9
   

CBS newsman's $70m lawsuit likely to deal Bush legacy a new blow

 
 
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 10:39 am
CBS newsman's $70m lawsuit likely to deal Bush legacy a new blow
by Christopher Goodwin in Los Angeles
The Observer, Sunday 28 December 2008

As George W Bush prepares to leave the White House, at least one unpleasant episode from his unpopular presidency is threatening to follow him into retirement.

A $70m lawsuit filed by Dan Rather, the veteran former newsreader for CBS Evening News, against his old network is reopening the debate over alleged favourable treatment that Bush received when he served in the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam war. Bush had hoped that this controversy had been dealt with once and for all during the 2004 election.

Eight weeks before the 2004 presidential poll, Rather broadcast a story based on newly discovered documents which appeared to show that Bush, whose service in the Texas Air National Guard ensured that he did not have to fight in Vietnam, had barely turned up even for basic duty. After an outcry from the White House and conservative bloggers who claimed that the report had been based on falsified documents, CBS retracted the story, saying that the documents' authenticity could not be verified. Rather, who had been with CBS for decades and was one of the most familiar faces in American journalism, was fired by the network the day after the 2004 election.

He claims breach of contract against CBS. He has already spent $2m on his case, which is likely to go to court early next year. Rather contends not only that his report was true - "What the documents stated has never been denied, by the president or anyone around him," he says - but that CBS succumbed to political pressure from conservatives to get the report discredited and to have him fired. He also claims that a panel set up by CBS to investigate the story was packed with conservatives in an effort to placate the White House. Part of the reason for that, he suggests, was that Viacom, a sister company of CBS, knew that it would have important broadcasting regulatory issues to deal with during Bush's second term.

Among those CBS considered for the panel to investigate Rather's report were far-right broadcasters Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter.

"CBS broke with long-standing tradition at CBS News and elsewhere of standing up to political pressure," says Rather. "And, there's no joy in saying it, they caved ... in an effort to placate their regulators in Washington."

Rather's lawsuit makes other serious allegations about CBS succumbing to political pressure in an attempt to suppress important news stories. In particular, he says that his bosses at CBS tried to stop him reporting evidence of torture at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. According to Rather's lawsuit, "for weeks they refused to grant permission to air the story" and "continued to raise the goalposts, insisting on additional substantiation". Rather also claims that General Richard Meyers, then head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top military official in the US, called him at home and asked him not to broadcast the story, saying that it would "endanger national security".

Rather says that CBS only agreed to allow him to broadcast the story when it found out that Seymour Hersh would be writing about it in the New Yorker magazine. Even then, Rather claims, CBS tried to bury it. "CBS imposed the unusual restrictions that the story would be aired only once, that it would not be preceded by on-air promotion, and that it would not be referenced on the CBS Evening News," he says.

The charges outlined in Rather's lawsuit will cast a further shadow over the Bush legacy. He recently expressed regret for the "failed intelligence" which led to the invasion of Iraq and has received heavy criticism over the scale and depth of the economic downturn in the United States.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 9 • Views: 1,180 • Replies: 24
No top replies

 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 10:52 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
What does this have to do with Bush?
Rather made a stupid mistake and got caught.

He did it to himself, the Bush admin didnt do it to him.
0 Replies
 
Woiyo9
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 11:19 am
Sounds like a desperate man is desperately trying to regain relevance.

Get out Dan!
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 12:15 pm
Sounds to me Rather is a very good journalist and he exposed the corruption and paranoia of CBS and near erstwhile president Bush. I hope he wins the lawsuit.
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 12:40 pm
@NickFun,
I agree, NickFun. CBS's shameful behavior does not enhance the Press' constitutional protection.

BBB
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 12:44 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
The charges outlined in Rather's lawsuit will cast a further shadow over the Bush legacy.

What a trough of poo.
0 Replies
 
tenderfoot
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 05:34 pm
I couldn't agree more -- what's the good of throwing perfectly good pooh, over a disgustingly poor sniveling excuse of a president when he's been wallowing in it for the past 8 years-- throw it down the toilet where it'll do something more usfull.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 06:10 pm
At last. Rather has the opportunity to be vindicated.
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 11:46 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
At last. Rather has the opportunity to be vindicated.

Side bet?
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 12:22 pm
Dan Rather's HDNet special news documentaries are a step up from being a news anchor for CBS. It remains to be seen what comes out of the lawsuit, but it can't be good for the Shrub.

http://www.hd.net/danrather.html

Woiyo9
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 12:59 pm
@Lightwizard,
Rolling Eyes Why?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 01:08 pm
@Ticomaya,
I don't have enough information to make a bet worth the effort. However, I had been convinced for some years that some variation of Dan Rather's strory is the truth and always will believe that way.
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 01:24 pm
@edgarblythe,
A bet is moot on a public forum -- perhaps there is an online casino these people can go on and see if there is a money to be made off of betting that underestimating the intelligence of the Shrub's dead end supporters is a good bet.


Why what? Why is Dan Rather's series on HD Net superior to the CBS nightly news and 60 Minutes or why is more media coverage and the idea that the Shrub could be called in as a witness not good for the president's legacy? Can there be anything that will tip the administration's reputation over a cliff? It will only take a feather.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 01:31 pm
I knew the sort of man Bush is before he became Texas governor. He has always met my expectations.
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 01:39 pm
@Lightwizard,
Lightwizard wrote:
A bet is moot on a public forum -- perhaps there is an online casino these people can go on and see if there is a money to be made off of betting that underestimating the intelligence of the Shrub's dead end supporters is a good bet.

I think you meant "misunderestimating."

rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 03:13 pm
Who would I believe? Bush the consumate lier or Rather a newsman who referanced all his sources.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 05:12 pm
@rabel22,
I guess then that all the people (including CBS editors) who determined the evidence was bogs are liars too.

Rather has one of largest egos in an idustry known for its conceit.

Bush doesn't require vindication and it matters little if the suit once again proves the CBS evidence was bogus there are certain people who continue to believe what they want to believe.

The Bush legacy will have nothing to do with his service in the National Guard, just as Clinton's will have nothing to do with his draft dodging.


0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 05:20 pm
@NickFun,
NickFun wrote:

Sounds to me Rather is a very good journalist and he exposed the corruption and paranoia of CBS and near erstwhile president Bush. I hope he wins the lawsuit.




It's going to be very interesting to hear the evidence. He sounds pretty convinced he has ggood evidence if he is spending this much of what I presume is his own money.

Anyone know when it is getting to court?
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 05:57 pm
@Ticomaya,
No. It's hypothetical and facetious since there's no description of the odds but it would more likely be overestimating that would loose the bet.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 11:34 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
I knew the sort of man Bush is before he became Texas governor. He has always met my expectations.


And the "caliber" of the people in this thread defending him shows you to be dead on the mark, Edgar.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » CBS newsman's $70m lawsuit likely to deal Bush legacy a new blow
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 02:28:50