0
   

Steele's Campaign Spending

 
 
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2009 10:04 am
The Washington Post
Steele's Campaign Spending Questioned

updated 4:34 a.m. CT, Sat., Feb. 7, 2009
WASHINGTON - Michael S. Steele, the newly elected chairman of the Republican National Committee, arranged for his 2006 Senate campaign to pay a defunct company run by his sister for services that were never performed, his finance chairman from that campaign has told federal prosecutors.

Federal agents in recent days contacted Steele's sister, a spokesman for Steele said yesterday.

The claim about the payment, one of several allegations by Alan B. Fabian, is outlined in a confidential court document. Fabian offered the information last March as he was seeking leniency for himself during plea negotiations on unrelated fraud charges. It is unclear how extensively his claims have been pursued. Prosecutors gave him no credit for cooperation when he was sentenced in October
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 561 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2009 10:37 pm
@edgarblythe,
Steele's campaign spending has been questioned - by a convicted fraud who got no credit for cooperation from the police.

OK - so what?

Since you are not A2K's news ticker tape, I have to assume that there was a reason, other than civic duty, for you to share this story with us.

Is there a conclusion to be drawn from this article?

0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2009 10:41 pm
You aren't smart enough to figure it out?
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Feb, 2009 11:40 pm
@edgarblythe,
Obviously not.

Please enlighten me.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2009 06:54 pm
If they didn't have anything to go on, they wouldn't be running an investigation. Now we just have to watch and see how serious it all is.
JamesMorrison
 
  2  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2009 07:48 pm
@edgarblythe,
Actually, George Stephanopoulos questioned Steele about this on ABC's "This Week" this morning. Steele not only expained but intimated that he had already turned over all receipts showing all that had happened and when to the Post, they still went with the story even though the FBI has not even contacted Steele let alone notified him of an impending investigation into his actions in this context.

Do not be surprised when the Post drops the story. Do be suprised if they apologize for printing a story about a convicted felon trying to decrease jail time by attempting to put Michael Steel in authorities' cross hairs (i.e. this is not a Daschle like "Gotcha" moment for the Post)

JM
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Feb, 2009 08:53 pm
@JamesMorrison,
I would prefer that the story be false, because there are enough crooks out there already. Still, I think it bears watching for a while.
0 Replies
 
A Lone Voice
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Feb, 2009 10:41 pm
I find it interesting that only a couple days after Eric Holder is sworn in as AG, a court sealed file finds it way 'inadvertently' to the Washington Post...

Interesting that our 'news ticker' didn't include that part of the story.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Steele's Campaign Spending
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 04:51:34