33
   

When did Mexican become a "dirty" word?

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 09:44 pm
@dlowan,
Racists here just say "Asians"...
High Seas
 
  0  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 07:14 am
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

I'm not quite sure how one gets,
Quote:
(1) Still this is the first time I come across any Mexicans infuriated at being called "Spanish"

out of (2)
Quote:
(2) FBaezer post, this page:
.....the desire of not appearing blatantly racist causes this horrible prostitution of the language... and provokes a more generalized use of racist thought.
This is pseudo-PC Orwellian newspeak .

It's self-explanatory if you already know that FBaezer is a Mexican citizen and resident - he doesn't like being re-cast as "Spanish". Other Mexicans - perhaps because they're US residents - have adopted "Spanish" as a sort of generic for the apparently no-longer PC "hispanic" or "Mexican":
Quote:
...This list included the name of over 100 minors. It listed phone numbers, addresses and social security numbers and due dates (because more Spanish babies is a real threat).

http://able2know.org/topic/159099-1#post-4294308 [bold added]
====================================================
Edit - re-posting entire exchange at link above in case that discussion gets deleted from A2K:
http://able2know.org/topic/159099-1#post-4294308

Post: # 4,294,308 • Next
View Profileebrown p
ReplyQuotereport Sat 24 Jul, 2010 12:21 am
Teresa Basset is suspected of compiling a list of 1300 Utah residents with Spanish sounding last names (at least some of them are not illegal immigrants). She was a computer specialist working for the state, until she was fired. Apparently (and ironically) releasing personal information from state databases is illegal.

This list included the name of over 100 minors. It listed phone numbers, addresses and social security numbers and due dates (because more Spanish babies is a real threat).

I can't wait until her address is published. (I would love to send her a card.)
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 87 • Replies: 4
No top replies

Previous • Post: # 4,294,962 • Next
View Profile ebrown p

1
Reply Quote report Sat 24 Jul, 2010 06:52 pm
This story keeps getting weirder.

Some heretofore unknown group called "Concerned Citizens of the United States" sent the letter. They should be called "Concerned Cowards of the United States", seeing as they sent the letter anonymously and have now scurried back into their dark little corners like cockroaches.

The cover letter for this, published by the NY Times is rather strange. After declaring that they are not a "gang", "militia" or "terrorists, they claim they made the list with their impressive group of "legal Mexican nationals" working for them to "infiltrate their social networks". Of course it is now clear that this is a lie.

Teresa Bassett claims she wasn't behind the list... but a new organization received earlier letters from her before that matched style and specific phrases to the note that was sent anonymously from this group... evidently she is one of the Concerned Cowards. The fact that no one else from the group is speaking up to back her up speaks volumes.

Several independent news organizations have confirmed that some of the people on the list are not here illegally. All of them have Spanish sounding names...

Why are law-breaking bigots such big cowards?

Signature Everyone wants to go to heaven, but no one wants to die.
0 Replies

Previous • Post: # 4,294,965 • Next
View Profile Mame

1
Reply Quote report Sat 24 Jul, 2010 06:57 pm
519-278-6642
Signature Always be sincere, even if you don't mean it.
1 Reply

Previous • Post: # 4,294,979 • Next
View Profile ebrown p

1
Reply Quote report Sat 24 Jul, 2010 07:25 pm
@Mame,
Thank you Mame. Do you have her Social Security number?
Signature Everyone wants to go to heaven, but no one wants to die.
1 Reply

Previous • Post: # 4,294,980
View Profile Mame

1
Reply Quote report Sat 24 Jul, 2010 07:26 pm
@ebrown p,
417-887-907
Signature Always be sincere, even if you don't mean it.
0 Replies



djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 07:26 am
@dlowan,
funny, even though i know they are, i don't think of indians or pakistanis as being asian, i was referring more to folks from china, japan, vietnam, the philippines, thailand, and korea

i've seen and heard many folks lump them all together as chinese

people from the philippines sometimes get mistaken for people of spanish descent though
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 07:28 am
@dlowan,
this is true here as well

0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 07:34 am
@djjd62,
Quote:
people from the philippines sometimes get mistaken for people of spanish descent though


That makes sense...it was colonised by Spain before the US followed suit.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  0  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 07:36 am
@fbaezer,
Quote:
Mariachis don't wear sarapes, though (well, perhaps in the USA or in some tourist trap).



I've never seen Mariachi bands wear sarapes, in the US or in Mexico - how could they and still play their instruments? It'd be awful hard to play a trumpet or especially a violin in a sarape- your arms would keep getting tangled up in the fabric.

I bought my son two t-shirts that I thought were really funny when I was in Texas last month. One says: I didn't ask to be a Mexican - I just got lucky.
I got him that because I think people who have that sort of vivid cultural background ARE lucky. And he's interracial so he has brown skin and here in England, people might actually mistake him for Mexican.

The other one I got him says: "Relax Gringo - I'm here legally'
Laughing Laughing
I thought that was funny as we're immigrants here in England (and we are here legally).

I think everyone attaches their own meaning to terms. I was asking my brother in law if he though our niece might be gay...and he's getting all bent out of shape like I'm wondering if she's something bad because to him to be gay IS bad, I guess, and I just said, 'I'm not insulting her...as far as I'm concerned being gay is fine.'
And as far as I'm concerned - being Mexican is GOOD!

Over here though you hear some grumbling about the Polish people taking all the jobs - so it's all relative depending upon where exactly you live and what's going on there.

I don't think anyone escapes any of it.

0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 07:39 am
@djjd62,
I wonder if that is partially a regional thing.

In Toronto, because so much of the population is South Asian, people are fairly aware of whether people are from India, Pakistan, Goa, Sri Lanka etc.

What I've found occasionally amusing is when some Central Americans are thought to be from the Philipines. I suspect it has to do with the Spanish/native blend that is common to both regions.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 08:52 am
@dlowan,
I thought the racist term was "Orientals", I never thought of Asian as bad. What would be the ethnic group term?
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 08:55 am
@High Seas,
Quote:
It's self-explanatory if you already know that FBaezer is a Mexican citizen and resident - he doesn't like being re-cast as "Spanish". Other Mexicans - perhaps because they're US residents - have adopted "Spanish" as a sort of generic for the apparently no-longer PC "hispanic" or "Mexican":


"self-explanatory if you already know that ..."

What manner of scholarship is this? Even basic, simple honesty compels folk with that bent to provide enough information to explain their position.

Speaking of honesty, I have been long led to believe that I was on Ignore. Did one of your fellow spooks fill you in, HS?
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 09:15 am
@High Seas,
High Seas wrote:

Other Mexicans - perhaps because they're US residents - have adopted "Spanish" as a sort of generic for the apparently no-longer PC "hispanic" or "Mexican":

These "other Mexicans" to which you refer are few and far between. The vast majority of Mexicans would range between infuriation and annoyance in their reaction to being referred to as Spanish.
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 09:26 am
@Green Witch,
Green Witch wrote:

I thought the racist term was "Orientals", I never thought of Asian as bad. What would be the ethnic group term?


The word isn't bad...racists just use it as such.

Just like Mexican.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 09:27 am
@dlowan,
dlowan wrote:

Green Witch wrote:

I thought the racist term was "Orientals", I never thought of Asian as bad. What would be the ethnic group term?


The word isn't bad...racists just use it as such.

The local racists I know use much worse words than that for "Oriental" people.
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 09:32 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

dlowan wrote:

Green Witch wrote:

I thought the racist term was "Orientals", I never thought of Asian as bad. What would be the ethnic group term?


The word isn't bad...racists just use it as such.

The local racists I know use much worse words than that for "Oriental" people.


Okay we're talking tone again.
I remember when Benjamin Moore changed one of my favorite paint colors from "Oriental Silk" to "Corn Silk". It seemed a bit like Freedom Fries at the time.
High Seas
 
  0  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 09:59 am
@Green Witch,
Green Witch wrote:
...Okay we're talking tone again.
I remember when Benjamin Moore changed one of my favorite paint colors from "Oriental Silk" to "Corn Silk". It seemed a bit like Freedom Fries at the time.

You can call it tone, but we're talking about FBaezer's post "This is pseudo-PC Orwellian newspeak" echoing Orwell's terrible warning on losing our integrity through using PC language. In “Politics and the English Language" Orwell makes the danger of such "PC" phrases explicit, in that they
[quote]....will construct your sentences for you—even think your thoughts for you, to a certain extent—and at need they will perform the important service of partially concealing your meaning even from yourself…. [/quote]
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  0  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 10:05 am
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

"self-explanatory if you already know that ..."

What manner of scholarship is this? Even basic, simple honesty compels folk with that bent to provide enough information to explain their position.

Speaking of honesty, I have been long led to believe that I was on Ignore. Did one of your fellow spooks fill you in, HS?

All my settings and my A2K password vanished following a software re-write while I was away - sorry about forgetting to add you back to my ignore list, and rest assured I've just corrected that omission. As to Mr Baezer, I thought you knew all your fellow leftists online, my mistake Smile
JTT
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 10:17 am
@High Seas,
You are such a bullshitter, High Seas, and what's so funny, you aren't even good at disguising it.

How was your big "overseas assignment"? This one sure didn't last long.

Those STDs sure can put a crimp in a girl's plans, can't they?
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  0  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 11:30 am
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

High Seas wrote:

Other Mexicans - perhaps because they're US residents - have adopted "Spanish" as a sort of generic for the apparently no-longer PC "hispanic" or "Mexican":

These "other Mexicans" to which you refer are few and far between. The vast majority of Mexicans would range between infuriation and annoyance in their reaction to being referred to as Spanish.

I certainly hope you're right, because I share Orwell's utter revulsion with newspeak of any sort. In his day though the link between PC language and the deaths of millions (murdered by Stalin and his fellow communists) was only metaphorical - in our day it's only too literally concrete. AIDS epidemiology is the most striking example I know of: for decades it's been known that the ones most at danger were homosexual men, prostitutes, intraveinous drug users, and people with African DNA. Instead of focusing on protecting these groups, though, the criminal PC brigades babbled on interminably about a "pandemic" where "everyone was at risk". That was PC-newspeak lies. Tens of millions of deaths later science finally prevails:
http://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/images/images-magazine/2010/30/ST/201030STD001.jpg
http://www.economist.com/node/16635916
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 01:17 pm
@High Seas,
Quote:
I certainly hope you're right, because I share Orwell's utter revulsion with newspeak of any sort.


You mean like what the US government tells you, for example Reagan's newspeak about the Contras being like the founding fathers versus what actually happens on the ground.

Quote:
I don't mean to abuse you with verbal violence, but you have to understand what your [US] government and its agents are doing. They go into villages, they haul out families. With the children forced to watch they castrate the father, they peel the skin off his face, they put a grenade in his mouth and pull the pin. With the children forced to watch they gang-rape the mother, and slash her breasts off. And sometimes for variety, they make the parents watch while they do these things to the children.


http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Stockwell/StockwellCIA87_2.html


You mention Stalin and the millions he murdered. But there's no mention of the millions that the USA has murdered. Is this some of the newspeak that you find so revolting?

Have you considered that you might a hypocrite of monstrous proportions?

Quote:

Targeting North Korea

By Gregory Elich

http://www.iacenter.org/Koreafiles/korea_elich.html

The North Koreans had ample cause to fear such aggressive posturing, based on bitter memories of their last experience with the U.S. military during the 1950-3 Korean War.

In the first year of that war, on November 5, 1950, General Douglas MacArthur ordered the destruction of "every means of communication, every installation, factory, city and village" in an area stretching from the Yalu River to the battle line. The first city to be leveled was Sinuiju, and napalm soon began to be employed during bombing raids against civilians. Over 2,300 gallons of napalm were dropped on Pyongyang in one raid alone, in July 1952.

Mass fire bombings systematically wiped out one town after another,

WAR CRIME - PURPOSEFULLY TARGETTING CIVILIANS

and U.S. planes also targeted power stations and irrigation dams that supported rice fields. As irrigation dams were destroyed, villages downstream were swept away in the resulting floods, inflicting enormous death and destruction.

WAR CRIME - PURPOSEFULLY TARGETING CIVILIANS

At various times during the war, the U.S. even considered use of tactical nuclear weapons.

Hungarian correspondent Tibor Meray witnessed the "destruction and horrible things committed by the American forces. Everything which moved in North Korea was a military target, peasants in the fields were often machine gunned by pilots" motivated by what seemed to him amusement.

WAR CRIME - PURPOSEFULLY TARGETING CIVILIANS

Meray saw "complete devastation between the Yalu River and the capital" of North Korea. There were "no more cities in North Korea," he reported. Every city Meray passed through "was a collection of chimneys. I don’t know why houses collapsed and chimneys did not, but I went through a city of 200,000 inhabitants and I saw thousands of chimneys and that was all."

General William Dean, taken prisoner during the war, remembered being amazed at the sight of the city of Huichon. "The city I’d seen before – two storied buildings, a prominent main street – wasn’t there anymore," while "most of the towns were just rubble or snowy open spaces where buildings had been." All of these towns, he said, "once full of people, were unoccupied shells. The villagers lived in entirely new temporary villages, hidden in canyons."


Executions of civilians occurred on a mass scale, both by American troops and by U.S.-installed South Korean President Syngman Rhee’s forces. As U.S. soldiers were pushed out of North Korea by advancing Chinese and North Korean troops, they deliberately destroyed everything in their path. The war diary of the 24th Infantry Division relates, "Razing of villages along our withdrawal routes and destruction of food staples became the order of the day."

ADMITTED WAR CRIMES - PURPOSEFULLY TARGETTING CIVILIANS

A Chinese soldier remembers that virtually no house was left standing and that the region was filled with homeless people during the winter of 1950-1 when temperatures dropped to 40 below zero.


According to General Curtis LeMay, "We burned down just about every city in North and South Korea both," and "we killed off over a million civilian Koreans and drove several million more from their homes."

WAR CRIME - PURPOSEFULLY TARGETTING CIVILIANS - the war criminal of WWII, Curtis Lemay was pressed into service to continue his war crimes against North Korean civilians. In the eyes of the American government and the military establishment, he performed admirably.

What say you, Cy, FailuresArt, MM, Okie, Ican, Firefly, do you consider him to have lived up to the high standards set by others in their military incursions into poor defenseless countries?

During the war, North Korean responded to such terror tactics by building underground factories and housing on a large scale. (12) North Korean concerns over U.S. threats are routinely dismissed as over-sensitivity, but such a view can only be sustained by ignorance of the history of the Korean War.

The North Koreans haven’t forgotten the experience, building many post-war factories and military facilities underground. It should be pointed out that such underground facilities fall into the second category of targets the Bush Administration identifies as justifying the use of nuclear weapons: targets able to withstand non-nuclear attack.

same old same old WAR CRIMES - PURPOSEFULLY INTENDING TO TARGETING CIVILIANS[/color]


See,

http://able2know.org/topic/159135-1




0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 01:54 pm
@Green Witch,
Green Witch wrote:

I thought the racist term was "Orientals", I never thought of Asian as bad. What would be the ethnic group term?


Go back far enough and you will find the term WOG - Worthy Oriental Gentleman, and it was not used respectfully.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 01:59 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

These "other Mexicans" to which you refer are few and far between. The vast majority of Mexicans would range between infuriation and annoyance in their reaction to being referred to as Spanish.


Spanish used to be preferred, back when New Mexico was called New Spain. It distinguished between the earlier settlers and the later immigrants. For all I know, it may still be preferred in the San Luis Valley of Colorado and the villages of the Sangre de Cristo.
 

Related Topics

There is a word for that! - Discussion by wandeljw
Best Euphemism for death and dying.... - Discussion by tsarstepan
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Question by lululucy
phrase/name of male seducer - Question by Zah03
Shameful sexist languge must be banned! - Question by neologist
Three Word Phrase I REALLY Hate to See - Discussion by hawkeye10
Is History an art or a science? - Question by Olivier5
"Rooms" in a cave - Question by shua
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 11:33:26