1
   

Bewitched, Bothered, Billygoated!

 
 
Reply Thu 16 Oct, 2003 04:55 am
From today's New York Times. Deserves to be read and absorbed by everyone:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/16/opinion/16DOWD.html?th

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 758 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Oct, 2003 08:28 am
"puts the casual back in casualty" Shocked
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Oct, 2003 06:07 pm
Can't access the link without being a subscriber. Can you give a synopsis of what it says?

Is this the article I've heard about the congressman who made the comment about the media devoting too much time to reporting about soldier deaths and not enough time reporting about improvements in the roads of Iraq?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Oct, 2003 07:06 pm
From the op-ed piece:
Quote:
Mr. Bush said in interviews that he wanted to "go over the heads of the filter and speak directly with the people" because there was a "sense that people in America aren't getting the truth."

He is right that there has been a filter that has made it hard for Americans ?- and even Congress ?- to get the truth on Iraq, but it isn't the press. It's an administration that comically thinks when it hauls out Dick Cheney to say in his condescending high school principal voice that 2 + 2 = 5, we'll buy it.

The vice president hasn't come up with W.M.D., Osama or Saddam. But he says we have uncovered a video of Saddam letting two Doberman pinchers eat one of his generals alive because he didn't trust him. Oh, that's worth $87 billion, the Iraqi version of "When Good Pets Go Bad."

On Monday, Representative George Nethercutt Jr., a Republican from Washington State who visited Iraq, chimed in to help the White House: "The story of what we've done in the postwar period is remarkable. It is a better and more important story than losing a couple of soldiers every day." The congressman puts the casual back in casualty.

It would be a lot easier to heed good news as well as bad if Bush officials hadn't assured us before we invaded Iraq that there would be no bad.

First they sold the war to trusting Americans with spin, and now they are trying to sell the occupation to skeptical Americans with more spin.

Greg Thielmann, the retired State Department official who was a top analyst for Colin Powell on Iraq's W.M.D., told "60 Minutes II" last night that Iraq had been so far from being an imminent threat that Mr. Powell's speech making that case at the U.N. was "probably one of the low points in his long, distinguished service to the nation."

The Bush team prepared the ground for American doubt; they told us to expect a fairy tale and now resent the fact that we refuse to treat it like one.

The fundamental problem for the Bush administration is that it is endlessly propounding a contradiction: Wanting us to worry that we are battling for our lives against the terrorists, and wanting us to stop worrying about the state of the battle.

Everything is wrong, and nothing is wrong. We are trapped in the Bush illogic. Call it our curse.


0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Oct, 2003 07:53 pm
Thanks Hobitbob. I've been hearing a lot about this on another board. This Congressman thinks it's more important for the news media to be supportive of the Bush administration than to report on attacks on U.S. troops.

President Bush and his administration voice public support for the troops, but at the same time they're cutting back on services for veterans. Bush can land on an aircraft carrier for a photo op, but in the eight months since the invasion of Iraq he's only found time to visit wounded troops on two occasions (although he's managed to make several dozen campaign fundraising dinners and speeches, and collect some US$83 million this year).

Somebody should really talk to those soldiers and tell them to stop getting killed; they're just not a very good story.
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Oct, 2003 05:36 am
Butrflynet said "Somebody should really talk to those soldiers and tell them to stop getting killed; they're just not a very good story."

Two more, today, failed to get your message in time.
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Oct, 2003 07:26 am
Now four dead so far and two more injured. Curious how the seriousness of the injuries always go unmentioned? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Oct, 2003 09:31 am
On one hand, I do agree with the congressman. There is a lot more to the story then just a body count. As you already hinted at, I'd like to know more about the circumstances of the deaths. That goes for all deaths in Ameriraq.

I'd like to know more about what the billions of dollars are being used for and whether any of it is reaching the pockets of the Iraqi citizens in the form of wages and commerce.

I'd like to know why the Bush administration feels there is a filter that prevents any good news about Iraq from being reported, especially since we pay the salaries of all these press secretaries and military media liasons to do exactly that. Why is the Bush administration having such a tough time getting air time on Clear Channel stations so their press secretaries can present all this good news?

Feel free to add to the list of questions you too would like to hear media reports about.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bewitched, Bothered, Billygoated!
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/11/2026 at 06:03:13