close enough that I know the detail of the photos is really sharp in real life. We need a detail of the emblem. As for the jacket -------- well, it's quite obvious to me that the photographer painted it on the man's body. Setanta came up with a close likeness - but, look at the star --- it's right side up on one side and upside down on the other. BUT, if the painter had a single example to go by given to him of course by the man in the photo - he, the photographer who painted it would flip the pattern over and make the photo as we see it today.
That's what I think. Many guys did this in those days in order to flatter themselves.