@boomerang,
Quote:
But why?
Clearly this is a little kiid.
Its a distinction without a difference in principle.
From my remembering being that age
and from my remembering kids of that age by whom I was surrounded,
I am 100% confident that
(unless he had some odd mental impairment that most kids don 't have)
he fully knew and understood what he was doing
and he did it because chose to be a murderer.
In other words, he opted to include murder among the instruments
that he used to conform his environment to his wishes.
He thought that mendacity and deception woud save him from retributive justice.
The sweetness and beauty of children shoud not cause us to deny reality.
If he had not understood the crime that he committed,
he woud not have tried to lie his way out of it; his endeavor to escape
is indicative of perceived guilt.
Saying that he is just a little kid
is as pointless as saying that some other killer was 30 not 50;
it does not make a difference, as it woud if he were so young
as not to be able to walk or talk; if such a person caused the death
of another it must be deemed an accident.
David