@panzade,
panzade wrote:
Quote:(as, possibly, did Panzade in following your lead),
I only noted that I enjoyed the program we both listened to.
And I am ready for your edification.
Ever since the end of WWI, American diplomacy has moved towards a strong and unified Germany to buffer the Bolshevik menace.
Excepting of course those 4 pesky years of WWII.
France on the other hand has always hoped to keep Germany weak in order to avoid a fourth invasion.
I believe Bush would have been in the unified Germany camp.
Thanks, Panzade - didn't mean to attribute bad faith to you. You're right about George HW Bush supporting German unification, and that it has been a fundamental interest of the US at least since Kennan's "long telegram". As to the years of WWII, Germany wasn't divided, but even then some far-seeing folks (Patton among them) saw a strong Germany as the only effective barrier between Russia and the Atlantic. You are however incorrect in suggesting that France was invaded by Germany "four" times - only in the 19th century, France invaded Germany twice, once under Napoleon and twice (in 1870) under his eventual successor, Napoleon III.
Francis may correct what follows, but I attribute the widespread misconception that Germany always invaded France to the superb PR skills of French diplomacy, whereas the hapless Germans lack PR, marketing, and diplomatic skills to such an extent that they have to use French and English words for all related concepts - there being none in the German language