@Ionus,
I'm not saying "all that," you have made a claim, and seem to be unable to support it with any evidence. I have "formal qualification," i majored in history and English literature when i was at university. One the one hand, you sneer at me as "old man," now you want to suggest that i'm a "struggling undergraduate." Apparently, you can't make up your mind. You have no argument to forward, you just sling insults, which i suspect comes from having no support for your claim.
Who cares if you are used to "[your] opinion counting?" If you post something here, and someone challenges it, it's time to put up or shut up. Panzade provided a source to the effect that OSS and MI6 passed on some assassination attempts, but it didn't have anything to do with some paranoid fantasy that Churchill or FDR wanted to prolong the war for their own ends--Panzade's source claimed it was because they didn't trust their German contacts.
Claiming that OSS and MI6 passed on opportunities to assassinate Hitler because someone wanted to prolong the war is an extraordinary claim. Those who make extraordinary claims have the burden of supporting them, or being ignored as unreliable. Get over it, that's real life.
You don't tell me what "the deal" is. I stay or leave as i please. And i have no reason to think your opinion counts in matters which can be proven or disproven by the historical record--something in which opinion is meaningless.