18
   

Despite a bipartisan effort...

 
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 07:34 am
@genoves,
genoves wrote:

Nimh. The man from Holland and is now strictly from Hungar-y and is reflexively Anti-American, gives us a Gallup Poll.

I've read hundreds of Nimh's posts and never once would I describe them as "reflexively Anti-American." If his some of his posts are critical of the US, they are at least well considered.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 07:56 am
@genoves,
going from 65% to 60% approval is hardly dropping rapidly. It is almost the margin of error and is considered a slight change if even a change.
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 10:30 am
A better bill from Walt Minnick an Idaho Democrat, no less, and at only a fifth of the cost

Quote:
Minnick is a member of the Blue Dog caucus of occasionally conservative Democcrats. His START plan is a $170 billion “bare bones” pure stimulus approach that would put $100 billion immediately into the pockets of low- and middle-income Americans, then use the other $70 billion for basic infrastructure projects that create jobs. START requires that all funds not spent by 2010 be returned to the Treasury. START also stops stimulus spending when the nation’s Gross Domestic Product increases in two of three previous quarters, and all START payments are required to be posted on a public website."


I especially like the idea of including a metric when to stop spending if things improve more quickly than anticipated and having a drop dead date to return unspent dollars to the Treasury. Add a one-time check clause i.e, the expenditures are prohibited from being included in future budgets....and you might have something there I could support.

Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 10:31 am
@slkshock7,
slkshock7 wrote:

A better bill from Walt Minnick an Idaho Democrat, no less, and at only a fifth of the cost

Quote:
Minnick is a member of the Blue Dog caucus of occasionally conservative Democcrats. His START plan is a $170 billion “bare bones” pure stimulus approach that would put $100 billion immediately into the pockets of low- and middle-income Americans, then use the other $70 billion for basic infrastructure projects that create jobs. START requires that all funds not spent by 2010 be returned to the Treasury. START also stops stimulus spending when the nation’s Gross Domestic Product increases in two of three previous quarters, and all START payments are required to be posted on a public website."


I especially like the idea of including a metric when to stop spending if things improve more quickly than anticipated and having a drop dead date to return unspent dollars to the Treasury. Add a one-time check clause i.e, the expenditures are prohibited from being included in future budgets....and you might have something there I could support.


Not enough money to make a dent in the problem, no relief for the states. He leaves out some critical components of a stimulus bill.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 10:37 am
Just giving people tax cuts and cash is not the answer. People use the money for paying off bills, buying stock, etc., not buying things that will stimulate the economy significantly. Moreover, tax cuts tend to become permanent and end up being much more expensive than other approaches. A much better use of govt. funds would be to create jobs.
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 10:38 am
@Advocate,
If giving tax cuts and cash is not the answer (which I agree with you on) then why are we doing it to the tune of 400 billion in Obama's plan
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 11:09 am
Cyclo wrote:
Not enough money to make a dent in the problem, no relief for the states. He leaves out some critical components of a stimulus bill.


Only if you believe that the Obama-Pelosi-Reid bill is the model for stimulus bills...but the truth of the matter is that trying to jump start a $14 trillion economy has has never been done before and therefore one man's guess is as good as another's. In fact, it's pure speculation that this bill (or the Obama bill) will make one iota of difference. For every economist that says you must spend like there's no tomorrow, you find another economist that says this will do no good or even harm the economy. Below is a quote from Cato Institute wherein some 200 economists (3 Nobel Laureates) say increased spending is NOT the way to go....Cato source

Cato Institute wrote:
Notwithstanding reports that all economists are now Keynesians and that we all support a big increase in the burden of government, we do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance. More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan's "lost decade" in the 1990s. As such, it is a triumph of hope over experience to believe that more government spending will help the U.S. today. To improve the economy, policy makers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, saving, investment and production. Lower tax rates and a reduction in the burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 12:19 pm
@slkshock7,
OMG, Cato recommending tax cuts and less regulation as a solution to a problem?

Shocking!

In less ridiculous news,

Stimulus bill passes senate 61-37. Headed off to conference now, where hopefully they will put back in some of the money that the idiot Republicans insisted be cut out.

Cycloptichorn
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 12:21 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
I'm looking forward to cashing SS checks in Yen.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 12:22 pm
@maporsche,
maporsche wrote:

I'm looking forward to cashing SS checks in Yen.


Moving to Japan?

Cycloptichorn
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 12:27 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Dammit, I meant the Yuan.

And no, not moving, but China is buying America, and we're gladly letting them do it.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 12:38 pm
@maporsche,
The same argument was made with regard to Japan and California back in the 80s and 90s.

C'mon... shock us with an original thought.
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2009 03:42 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cyclo wrote:
OMG, Cato recommending tax cuts and less regulation as a solution to a problem?


It wasn't just the CATO but 200 economists of some renown who put their name on the statement....
genoves
 
  0  
Reply Wed 11 Feb, 2009 02:46 am
@slkshock7,
Ofcourse, slkshock7--200 Economists of renown--Thanks for the link.

With all due respect
Mr.President,that is not true.
There is no disagreement that we
need action byour government,
a recovery plan that will help to
jumpstart the economy.
Notwithstanding reports that all economists are now Keynesians and that we all support a big increase in the burden of
government, we the undersigned do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance.
More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in
the 1930s. More government spending did not solve Japan’s “lost decade” in the 1990s. As such, it is a triumph of hope over
experience to believe that more government spending will help the U.S. today. To improve the economy, policymakers should
focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, saving, investment and production. Lower tax rates and a reduction in the
burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth.
TO PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OBAMA, JANUARY 9 , 2009
PA I D F O R B Y T H E CAT O I N S T I T U T E , WWW. CAT O . O R G
BURTON ABRAMS, Univ. of Delaware
DOUGLAS ADIE, Ohio University
LEE ADKINS, Oklahoma State University
WILLIAM ALBRECHT, Univ. of Iowa
RYAN AMACHER, Univ. of Texas at Arlington
J.J.ARIAS, Georgia College & State University
HOWARD BAETJER, JR., Towson University
CHARLES BAIRD, California State University, East Bay
STACIE BECK, Univ. of Delaware
DON BELLANTE, Univ. of South Florida
JAMES BENNETT, George Mason University
BRUCE BENSON, Florida State University
SANJAI BHAGAT, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder
MARK BILS, Univ. of Rochester
ALBERTO BISIN, New York University
WALTER BLOCK, Loyola University New Orleans
CECIL BOHANON, Ball State University
MICHELE BOLDRIN,Washington University in St. Louis
DONALD BOOTH, Chapman University
MICHAEL BORDO, Rutgers University
SAMUEL BOSTAPH, Univ. of Dallas
DONALD BOUDREAUX, George Mason University
SCOTT BRADFORD, Brigham Young University
GENEVIEVE BRIAND, Eastern Washington University
IVAN BRICK, Rutgers University
GEORGE BROWER, Moravian College
PHILLIP BRYSON, Brigham Young University
JAMES BUCHANAN, Nobel laureate
RICHARD BURDEKIN, Claremont McKenna College
RICHARD BURKHAUSER, Cornell University
EDWIN T. BURTON, Univ. of Virginia
JIM BUTKIEWICZ, Univ. of Delaware
HENRY BUTLER, Northwestern University
WILLIAM BUTOS, Trinity College
PETER CALCAGNO, College of Charleston
BRYAN CAPLAN, George Mason University
ART CARDEN, Rhodes College
JAMES CARDON, Brigham Young University
DUSTIN CHAMBERS, Salisbury University
EMILY CHAMLEE-WRIGHT, Beloit College
V.V. CHARI, Univ. of Minnesota
BARRY CHISWICK, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago
LAWRENCE CIMA, John Carroll University
J.R. CLARK, Univ. of Tennessee at Chattanooga
GIAN LUCA CLEMENTI, New York University
R.MORRIS COATS, Nicholls State University
JOHN COCHRAN, Metropolitan State College at Denver
JOHN COCHRANE, Univ. of Chicago
JOHN COGAN, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
LLOYD COHEN, George Mason University
JOHN COLEMAN, Duke University
BOYD COLLIER, Tarleton State University
ROBERT COLLINGE, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio
PETER COLWELL, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
MICHAEL CONNOLLY, Univ. of Miami
LEE COPPOCK, Univ. of Virginia
MARIO CRUCINI, Vanderbilt University
CHRISTOPHER CULP, Univ. of Chicago
KIRBY CUNDIFF, Northeastern State University
ANTONY DAVIES, Duquesne University
JOHN DAWSON, Appalachian State University
A. EDWARD DAY, Univ. of Texas at Dallas
CLARENCE DEITSCH, Ball State University
ALLAN DESERPA, Arizona State University
WILLIAM DEWALD, Ohio State University
ARTHUR DIAMOND, JR., Univ. of Nebraska at Omaha
JOHN DOBRA, Univ. of Nevada, Reno
JAMES DORN, Towson University
CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS, Univ. of Michigan, Flint
FLOYD DUNCAN, Virginia Military Institute
FRANCIS EGAN, Trinity College
JOHN EGGER, Towson University
KENNETH ELZINGA, Univ. of Virginia
PAUL EVANS, Ohio State University
FRANK FALERO, California State University, Bakersfield
EUGENE FAMA, Univ. of Chicago
W. KEN FARR, Georgia College & State University
DANIEL FEENBERG, National Bureau
of Economic Research
HARTMUT FISCHER, Univ. of San Francisco
ERIC FISHER, California State Polytechnic University
FRED FOLDVARY, Santa Clara University
MURRAY FRANK, Univ. of Minnesota
PETER FRANK,Wingate University
TIMOTHY FUERST, Bowling Green State University
B. DELWORTH GARDNER, Brigham Young University
JOHN GAREN, Univ. of Kentucky
RICK GEDDES, Cornell University
AARON GELLMAN, Northwestern University
WILLIAM GERDES, Clarke College
JOSEPH GIACALONE, St. John’s University
MICHAEL GIBBS, Univ. of Chicago
OTIS GILLEY, Louisiana Tech University
STEPHAN GOHMANN, Univ. of Louisville
RODOLFO GONZALEZ, San Jose State University
RICHARD GORDON, Penn State University
PETER GORDON, Univ. of Southern California
ERNIE GOSS, Creighton University
PAUL GREGORY, Univ. of Houston
EARL GRINOLS, Baylor University
DANIEL GROPPER, Auburn University
R.W. HAFER, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
ARTHUR HALL, Univ. of Kansas
STEVE HANKE, Johns Hopkins University
STEPHEN HAPPEL, Arizona State University
RICHARD HART, Miami University
THOMAS HAZLETT, George Mason University
FRANK HEFNER, College of Charleston
SCOTT HEIN, Texas Tech University
RONALD HEINER, George Mason University
DAVID HENDERSON, Hoover Institution,
Stanford University
ROBERT HERREN, North Dakota State University
GAILEN HITE, Columbia University
STEVEN HORWITZ, St. Lawrence University
DANIEL HOUSER, George Mason University
JOHN HOWE, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia
JEFFREY HUMMEL, San Jose State University
BRUCE HUTCHINSON, Univ. of Tennessee at Chattanooga
BRIAN JACOBSEN,Wisconsin Lutheran College
SHERRY JARRELL,Wake Forest University
JASON JOHNSTON, Univ. of Pennsylvania
BOYAN JOVANOVIC, New York University
JONATHAN KARPOFF, Univ. of Washington
BARRY KEATING, Univ. of Notre Dame
NAVEEN KHANNA, Michigan State University
NICHOLAS KIEFER, Cornell University
DANIEL KLEIN, George Mason University
PAUL KOCH, Univ. of Kansas
NARAYANA KOCHERLAKOTA, Univ. of Minnesota
MAREK KOLAR, Delta College
ROGER KOPPL, Fairleigh Dickinson University
KISHORE KULKARNI, Metropolitan
State College of Denver
DEEPAK LAL, UCLA
GEORGE LANGELETT, South Dakota State University
JAMES LARRIVIERE, Spring Hill College
ROBERT LAWSON, Auburn University
JOHN LEVENDIS, Loyola University New Orleans
DAVID LEVINE,Washington University in St. Louis
PETER LEWIN, Univ. of Texas at Dallas
W. CRIS LEWIS, Utah State University
DEAN LILLARD, Cornell University
ZHENG LIU, Emory University
ALAN LOCKARD, Binghampton University
EDWARD LOPEZ, San Jose State University
JOHN R. LOTT, Jr., Univ. of Maryland
JOHN LUNN, Hope College
GLENN MACDONALD,Washington
University in St. Louis
HENRY MANNE, George Mason University
MICHAEL MARLOW, California
Polytechnic State University
DERYL MARTIN, Tennessee Tech University
DALE MATCHECK, Northwood University
JOHN MATSUSAKA, Univ. of Southern California
THOMAS MAYOR, Univ. of Houston
DEIRDRE MCCLOSKEY, University of Illinois at Chicago
JOHN MCDERMOTT, Univ. of South Carolina
JOSEPH MCGARRITY, Univ. of Central Arkansas
ROGER MEINERS, Univ. of Texas at Arlington
ALLAN MELTZER, Carnegie Mellon University
JOHN MERRIFIELD, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio
JAMES MILLER III, George Mason University
JEFFREY MIRON, Harvard University
THOMAS MOELLER, Texas Christian University
JOHN MOORHOUSE,Wake Forest University
ANDREA MORO, Vanderbilt University
ANDREW MORRISS, Univ. of Illinois
at Urbana-Champaign
MICHAEL MUNGER, Duke University
KEVIN MURPHY, Univ. of Southern California
DAVID MUSTARD, Univ. of Georgia
RICHARD MUTH, Emory University
CHARLES NELSON, Univ. of Washington
WILLIAM NISKANEN, Cato Institute
SETH NORTON, Wheaton College
LEE OHANIAN, UCLA
LYDIA ORTEGA, San Jose State University
EVAN OSBORNE, Wright State University
RANDALL PARKER, East Carolina University
ALLEN PARKMAN, Univ. of New Mexico
DONALD PARSONS, George Washington University
SAM PELTZMAN, Univ. of Chicago
TIMOTHY PERRI, Appalachian State University
MARK PERRY, Univ. of Michigan, Flint
CHRISTOPHER PHELAN, Univ. of Minnesota
GORDON PHILLIPS, Univ. of Maryland
MICHAEL PIPPENGER, Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks
TOMASZ PISKORSKI, Columbia University
BRENNAN PLATT, Brigham Young University
JOSEPH POMYKALA, Towson University
WILLIAM POOLE, Univ. of Delaware
BARRY POULSON, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder
BENJAMIN POWELL, Suffolk University
EDWARD PRESCOTT, Nobel laureate
GARY QUINLIVAN, Saint Vincent College
REZA RAMAZANI, Saint Michael’s College
ADRIANO RAMPINI, Duke University
ERIC RASMUSEN, Indiana University
MARIO RIZZO, New York University
NANCY ROBERTS, Arizona State University
RICHARD ROLL, UCLA
ROBERT ROSSANA,Wayne State University
JAMES ROUMASSET, Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa
JOHN ROWE, Univ. of South Florida
CHARLES ROWLEY, George Mason University
JUAN RUBIO-RAMIREZ, Duke University
ROY RUFFIN, Univ. of Houston
KEVIN SALYER, Univ. of California, Davis
THOMAS SAVING, Texas A&M University
PAVEL SAVOR, Univ. of Pennsylvania
RONALD SCHMIDT, Univ. of Rochester
CARLOS SEIGLIE, Rutgers University
ALAN SHAPIRO, Univ. of Southern California
WILLIAM SHUGHART II, Univ. of Mississippi
CHARLES SKIPTON, Univ. of Tampa
JAMES SMITH,Western Carolina University
VERNON SMITH, Nobel laureate
LAWRENCE SOUTHWICK, JR., Univ. at Buffalo
DEAN STANSEL, Florida Gulf Coast University
HOUSTON STOKES, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago
BRIAN STROW,Western Kentucky University
SHIRLEY SVORNY, California State
University, Northridge
JOHN TATOM, Indiana State University
WADE THOMAS, State University
of New York at Oneonta
HENRY THOMPSON, Auburn University
ALEX TOKAREV, The King’s College
EDWARD TOWER, Duke University
LEO TROY, Rutgers University
WILLIAM TRUMBULL,West Virginia University
DAVID TUERCK, Suffolk University
CHARLOTTE TWIGHT, Boise State University
KAMAL UPADHYAYA, Univ. of New Haven
CHARLES UPTON, Kent State University
T. NORMANVAN COTT, Ball State University
RICHARDVEDDER, Ohio University
RICHARDWAGNER, George Mason University
DOUGLAS M.WALKER, College of Charleston
DOUGLAS O.WALKER, Regent University
MARCWEIDENMIER, Claremont McKenna College
CHRISTOPHERWESTLEY, Jacksonville
State University
ROBERTWHAPLES,Wake Forest University
LAWRENCEWHITE, Univ. of Missouri at St. Louis
WALTERWILLIAMS, George Mason University
DOUGWILLS, Univ. of Washington Tacoma
DENNISWILSON,Western Kentucky University
GARYWOLFRAM, Hillsdale College
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  0  
Reply Wed 11 Feb, 2009 02:51 am
@slkshock7,
You must remember, slkshock7, that Cyclo is from Berkeley--the last bastion of Communism in the United States. He bashes the Cato Institute, which most scholars identify as Libertarian, because his politics are on the EXTREME LEFT.

His usual reponse is not to rebut with evidence. If you find his posts, you will see that he solves his problems with ideas or people who give evidence opposed to his left wing stances with such rational responses as "assholes"
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Feb, 2009 07:25 am
Quote:
Lower tax rates and a reduction in the burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth


As though this hasn't been tried first under Reagan then retried under Bush with disastrous results we are now paying for big time.

Quote:
"If you keep hitting your head against a wall and it starts to hurt, at some point don't you stop hitting it against the wall?"
Obama
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Feb, 2009 08:37 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Earlier Cyclo and Maporsche had a bit of back & forth about a graph that was created by the Speaker's office, which compared the loss of jobs in this crisis with those in previous crises in absolute numbers of jobs lost. Maporsche complained, reasonably enough, that the size of the labour market is now very different, so you can't compare absolute numbers without losing a sense of the proportions involved.

Kevin Drum's passes on a graph now comparing the job losses in six consecutive recessions in percentual terms, so that should be better. It still looks very bad, though:

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/Blog_Past_Six_Recessions.gif

Drum:

Quote:
Unlike a similar chart that's been making the rounds, which showed only the 1991 and 2001 recessions, this one shows employment decline in percentage terms, not as raw job losses. This is a better way of doing it since the population of the U.S. has grown substantially since 1974.

But it still looks plenty bad. Right now we can say that this is the worst recession since 1981, but by summer it's almost certain that we'll be saying it's the worst recession since World War II.
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Feb, 2009 08:49 am
@roger,
roger wrote:

I suppose it's a fundamental difference in beliefs, engineer. If your beliefs lean towards pure Keynesian economics, you may be right. Mine do not.

Hmm, I think it's more of a question of pragmatism than ideology. Or at least, it should be. Some economic situations ask for balanced budgets and fiscal prudency; some economic situations require Keynesian government investments.

The thing is that such a pragmatic approach should work exactly the other way round from what you suggest. The kind of economy where you have the federal government operating in the black probably wouldn't require Keynesian solutions in the first place.

It's times of impending crisis like these, where you're facing a looming downward spiral of economic freeze, with credit freezing up causing economic activity to spiral down causing job losses and income losses that makes more loans go bad that creates even more of a credit crunch etc -- it's at a moment like that, the way I understand it, that you need a Keynesian intervention to break the spiral and jumpstart the economy again. Even though it's exactly times like those that the government would tend to already be in the red anyway.

Then when the economy is going well, the government can gradually close the spigots again and bring government finances back into the black. It's not like it hasn't been done before - that's exactly what happened in the Clinton years.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Feb, 2009 11:06 am
@nimh,
Thanks Nimh.

Have you by chance seen any graph/chart that also includes the previous 6-12 months before the peak month?
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Feb, 2009 08:52 pm
@nimh,
nimh notes that this is the worst recession since 1981, but by summer it's almost certain that we'll be saying that it's the worst recession since world war II.

I don't agree at all. Nimh is discounting the incredible charisma of our new leader. The American people elected Obama by a wide margin. If he It seems kind of nuts that in my circa 1920 neighborhood that a teacher wouldn't say "Have you had his lead levels tested?" before they start yammering about ADD. I intend to have Mo's tested straight away. r
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 04:12:37