Reply
Fri 3 Oct, 2003 11:34 pm
Kofi Annan has just confirmed that the UN cocktail circuit cannot function in Iraq.
UN rebuffs US over Iraq plans
Mr Powell says he would welcome suggestions from critics
United Nations officials have underlined their intention to play no role in Iraq's political future unless the US revises its plans for the country.
In a briefing to journalists, an unnamed senior UN official said Washington would have to undertake a radical revision of a draft resolution on Iraq submitted to the Security Council.
The remarks echo unusual criticism expressed by the UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan.
France, Russia and Germany have also expressed their concern, with Paris calling for a stronger role for the UN in Iraq.
Mr Annan made it clear at a private lunch with the 15 Security Council ambassadors that the UN was not prepared to risk its staff for the limited political role proposed by the US, a senior UN official said on Friday.
The BBC's UN correspondent Greg Barrow says it is rare for the UN to voice such candid opposition to plans put forward by one of its member states, not least the most powerful.
US DRAFT'S KEY POINTS
Bigger UN role
Progressive handover of power to Iraqis
New constitution and elections
Multi-national force under unified command
Effective Iraqi police and security forces
Full range of loans for reconstruction
Full text: US draft resolution
Tough talks ahead on Iraq
But he says such is the level of concern about the situation in Iraq that Mr Annan and his officials appear to have decided that the time has come to speak plainly.
Mr Annan believes the UN proposals would expose UN staff to added risk after two bombings at the UN's headquarters in Baghdad which killed 23 people, the unnamed UN official said.
Different timetables
Responding to the criticism, US Secretary of State Colin Powell telephoned Mr Annan to assure him the US wanted a stronger role for the UN in Iraq, a US official said.
Mr Powell told reporters in Washington: "We are anxious to receive specific suggestions to improve the proposed resolution."
But analysts said the US was looking increasingly isolated, with Mr Annan's comments exacerbating the doubts which many Security Council members already had.
The draft resolution - due to be discussed by council members next week - calls for the political transition to be as quick as possible and urges member states to contribute to a multinational force.
BBC diplomatic correspondent Barnaby Mason says the US draft does not say how the UN's role would be stronger, while other clauses imply that the US-led coalition will continue to have the predominant voice.
A major sticking point is the chronology of a return to democracy.
The US wants a new Iraqi constitution first and then elections. The UN says in its experience more can be achieved by establishing a transitional government, restoring democracy and then elections.
France said the draft failed to incorporate changes to an earlier version that both France and Germany had asked for.
"Our first impression is that our concerns are not reflected in the revised US draft resolution except in a very limited way," said foreign ministry spokesman Herve Ladsous.
Russian President Vladimir Putin was also critical, saying said Moscow was "not satisfied" with the latest draft resolution.
The US has said it wants to get a resolution passed before an international conference to raise money to help rebuild Iraq later this month.
The Security Council is due to meet again on Monday.
France has said that despite its misgivings, it will not veto a resolution when it is put to a vote.
Can you tell me what the source is for this article please? Unless I missed it, I can't find a link or credit.
Webb
Quote:
Bush is considering inviting Israel to become part of the peacekeeping force?
Not in a million years.
As for the UN the paper tiger strikes again.
Butrflynet:
I couldn't find the exact source but I took it from this site: That particular article is several days old and has been archived already.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/
This is an excellent site for commentary on a daily basis. The articles tend to run on the conservative side but there is some balance.