25
   

Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong

 
 
Muarck
 
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 01:43 am
Okay girls and guys what are the pros and cons of the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong? I honestly want to know both in terms of comfort to the wearing and the visual sex appeal what are the opinions of both guys and girls?
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 01:48 am
@Muarck,
Low is far better, in the back it frames the orbs of the buttocks and in the front it gives the tease of maybe getting to see something. The best is using low rise and having a tattoo just above it, or mostly above it.
contrex
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 04:16 am
I think that thongs, low, high or just plain intermediate, are soooo tacky and last year.
CalamityJane
 
  3  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 08:29 am
@contrex,
I agree with contrex - the sexy thing to wear are "cheekies"

http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/6853/picture1bdz.png

ehBeth
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 09:41 am
@contrex,
contrex wrote:
I think that thongs, low, high or just plain intermediate, are soooo tacky and last year.


around here, it's more like last century then last year

thongs were popular 1997 - 1999, pretty much out of favour by 2000/2001 . pretty much tacky trash if someone is still wearing skivvies that are 10 years out of date
contrex
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 11:44 am
@ehBeth,
I always wonder about when they - you know, ride up in the crack, do they get sort of stained?
chai2
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 12:18 pm
@CalamityJane,
they look uncomfortable. I'd be trying to pull them down over my butt all day.

I wore a thong just one time. really uncomfortable.

I'm into feeling comfortable in what I'm wearing. It's not like I'm prancing around showing everyone my panties all day.

If someone else wanted me to wear them, I'd say "after you"
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 12:21 pm
@ehBeth,
In England the thong took off more during the fade phase then in America, and then sales fell below that of America, so culture does matter. However, the thong is here to stay. It looks fabulous on certain women, it is erotically appealing, and it is a solution for panty lines. I think that a lot of thong wearing has always been and will continue to be motivated by women trying to please men, which I am all in favor of.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  2  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 01:08 pm
i love a women in boy/boxer shorts, and a tank top

or better yet commando wearing pajama pants

wait a minute is this a fantasy thread or general information
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 01:53 pm
@chai2,
Believe it or not, chai, these "cheekies" are so comfortable, you don't even
feel that you're wearing them. Even under pants you don't see a thing as
the usual panty lines are absent.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 02:22 pm
I have no desire for a thong. I like other forms of undergarments much better. The cheekys are really hot but come hanky pany I'm going to second the pajama pants in commando form.

Thongs, as I understood, used to be more of a flashy thing. More recently they have been made into a no-panty-line-showing-in-your-black-slacks kind of thing. I know plenty of women who wear them, and I don't think that many of them do it for their guy.

However, I know a few of the same women who use that fact against their boyfriends. They pretend like they don't want to wear it, but would wear it any ways for the panty line thing. It's used to leverage things like taking out trash etc.

Women have the far superior mind when it comes to strategy and agenda. Us guys, don't really stand a chance do we?

T
K
O
contrex
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 02:27 pm
Is there not a danger of "camel toe"?
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 02:58 pm
@Diest TKO,
Quote:
They pretend like they don't want to wear it, but would wear it any ways for the panty line thing. It's used to leverage things like taking out trash etc.


very true, however I am surprised that you can get past your politics and embrace the truth. Bravo!

Quote:
Us guys, don't really stand a chance do we?


Oh please, our poor performance is by choice. This will change, women are quickly tiring of chicken **** men that they can easily manipulate. Most women want their men to be a challenge, at least.
0 Replies
 
Muarck
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 03:30 pm
@hawkeye10,
It's kind of funny I believe Hawkeye10 is actually the only person who really answered the question: Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong, although there was/is a lot of interesting discussion, Hawkeye10 was the only one who discussed the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong.
Muarck
 
  -1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 03:41 pm
@Muarck,
Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong?

Granted the photos I have here are not equivocal, yet all things being equal what's the opinion on low rise verses waist high thongs? Both for sexiness and comfort.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/412vpMjB74L._SS400_.jpg
http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/41mFQNMmhsL.jpg
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 04:32 pm
@Muarck,
Muarck wrote:

It's kind of funny I believe Hawkeye10 is actually the only person who really answered the question: Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong, although there was/is a lot of interesting discussion, Hawkeye10 was the only one who discussed the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong.

you're correct. If I had to choose, it would be the low rise. The high rise is kind of 90's'ish.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 04:45 pm
@Muarck,
Quote:
It's kind of funny I believe Hawkeye10 is actually the only person who really answered the question: Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong, although there was/is a lot of interesting discussion, Hawkeye10 was the only one who discussed the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong.


that happens some what often around here, as everyone else seems to feel the need to throw their moral values around and attempt to bully others into conforming to their proclivities. I take people as they are most of the time, I trust individuals to run their own lives. I see my role is to help others get what they want, and leave judgements about what they want aside........much of the time anyways.

And I am vilified as being immoral as a result.
CalamityJane
 
  3  
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 05:05 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
And I am vilified as being immoral as a result.


Yes, that's why you promote marital rape and other despicable ideas to demean
women.
farmerman
 
  1  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 06:56 am
@contrex,
Quote:
I always wonder about when they - you know, ride up in the crack, do they get sort of stained?


You should always floss your butt once a day
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 09:04 am
@CalamityJane,
Quote:
Yes, that's why you promote marital rape and other despicable ideas to demean
women.


My argument is that the sex laws are not compatible with human sexuality, that the law making process has been hijacked by militant gender political forces who are attempting to use sex law to change human sexuality to meet the fantasy they hold about how men and women should interact. They will fail, and all attempts to make humans act in inhuman ways demeans both men and women.

You keep bitching about my opinion, but I never see you arguing against it.
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/24/2021 at 07:48:17