Reply
Wed 24 Sep, 2003 07:52 am
Quote:The Bush administration has quietly told Congress that it should not provide Medicare drug benefits to six million poor elderly and disabled people because they are already eligible for similar help through state Medicaid programs.
Administration officials said they were siding with the Senate, against the House and all 50 governors on one of the most divisive issues in the Medicare legislation. A major issue of principle and large amounts of money are at stake. The principle, rooted in the history of Medicare, is that all benefits are generally available to all beneficiaries, regardless of their income.
Under the House version of the legislation, the new drug benefit would be available to all 40 million Medicare beneficiaries, including 6.2 million who are also eligible for Medicaid, the insurance program for low-income people. By contrast, the Senate bill denies Medicare drug benefits to people eligible for both programs. They would have to rely on Medicaid for assistance with their drug costs.
Although states are not required to provide drug benefits under Medicaid, all have chosen to do so. Medicaid has historically provided extensive drug benefits, but they vary widely from state to state, and in recent years states have reduced the coverage in an effort to hold down soaring costs.
NY Times
Your comments, please....
Did anyone really think this would go over with the robber-barrons in charge?
If Medicaid pays for all drugs and doctor visits, why would a person need Medicare, also?
Sofia wrote:If Medicaid pays for all drugs and doctor visits, why would a person need Medicare, also?
Because it doesn't, sweetie...
Last line of post above:
Quote:Medicaid has historically provided extensive drug benefits, but they vary widely from state to state, and in recent years states have reduced the coverage in an effort to hold down soaring costs.
I think this is a subject which will come back to bite all politicians, Repubs and Dems, at state and federal level . . . the drug companies are robbing us blind, and that's just fine with the bunch who get significant contributions from them, which dwarf what ordinary citizens give them. As long as this was not on the table, they were safe in their cozy relations with drug companies. Now, this is an issue which won't go away, and the theivery of the drug companies will become more apparent, and as states spend more and more on prescription programs, and if the feds get in the game, more scrutiny will focus on the drug companies, and the politicians they underwrite. Could be a political land mine for all concerned; could be i'm completely wrong about this. We'll see.
Of course, the very fact that he called himself a compassionate conservative when running shows that compassion is a little thin in conservative ranks.
the issue of medicaid over medicare is who pays for it. the White House proposal (following the Senate) would transfer costs from the feds to the states.