Einstein's General Relativity

Yes, I'm a little behind the times. It turns out that classical physics is now called the theory of relativity. A “theory” that has no practical significance has suddenly become classical physics. World has gone mad.

What curved space, what flattened twins, what contraction along the x axis...???

The theory of relativity was a total success because it predicted its own failure.

This theory was always a none starter because a fairytale science claimed that a single Big Bang happened by magic from nothing.

I prefer a sound science myself that can explain the primary energy source for big bangs.

That source is the electromagnetic fields which saturate the cosmos which causes spin of all objects in the cosmos thus producing their N and S Poles, all of which vibratory interact and balance out due to the formula +/-=+/-

This vibratory interaction produces the binary code that nature and the brain processes.

Who needs Einstein’s theories?

You don’t have a sound scientific theory until you can explain the primary energy source for a big bang which is why the theory of relativity failed.

Things only happen by magic from nothing in fairytales.

What is more realistic to believe? Magic caused a single big bang from nothing or a scientific explanation that the electromagnetic fields that saturate the cosmos causes the spin of all objects at the macro and micro levels which results in the secondary energies of attractive and repulsive interactive forces which causes ALL big bangs AND big crunches.

Equal but Opposite electromagnetic energy is balanced out and conserved in the cosmos by the push/pull formula +/-=+/-

You don’t need Einsteins theories.

Einsteins theories are incorrect because galaxies are appearing and disappearing all the time in varying timescales in the cosmos.So why do scientists continue to insist on adopting his theories.?

Presently,science doesn’t have a primary energy source for its single big bang but has to rely on magic so we know that Einsteins theories are incorrect as explained above.Neither does it have a primary energy source for its single big crunch either but is having to rely on a mathematical invention that objects in the cosmos roll around bent space/time.This will be proved to be utter nonsense as well.

Where does consciousness appear in Einstein’s equations? How do his theories explain consciousness? They don’t/can’t because they are nothing more than mathematical garbage as Nickola Tesla stated as well.

Only the magnetism theory can explain consciousness.

You require push/pull forces to explain the operation of the cosmos because you need to be able to explain how binary code is produced from vibration which nature adopts for communication purposes.

Mass bends space time….lol……what a load of nonsense.What force is it that determines the DIRECTION in which space time is bent by that mass?

A magical force again?