@fresco,
Thank you.
I get about as much as I think I can without the background in science that you have. It makes sense.
Is that your specific interpretation of Einstein, or did Einstein say something similar himself? Is there anything written on Einstein's metaphysics?
You 'tie in' a lot of scientific knowledge to back up your stance. It's relation to the non-dualist worldview you maintain, as you say in other posts, may be coincidental, but on the other hand many not. You've given me a lot to chase up on 'mystical' philosophy, (thank you) is there a paper written upon the way in which this science and the 'mystical' metaphysical perspective integrate?
Quote:". There are only shared expectancies in particular contexts (reference to Kuhn's "paradigms"). There will always be sub-levels of analysis which deconstruct axioms.
I am inclined to believe so, but can we express it in this way? 'Always' makes it an axiom in itself.
Do you mean it in the sense that 'it's turtles all the way down'?