0
   

Dem voters: Fighting terrorism of little concern.

 
 
Brand X
 
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2003 09:00 am
Full story

Poll link PDF
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 688 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
wolf
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2003 11:31 am
The only way to curtail international terrorism is to reform the CIA. Everybody knows it, only few dare to say it.
0 Replies
 
Beedlesquoink
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2003 08:53 pm
These kinds of polls, numerically ranking concerns are fairly meaningless. When politicians go into full pander they say whatever the audience in front of them demands. Hence, if you recall, Bush was a great environmentlist, and the education president... whatever. Now if you polled Republicans, chances are they would put environment near the bottom of their concerns list... oddly, this might also be true of democrats. Depending on the moment, the news that prevails in the last several weeks, the current flurry of auto-think in the media... whatever makes those lists fluid.

People don't function by way of enumerated concerns. People are not averages. A man who lives by a waste dump whose three children have gotten immune diseases might be an environmentally concerned person. There's a problem in his house, he ranks the entire subject highly. A person seeking a good paying job and not lucking out will have a different priority. Democrat, republican or otherwise, something comes first to that person.

Democrats don't care about terrorism? Well, George Bush is a Republican, but he can't seem to ever come up with as many funds for protecting Americans from terrorism as he can tax breaks for his friends. Where is terrorism on his actual list? Not on his public serving lips, but on the list he keeps that makes him set real world policies? He was the education president... you recall that? But where, really, was that on his list? Getting votes by saying it was high on his list, I suspect.

I'm not a Repub, barely a democrat. Do I rank terrorism as a high concern? Not really, because I think that to do so is to live in reflexive fear. I place creating good will among the world's peoples higher on my list. This trumps terrorism to my way of thinking of it.

Do we live by fear or hope?
0 Replies
 
wolf
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Oct, 2003 11:23 am
By hope, my friend. But it's being tested like never before.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Oct, 2003 04:51 pm
Because the Bush administration has taken the terrorism issue and turned it into a self serving cash cow, and because they are targeting the wrong targets most of the time, Democrats are left out of the loop. Put something rational on the table and there will be Democrat support.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Oct, 2003 05:40 pm
911 Attacks
These were the largest boon to the Neo-cons. They are milking every last drop of blood out of it that they can.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Dem voters: Fighting terrorism of little concern.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/10/2024 at 12:54:22