@littlek,
littlek wrote:Marty - that's what I thought! If he forgoes stents now, will open heart surgery be more likely later?
Today, on
All Things Considered,
they discussed a new study you may find interesting. Published in the latest issue of the
New England Journal of Medicine (February 19), it tries to pin down the merits of stents compared to bypass surgery.
According to NPR's summary, their basic findings are these: 1) There is no one-size-fits-all answer. Stents are better for some patients, bypass surgery for others. 2) Generally speaking, stents and bypass surgery are about equally effective in preventing future heart problems. But stents are much less invasive, and patients recover much more quickly from the operation. I interpret this as saying that stents are the better approach more often than not -- same benefit, less trouble with the operation. But NPR isn't saying this in so many words.
The New England Journal of Medicine has a web page linking to the study itself, and to a panel discussion among experts on what the study means.
You can find their page here.