4
   

UFOs & Government Cover Up ?

 
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 07:35 am
@spendius,
Actually, this is a lie--the sort of thing one can expect from Spurious. I don't "have" anyone "on ignore." I simply ignore Spurious because he is a puerile, self-centered ****-wit.
oolongteasup
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 07:41 am
@Setanta,
excuse me
he isnt all that banal
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 07:45 am
@oolongteasup,
I SAW An UFO in De4laware once. I knew it was a UFO because, on its starboard it had the letters U F O clearly spelled out.

So There!!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 07:45 am
I beg to differ with you. He's one of the most glaring examples of intellectual masturbatory oral diarrhea whom i have ever encountered
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 07:57 am
@Setanta,
Quote:
He's one of the most glaring examples of intellectual masturbatory oral diarrhea whom i have ever encountered


Out of how many one feels tempted to ask?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 07:59 am
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Quote:
My scientific curiosity is aroused by the ad on this page for "Cheap Gas in Mildenhall"
and I'm wondering if Dave's reference to "American air base in England" triggered its appearence automatically.
My memory is uncertain on that point.


Quote:
Dave-- if you prefer "ruff" to "rough" why not "weyt" to "weight?
Because an e shoud not be perverted into
sounding like an a. It shoud be wate.





David
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 08:11 am
@OmSigDAVID,
why isn't "should" "shud?

Do you pronounce "late" "leight"?

It's an affectation Dave. Admit it. Heresy really from a philosophical point of view.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 03:32 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

why isn't "should" "shud?

Do you pronounce "late" "leight"?

It's an affectation Dave. Admit it. Heresy really from a philosophical point of view.
The only reason for not using shud, Spendius,
is to quiet the near hysteria that I got from it.
MY point was that there is no logical reason to put an L
into wud, cud nor shud.

Some folks believe that spelling it shoud is closer to pronunciation.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 03:34 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

why isn't "should" "shud?

Do you pronounce "late" "leight"?

Quote:
It's an affectation Dave. Admit it.
I deny it.


Quote:
Heresy really from a philosophical point of view.
I never pledged allegiance to defective logic.





David
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 03:34 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
That's because some folks don't understand how the English language works very well.

Learn Spanish, you'll love it

Cycloptichorn
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 03:36 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
David wrote:
Some folks believe that spelling it shoud is closer to pronunciation.


How woud you fonetikaly spel shroud?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 03:59 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

That's because some folks don't understand how the English language works very well.

Learn Spanish, you'll love it

Cycloptichorn
U can drive a car with a flat tire,
but it works better with all 4 of them being round.




David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 04:01 pm
@Francis,
Francis wrote:

David wrote:
Some folks believe that spelling it shoud is closer to pronunciation.


How woud you fonetikaly spel shroud?
That 's pretty good; it matches the sound in OUT.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 04:22 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
or

fought

or

poutine

or

roundworm
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 04:27 pm

In the end, we 'll need fonetic lexicografers
to reason everything out, polish it, and commit it into new fonetic dictionaries.
Children will be tawt from those nu dictionaries.





David
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 04:33 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Nah.. "The duchesses suspender straps were so tawt Gerald closed his eyes" doesn't work for me. "Taut" is much better.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 05:29 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Nah.. "The duchesses suspender straps were so tawt Gerald closed his eyes" doesn't work for me.
"Taut" is much better.
OK; no problem,
but we will still need nu correct dictionaries.
0 Replies
 
north
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Mar, 2013 01:55 pm
I bought the book by Donald Keyhoe , The Flying saucers are real , to quote from this book , Author's Note

" ON APRIL 27, 1949 , the US Air Force Stated :

The mere existence of some yet unidentified flying objects necessitates a constant vigilance on the part of Project ' Saucer ' personnel and on the part of the civilian population.

Answers have been - and will be - drawn from such factors as guided missile research activity , balloons , astronomical phenomena....But there are still question marks.

Possibilities that the saucers are foreign aircraft have also been considered ....But observations based on nuclear power plant research in this country label as ' highly improbable ' the existence on Earth of engines small enough to have powered the saucers.

Intelligent life on Mars....is not impossible but is completely unproven. The possibility of intelligent life on the Planet Venus is not considered completely unreasonable by astronomers.

The saucers are not jokes. Neither are the cause for alarm. "

Interesting , especially the first and last statement by the Air Force
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Take it All - Discussion by McGentrix
Cancelled - Discussion by Brandon9000
John Stewart meets Bill O'Reilly - Discussion by Thomas
Recommend good HBO series? - Discussion by dlowan
BEFORE WE HAD T.V. - Discussion by edgarblythe
What TV shows do you watch? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Orange is the New Black - Discussion by tsarstepan
Odd Premier: Under the Dome - Discussion by edgarblythe
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/24/2019 at 02:44:23