1
   

IBM, from the Onion

 
 
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 06:56 am
I thought this was hilarious. Laughing

IBM EMANCIPATES 8,000 WAGE SLAVES

ARMONK, NY?-In a move hailed by corporation owners as a forward-thinking humanitarian gesture, IBM emancipated more than 8,000 wage slaves from its factories and offices Monday.

Above: Palmisano abolishes 600 jobs at the Essex Junction, VT, location.
"You are all free, free to go!" said IBM CEO Samuel J. Palmisano to the 600 men and women freed from the corporation's Essex Junction, VT, location. "No more must you live a bleak, hand-to-mouth existence, chained to your desks in a never-ending Monday-through-Friday, 9-to-5 cycle. Your future is wide-open. Now, go!"

The 600 newly freed workers cleared out their desks and were escorted from the building within an hour. In spite of Palmisano's jubilance, the emancipated wage slaves were strangely quiet as they filed into the parking lot, carrying their work possessions in cardboard boxes.

"I'll miss them," said Jim Tallman, manager of IBM's plant in Rochester, MN.

Tallman, who was ordered to set 150 of his factory's wage slaves free, added, "They were hard workers. Many of them were extremely intelligent. Some were like members of the family. But I know in my heart that having them here was a crime against human resources. The world is changing, especially the economy, and no decent businessman could look at the cost-benefit analysis and not see that turning them loose was the only thing to do."

Palmisano explained that, while IBM posted profits for its second quarter, its microelectronics sector lost money due to a sharp downturn in the industry. The corporation also freed wage slaves from plants in Endicott, NY; Austin, TX; and Raleigh, NC.

Public response to the emancipation has been largely positive, particularly among the company's shareholders. Value of IBM stock jumped 7.5 percent in the hours following the historic corporate-emancipation proclamation.

Business leaders have enthusiastically praised the wage-slave release.

"In these days of streamlined, modern business, wage slavery is an increasingly peculiar institution," CNN national business correspondent and arbitrage guru Mike Boettcher said. "We owe these poor, exploited people a chance to try to make it on their own merits. It's not right to work them to their deaths, or even to the usual retirement age of 67."

Palmisano said the move, although sudden, came at the right time.

"There is no reason for a modern-day John Henry to spend his life trying to out-spreadsheet an IBM business machine," Palmisano said. "Especially since our computers, properly programmed and equipped, can handle the accounting workload of hundreds of human beings."

Upon hearing the news, many of the liberated wage slaves expressed trepidation over their uncertain futures.

Above: The remaining IBM wage slaves toil in Endicott, NY.
"I don't know what I'm even supposed to do now," said Essex Junction's Anne Porter, 36. "I was born into a family of wage slaves. I've never known anything but wage slavery. I barely own anything more than the clothes on my back and the other, almost identical business-casual pantsuits hanging in the closet of my studio apartment."

"On the other hand, I'll never have to see that whip-cracking quality-assurance overseer again," Porter added.

President Bush hailed IBM's decision in an address to the White House press corps Monday.

"No one said freedom was easy," said Bush, who in recent months has praised wage-slave-emancipation programs initiated by Eastman Kodak, Sun Microsystems, AT&T, General Motors, Daimler-Chrysler, Ford, Boeing, General Mills, and Oracle. "But doing what's best for the corporation as a whole eventually benefits us all. This is what America is all about. I wish all the newly freed wage slaves the best of luck in their bright new futures."

Wall Street Journal analyst J. Craig Hoffman praised the emancipation.

"In a truly modern capitalist nation, letting people go is the only right thing to do," Hoffman said. "Certainly, IBM could have kept those poor wretches slaving away for the company, as some have been doing for the past 30 years. But, we must ask, at what cost?"

"Actually, $47,643 average annual overhead per worker, counting salary, benefits, and projected cost of pension or 401K co-payments, adjusted for inflation over the wage-slaves' useful lifespan, as it turns out," Hoffman added.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,302 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 08:49 am
I'm frigging confused slavery @ $47,643 per year seems decent for a "worker" slaving here in the USA.


So what IBM is saying is let's move the job to where we can get cheaper slaves?? So what they gunna call the new employee - endentured servants?
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 11:04 am
The article is a parody regarding massive layoffs at IBM husker.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 12:11 pm
In this day and age - it's almost to real!!
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2003 12:26 pm
That's the beauty of The Onion's humour, it's almost always right on target. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Oct, 2003 06:44 am
Love it, Cav.

We are right back where we were during the Gilded Age of the late 1800s. Mega-mergers are creating new monopolies. Loopholes in labor laws permit Fortune500 companies to lay off full-time workers in favor of part-timers who receive no benefits beyond an hourly wage and the labor unions are toothless tigers.

And, of course, euphemisms rule. The Onion is right on target. That is exactly how IBM would like to portray the massive downsizing if they thought they could get away with it.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Oct, 2003 07:12 am
Read this the other day (over crumb cake, mmm). Almost as funny was an interview in one of the local weeklies with Jon Stewart. "Is it strange doing stand-up?" "Well, I've been doing it for fifteen years, so no, it's not." "What do you think the importance of satire is to our culture?" "I don't think it's important at all. At least, it's not as useful as, say, filling potholes." "What is your role in the news media?" "The same as the role of the robots in Mystery Science Theater 3000. We sit back and shout derisive things at it."
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Oct, 2003 07:22 am
LOL!!!!!!!

And - looking through a glass onion is a damn fine thing to do - too.

I believe it IS real, Husker, BTW.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Oct, 2003 08:06 am
Truth is stranger than fiction.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Oct, 2003 08:59 am
pd -- love your transcript of that interview! I think interviewers on talk shows get special training in how to ask the most inane questions. Unfortunately, most interviewees don't realize they've been provided with a perfect 'straight man' and thus respond just as inanely. Stewart took full advantage of the opportunity offered, though.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Dispatches from the Startup Front - Discussion by jespah
Bullying Dominating Coworker - Question by blueskies
Co worker being caught looking at you - Question by lisa1471
Work Place Romance - Discussion by Dino12
Does your office do Christmas? - Discussion by tsarstepan
Question about this really rude girl at work? - Question by riverstyx0128
Does she like me? - Question by jct573
Does my coworker like me? - Question by riverstyx0128
Maintenance training - Question by apjones37643
Personal questions - Discussion by Angel23
Making friends/networking at work - Question by egrizzly
 
  1. Forums
  2. » IBM, from the Onion
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/03/2026 at 11:14:51