5
   

What is Obamas policy

 
 
genoves
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 1 Feb, 2009 02:21 am
@Joe Nation,
Why are we wasting American lives and American resources which we need so badly in a unnecessary war in Afghanistan? It's time to take our troops out of Afghanistan. Doesn't President Obama know that the Soviets were badly beaten after years of useless struggle against the Afghanistan nation.

It's time for President Obama to show that his passion for peace is real. We cannot keep our troops in Afghanistan in a useless war!!!
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 1 Feb, 2009 02:27 am
@Joe Nation,


After we pull out of Afghanistan, we must then, according to Joe Nation, Help President Obama "save the homes of the millions of middle-class workers".

Like most left wingers, Joe Nation apparently loves to throw around unsupported and undocumented generalzations?

MILLIONS of middle-class workers? Exactly how many?

Were they ALL middle class? None of them were upper lower class? It certainly seems so since some of the moronic bought homes with no money down. I think anyone who did that deserves to have the roof fall in on them!!
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 1 Feb, 2009 02:33 am
When will President Obama take our troops out of Afghanistan? Every American life is precious. At least 5 74 American troops have been killed and 1,722 seriously wounded in Afghanistan. What are we doing there? President Obama has not explained our presence there.

Bring our troops back home!!!!!
candide
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Feb, 2009 05:42 pm
I wonder what Obama will do with our Social Security? Its a big pot. There working on ways of getting it right now.

Remember when Bush was going to make it so people could invest Their Social Security? And then the market crashed.

Round two of your Social Security should be just around the corner.
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 24 Feb, 2009 08:06 pm
@genoves,
The left wing( see the Huffington Post) is already complaining about Obama's tactics in Afghanistan. The Human Rights Groups are saying that the prisons holding the Afhgan Taliban in Afghanistan are much worse than Gitmo.

Is this Obama's policy? I thought he was a human rights person>
candide
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Mar, 2009 09:14 am
@genoves,
I think the oligarchy knew it was time for a "change" for the people to pacify any real awakening. "Hope and change" is their rhetoric coming with a black face.

Policy and agenda stay on point. There is only one party. This one party needs two parties to operate under the guise of a democracy but all the money comes from the same source.
0 Replies
 
candide
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Mar, 2009 09:23 am
What is Obamas policy
1. 30,000 troops to Afganastan
2. 16 more months in Iraq
3. missle systems into eastern Europe around Russia
candide
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Mar, 2009 10:41 am
http://www.alternet.org/workplace/132862/the_voters%27_uprising%3A_president_obama_what_are_you_thinking/?page=1

The Voters' Uprising: President Obama What Are You Thinking?


As each day's events unfold, increasing numbers of people are getting angrier and angrier, demanding a government that represents their interests. Why? As Bill Greider so eloquently describes, the reasons are pretty clear and straightforward:

"During the past nine months, gigantic financial bailouts amid collapsing economic life made visible the crippling divide between governing elites and citizens at large. People everywhere learned a blunt lesson about power, who has it and who doesn't. They watched Washington rush to rescue the very financial interests that caused the catastrophe. They learned that government has plenty of money to spend when the right people want it. 'Where's my bailout,' became the rueful punch line at lunch counters and construction sites nationwide. Then to deepen the insult, people watched as establishment forces relaunched their campaign for "entitlement reform" -- a euphemism for whacking Social Security benefits, Medicare and Medicaid."

The much younger and more surly Matt Taibbi, who uses language more salty and immediate than Greider, but who is no less a brilliant observer of history and popular anger, also thinks that a coup is under way -- that Wall Street Insiders are using the bailout to stage a revolution. That the global economic crisis isn't about money -- it's about power.

Writes Taibbi in Rolling Stone:

“It's over -- we're officially, royally fucked. No empire can survive being rendered a permanent laughingstock, which is what happened as of a few weeks ago, when the buffoons who have been running things in this country finally went one step too far. It happened when Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was forced to admit that he was once again going to have to stuff billions of taxpayer dollars into a dying insurance giant called AIG, itself a profound symbol of our national decline -- a corporation that got rich insuring the concrete and steel of American industry in the country's heyday, only to destroy itself chasing phantom fortunes at the Wall Street card tables, like a dissolute nobleman gambling away the family estate in the waning days of the British empire."
Just about everything is riding on how we navigate this unprecedented, and frightening, moment in history. And and our new president appears to be on the verge of squandering the enormous goodwill that swept him into office. He has a decision to make, and thus far he seems to be siding with the banks and not with his voters. If that is what he continues to do, it could be a very quick demise to a very promising career, as his unpopularity will quickly build.

Frank Rich, in another compelling essay from Sunday calls it, Obama's "Katrina moment":

"A charming visit with Jay Leno won't fix it. A 90 percent tax on bankers' bonuses won't fix it. Firing Timothy Geithner won't fix it. Unless and until Barack Obama addresses the full depth of Americans' anger with his full arsenal of policy smarts and political gifts, his presidency and, worse, our economy will be paralyzed. It would be foolish to dismiss as hyperbole the stark warning delivered by Paulette Altmaier of Cupertino, Calif., in a letter to the editor published by the [New York] Times last week: 'President Obama may not realize it yet, but his Katrina moment has arrived.' "

Rich writes: "Six weeks ago, I wrote ... that the country's surge of populist rage could devour the president's best-laid plans, including the essential Act II of the bank rescue, if he didn't get in front of it ..."


But according to Rich, the Obama administration is stumbling: "Otherwise it never would have used Lawrence Summers, the chief economic adviser, as a messenger just as the AIG rage was reaching a full boil last weekend. Summers is so tone-deaf that he makes Geithner seem like Bobby Kennedy. Bob Schieffer of CBS asked Summers the simple question that has haunted the American public since the bailouts began last fall: "Do you know, Dr. Summers, what the banks have done with all of this money that has been funneled to them through these bailouts?" What followed was a monologue of evasion that, translated into English, amounted to: Not really, but you little folk needn't worry about it. "

There is much outrage across the land and increasing agitation. Many want to know what they can do to channel their frustration and anger in useful and productive ways. Over the next days and weeks AlterNet will be capturing the best of the ideas and organizing, the best writing, opinions via interviews, and novel and compelling experiments designed to face a future that none of us expected, and frankly are not quite prepared for. One interesting idea -- Common Security Clubs -- part study circle, part mutual-aid association and part social-action group, are popping up in communities where people are looking for ways to support each other and take action.

Chuck Collins writes:

"The common security club model was born out of work done in the last few years by people struggling with overwhelming indebtedness. Participants spend some time discussing the root causes of the economic crisis, drawing on readings and materials provided by the network. But they mostly focus on what they can do together to increase their economic security and press for policy changes."

0 Replies
 
candide
 
  0  
Reply Sat 9 May, 2009 11:31 pm
@candide,
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/139881/after_u.s._strikes%2C_afghans_describe_%27tractor_trailers_full_of_pieces_of_human_bodies%27/?page=1
candide
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 May, 2009 11:39 pm
@candide,
Iraq= 61 billion $, 50,000 to 100,000 troops
Afganistan=65 billion $, 68,000 troops

Mercenary money/numbers unknown
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The president proposed 130 billion U.S. dollars in appropriation to support overseas military operations in fiscal year 2010 that begins Oct. 1, including 65 billion dollars for Afghanistan and 61 billion dollars for Iraq, according to his budget plan released by the White House.

http://www.pak-times.com/2009/05/09/obama-allocates-more-war-funds-for-afghanistan-than-iraq/

__________________________________________________
genoves
 
  -4  
Reply Sat 9 May, 2009 11:52 pm
@candide,
I need more information. I thought that BO had promised that all of our troops would be withdrawn from Iraq. Now, I understand that they will stay for an indefinite period.

I thought that no more American troops would lose their lives in Iraq. Instead, more have died since BO became president.

I thought that no more innocent people would be killed after BO was elected. Instead our drones have killed hundreds of non-combatants in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

There has been no change. BO promised change. Our troops are still at war!!!
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -4  
Reply Sun 10 May, 2009 02:11 am
@Setanta,
Setanta thinks that BO intends to nuke East LA. That is not correct. I have heard that he will lobotomize all morons who are so deprived of human companionship that they they post pictures of their ugly canine consorts.
candide
 
  2  
Reply Sun 10 May, 2009 11:11 am
@genoves,
Same clown different makeup.

When the people are on the brink of "HOPE AND CHANGE!" give it to them. Just don't give it to them. The republicans will give the government the Patriot act and Obama will work on the 2nd ammendment. The people will fight eachother and blame eachother while everything stays right on track.

Drone operations can go on as an Undeclared war while liberal moms swoon over the man of peace, Obama.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 May, 2009 02:07 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:

That makes him the first president to have control of both houses, then.


right! and everybody knows that it imperils our fine nation to have one party control the government.

why, why what would happen if one party controlled congress for 12 or 13 years??

it would be the end! the end! ooohhh... the end..

Laughing
genoves
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 11 May, 2009 02:29 am
@DontTreadOnMe,
Don't be too sure-Dont tread on me. If the Unemployment numbers continue to go up in the beginning of next year when the campaign season starts(and they will), BO will lose many seats in the House and some in the Senate--or are you too young to remember 1994 when Slick Willie's Health Plan was summarily rejected by the American people and the Republicans took over the House and Senate.

We will see. In the meanwhile, BO just doesn't know what to do about the moderate Democrats (led by Birch Bayh) who just will not accept his Socialist plans for the USA.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 May, 2009 04:01 am
@DontTreadOnMe,
Okay, I'll bite. Which president do you think had control of congress - regardless of party.
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 May, 2009 07:26 am
@roger,
Lyndon (landslide) Johnson
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 May, 2009 02:40 pm
@dyslexia,
Yeah. Maybe I should have asked which president that wasn't riding on the coattails of a popular, and recently assinated president.
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  0  
Reply Tue 12 May, 2009 02:47 am
Re: DontTreadOnMe (Post 3646771)
Don't be too sure-Dont tread on me. If the Unemployment numbers continue to go up in the beginning of next year when the campaign season starts(and they will), BO will lose many seats in the House and some in the Senate--or are you too young to remember 1994 when Slick Willie's Health Plan was summarily rejected by the American people and the Republicans took over the House and Senate.

We will see. In the meanwhile, BO just doesn't know what to do about the moderate Democrats (led by Birch Bayh) who just will not accept his Socialist plans for the USA.
kuvasz
 
  2  
Reply Tue 12 May, 2009 11:08 pm
@genoves,
That's Evan Bayh, idiot.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 01:33:01