Heh, Max, more bloviating with (completely uninformed) resort to fallacious ad populum, ad verecundiam, and ad hominem "arguments," eh? It's old, sorry.
1. For about the 1,000th time, math has absolutely NOTHING to do with the issues I raise.
2. I have never disputed Feynman. On the contrary I have cited his resolution of the "twin paradox" as saying the exact thing I (and millions of others) am saying.
3. You couldn't begin to "point out" my" mistakes," because you don't even know what the topic is. Furthermore, you have repeatedly demonstrated your lack of understanding of the theory of SR, as opposed to LR.
4. Yes, education is important. So why don't you educate yourself on a topic before pretending to have an answer, eh?