Jane Goodall hasn't claimed my statement was incorrect without backing it up with reasonable arguments. You, on the other hand, have. I chose to see your choice not to answer as an admission that you have nothing of relevance to offer.
What makes you say that?
I bet you think you are very clever.
But I can only judge by what I see, and what I see is what you show me, and what you show me is the most imbecile and adolescent behaviour I have ever come across in this forum.
Is your pride sore because you couldn't keep up? Calling someone a liar is a kind of serious. And if you fail to back up that claim, you are usually the one who gets stuck with the label.
Is your new work about why you think I am a liar?