20
   

You've talked to a friend about A2K ... they're interested ... ..

 
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 02:49 pm
@Robert Gentel,
i never thought of it quite in that way

i assume that more folk (ie family, moms dads grandparents) view others facebook pages, so i try to stay as normal as possible there
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 02:58 pm
@djjd62,
You can obviously rank us all upon some sort of paranoia scale!
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 03:24 pm
@George,
George wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

George wrote:

Region Philbis wrote:

facebook is really where worlds collide, not here...

scarily so
How does that happen ?

How does what happen?
My question was addressing worlds "scarily" colliding.
George
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 03:57 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

George wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

George wrote:

Region Philbis wrote:

facebook is really where worlds collide, not here...

scarily so
How does that happen ?

How does what happen?
My question was addressing worlds "scarily" colliding.

"Are you the same George Stanton who used to . . ."
"Maybe. Who wants to know?"
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 05:58 pm
@msolga,
I feel the same way; I don't feel any constraint now, and if I invited people that have their own views about religion and politics, it may create some discomfort.

I don't worry about a2kers, because most are "old timers" like me, and they know me by my posts and meeting several times during the past years.

0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 06:23 pm
Just peeped in here.
So much I'd like to respond to & no time to do it right now.

No doubt about it, internet forums are a can of worms!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 07:39 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:
Why? Weariness about worlds colliding, which took a day or two to overcome -- by which time the window of opportunity had closed. Now that I look back at it, this weariness looks stupid to me.


Did you perhaps mean wariness, as in being cautious? It's a good point though, that one will behave differently online than one would in real life.
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 07:41 pm
@Setanta,
Yes. I'll ask Santa for a spell-checker.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 07:43 pm
@Thomas,
That wouldn't help, as weariness is a word, too. The code-writing ego geeks haven't yet come up with a context checker . . .
0 Replies
 
George
 
  3  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 09:33 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:

Yes. I'll ask Santa for a spell-checker.

Here's your spell-checker.
http://thehogshead.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/snape_smiling.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Dec, 2009 11:59 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
I 'd be honest n tell him the truth, forthrightly.
I 'd also tell him that on the Internet, I give myself into free, hedonic, abandon
which is not fully consistent with my more reserved demeanor in the real world.


By golly, David, I think you're close to the mark!

(for me, anyway) it's not so much "world's colliding", but being totally free of my everyday dealings in the "real" world. I value that.

msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 12:08 am
@msolga,
(.... though I don't know about the hedonistic abandonment part! Wink Razz )
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 12:41 am
@msolga,
msolga wrote:

Quote:
I 'd be honest n tell him the truth, forthrightly.
I 'd also tell him that on the Internet, I give myself into free, hedonic, abandon
which is not fully consistent with my more reserved demeanor in the real world.


By golly, David, I think you're close to the mark!

(for me, anyway) it's not so much "world's colliding",
but being totally free of my everyday dealings in the "real" world. I value that.


Yes. Cyber David is not the same as Real David.
I 've been informed over dinner by a member of this forum
that she expected me to be loud in my demeanor and that
she was surprized that I have a softspoken bearing in the real world.

(In those days, I made greater use of larger, multicolored fonts than I do now.)





David
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 01:07 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Thing is, David, we're responding to threads, ideas, arguments here. Knocking around our thoughts & views about everything & anything & colliding with others, from time to time.

Now, If I wandered around my "real" world sprouting my thoughts and opinions like this all the time ... well, people might wonder! Wink Razz
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 02:01 am
@msolga,
msolga wrote:

Thing is, David, we're responding to threads, ideas, arguments here.
Knocking around our thoughts & views about everything & anything & colliding with others, from time to time.

Now, If I wandered around my "real" world sprouting my thoughts and opinions like this all the time ... well,
people might wonder! Wink Razz
It is a fact of human nature that sometimes one of us adopts an idea
by which he is intensely possessed and he feels moven to propagate
his thinking about it. For instance, I remember a local fellow about
40 years ago, named Vito Batista who was very devotedly against
rent control in NY. He attracted attention to himself by trailing
a donkey behind him in public, after which he expressed his views against rent control.
Whenever u saw Vito Batista speaking, u knew for sure that he was denouncing rent control.
(I agreed with his opinion, but I was less obsessed with discussing it all the time.)
I kidded him about it; I asked him: "how do u feel about rent control?"

Before June of 2008, I was similarly situate qua supporting every citizen 's right to self defense.
I approved of the advice of Congressman Bob Barr, who said: "never leave any person 's presence
without informing him of where u stand on the right to self defense & the right to keep and bear arms."
I was not 100% about actually DOING that, but I approved of the idea.

Some people are dedicated to spreading their religious opinions,
e.g., a fellow who coud be relied upon to be in a NYC subway,
in the same place every day for years, distributing his paper handouts
(printed at his own expense, with pictures) advocating his religious point of vu.

People who do this present the appearance of being a little nuts,
but are sufficiently motivated to do it regardless. Some guys have fought n died
for their beliefs, e.g., Abe Lincoln, not just spoken about them.





David
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 02:08 am
@OmSigDAVID,
With all due respects, David, this thread was not intended for individual A2Kers to push their particular beliefs on any particular issue/s.

We are straying from the thread topic now.
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 05:18 am
@msolga,
(U just don 't like Vito Batista; I 've always suspected u of that.)
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 05:27 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Laughing

But I hardly even know, Vito, David!


No, no! Don't fill me in on any more details! Google will tell me all I need to know! Wink
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 06:01 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Donkey?


You're clearly in need of something a lot bigger.

Here's a mule for you:

http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/10/03/Mule_061003102658077_wideweb__300x400.jpg
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Dec, 2009 06:03 am
@dlowan,
You'll regret that.
 

Related Topics

How to use the new able2know - Discussion by Craven de Kere
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
I'm the developer - Discussion by Nick Ashley
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
A2K censors tags? - Discussion by hingehead
New A2K Bugs - Discussion by sozobe
New A2K annoyances - Discussion by sozobe
The a2k world is changing 3: about voting - Discussion by Craven de Kere
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Welcome to the 'New' My Posts - Discussion by Nick Ashley
The "I get folksonomy" club - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/09/2024 at 11:27:12