25
   

Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong

 
 
Gargamel
 
  3  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 09:11 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
It's kind of funny I believe Hawkeye10 is actually the only person who really answered the question: Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong, although there was/is a lot of interesting discussion, Hawkeye10 was the only one who discussed the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong.


that happens some what often around here, as everyone else seems to feel the need to throw their moral values around and attempt to bully others into conforming to their proclivities. I take people as they are most of the time, I trust individuals to run their own lives. I see my role is to help others get what they want, and leave judgements about what they want aside........much of the time anyways.

And I am vilified as being immoral as a result.


Are you really on your high horse after revealing, in your first post, your affinity for the "tramp stamp?"

I'm totally judging you by the way. Seriously.
Muarck
 
  -1  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 10:43 am
@hawkeye10,
Okay this is off topic, but now I'm curious about what this off topic communication is? What did you say about "martial rape". I'm curious because generally a question that is highly offensive, yet no one can rebut is just the obvious yet avoided truth.
Muarck
 
  -1  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 11:08 am
@Gargamel,
You know people are always looked down on for their appreciation of the human form; yet given that we are human should failure to appreciate the human form be some form of denial of our own kind/nature? The human body is beautiful get over your fear of it.
Francis
 
  3  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 11:18 am
Muarck wrote:
What did you say about "martial rape".


Rape during war is often used as a weapon..

Therefore "marital rape" is also used as a weapon in a household war..
0 Replies
 
chai2
 
  1  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 11:25 am
@Gargamel,
Gargamel wrote:


Are you really on your high horse after revealing, in your first post, your affinity for the "tramp stamp?"

I'm totally judging you by the way. Seriously.



oh garg, you are such a tease.

if I look closely, I can almost see the orbs of your buttocks, through the roundness of your pitcher


btw, I always liked the way Forrest Gump said "buttocks"
Gargamel
 
  3  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 11:31 am
@Muarck,
Really? A butterfly tattoo or shitty Ayn Rand quote inked on a girl's back during some spring break boozefest qualifies as "the human form?" Well then, shouldn't you too be afraid of "the human form," considering the alarming statistics suggesting a relationship between girls with lower back tatoos and venerial disease?
0 Replies
 
chai2
 
  2  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 11:41 am
@chai2,

Gargamel wrote:


I'm totally judging you by the way. Seriously.



Being serious here also.

It's always been a red flag to me when someone says "you shouldn't judge me" or "who are you to judge me"

Judging someone is a fine and intelligent thing to do.
It's how we determine who it's safe to be around, and who we need to avoid.

I judge chickenhawk to be a pervert, who loves to degradate women in general.

I judge the way he tries to sway posters who appear to be young, more inexperienced females to believe being degraded is a high form of love.

I judge the way he postures that intelligent, experienced, strong women who are wise to his bullshit as being somehow repressed or just waiting to be shown who's boss.

btw, I really can't believe that anyone even cares what kind of underwear someone else wears.

what a stupid topic.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 12:03 pm
hawkeye10 - I'm not sure what to say here. I wasn't talking about politics. I made a joke about men and women after noting that I don't think thongs are so much sexy as practical anymore (which is ironic IMO). Leave me out of your march.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 02:24 pm
@Muarck,
Muarck wrote:

Okay this is off topic, but now I'm curious about what this off topic communication is? What did you say about "martial rape". I'm curious because generally a question that is highly offensive, yet no one can rebut is just the obvious yet avoided truth.


Why don't you read hawkeye's posts going back a a few months and you'll
get the picture how he sees the role of women and how perverted he is.
spendius
 
  2  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 02:58 pm
@CalamityJane,
There are about 12 channels on our TV which tempt blokes to ring up for a chat at £2 a minute. Every type of thong is displayed on those channels and by flicking through them it is easy to decide which ones are the most aesthetically pleasing. They use different poses than the ones shown on this thread which don't really give a proper idea. The high waist look doesn't get much coverage. If any.

So from an evolutionary perspective I suppose the narrow stringy ones have it cut and dried. We are waiting for the no thong look.
Francis
 
  1  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 03:07 pm
@spendius,
Spendi wrote:
We are waiting for the no thong look.


If you are expecting that from US, you can wait a long time...

Puritanism is fashionable there right now..
spendius
 
  1  
Mon 31 Aug, 2009 04:32 pm
@Francis,
I don't see how they could hold out on a matter as important as that if they bring in a Darwinian scientific approach to biology lessons.

Explain to me if you can Francis how a scientist, dedicated to truth, could possibly defend banning the no thong look.

What Cal doesn't realise is that there are only about 30%, maybe 35%, of women as intelligent and as devastatingly attractive as she is and the others set the standard in a world where most men are not all that concerned about those admittedly special and highly esteemed qualities.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Tue 1 Sep, 2009 12:36 am
Spendi wrote:
Explain to me if you can Francis how a scientist, dedicated to truth, could possibly defend banning the no thong look.


Americans are a people of many contradictions...
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  0  
Tue 1 Sep, 2009 12:47 am
Spendi wrote:
What Cal doesn't realise is that there are only about 30%, maybe 35%, of women as intelligent and as devastatingly attractive as she is

And that's using euphemisms..
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 1 Sep, 2009 09:07 am
@Francis,
The thing is Francis that the ladies who appear on those TV channels I mentioned, and there are a lot of them as it seems we men quickly get bored, are much more instructive of where society is at than all this old-fashioned Agony Aunt self justification.

In the beginning there was but one channel; Babestation. When I spotted it, which was a pure accident, I was mildly surprised. My instincts as a sociologist told me to keep an eye on it which I duly did after coming home from the pub and during the commercial breaks and weather forecasts on Sky News. Would it fold? Not from want of interest but from want of nerve.

Then a second channel appeared: Babestation II. You could flip from one to the other. Then another with a more original name: Mature XXX. Viewer's Wives. Elite Nights. Essex Babes, L.A. Babes, (who look just the same), Blue Kiss, Bang Me---that sort of thing. Like a bushfire.

Which proved the demand was there. Is there. And TV responds to demand like a donkey responds to a stick but bearing in mind the vestiges of the Christian dispensation which have the power a six-foot hedge has to a donkey.

It is difficult to think of a more interesting subject than Media.
0 Replies
 
mushypancakes
 
  2  
Thu 3 Sep, 2009 08:27 am
@Muarck,
Those high waist ones always remind me of '80s videos and the whole bimbo-bigbleachedhair-look.

Cheekies and boyshorts are comfy.
spendius
 
  1  
Thu 3 Sep, 2009 02:16 pm
@mushypancakes,
All of them remind me that there is something we are not allowed to see and to draw attention to it at the same time. There seems little point to them otherwise.
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Wed 9 Sep, 2009 12:51 pm
@Muarck,
Low rise thong is for all those low cut pants (those that are cut lower in the waist so others don't see your underwear when you bend or your shirt goes up.

There is actually a reason besides the sexy side of things.
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Wed 9 Sep, 2009 12:52 pm
@contrex,
Not if you wipe as you should.

I wear thongs almost excusively - it minimizes panty lines.
spendius
 
  0  
Wed 9 Sep, 2009 05:19 pm
@Linkat,
Do you mind dear. I'm eating my supper. Have you no shame?
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/08/2021 at 07:22:24