0
   

Your Congress INACTION - Bailout Lacks Oversight Despite Billions Pledged

 
 
Woiyo9
 
Reply Thu 13 Nov, 2008 08:27 am
"By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 13, 2008; A01

In the six weeks since lawmakers approved the Treasury's massive bailout of financial firms, the government has poured money into the country's largest banks, recruited smaller banks into the program and repeatedly widened its scope to cover yet other types of businesses, from insurers to consumer lenders.

Along the way, the Bush administration has committed $290 billion of the $700 billion rescue package.

Yet for all this activity, no formal action has been taken to fill the independent oversight posts established by Congress when it approved the bailout to prevent corruption and government waste. Nor has the first monitoring report required by lawmakers been completed, though the initial deadline has passed.

"It's a mess," said Eric M. Thorson, the Treasury Department's inspector general, who has been working to oversee the bailout program until the newly created position of special inspector general is filled. "I don't think anyone understands right now how we're going to do proper oversight of this thing."

In approving the rescue package, lawmakers trumpeted provisions in the legislation that established layers of independent scrutiny, including a special inspector general to be nominated by the White House and a congressional oversight panel to be named by lawmakers themselves."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/12/AR2008111202846_pf.html

Does anyone really have confidence in either Pelosi or Reid to be effective leaders?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,056 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Nov, 2008 08:33 am
Not really, I wish they would pick other people in the party to be in both positions.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Thu 13 Nov, 2008 08:35 am
@Woiyo9,
Woiyo,

In case you didn't realize it, Treasury is under the control of the executive branch. Filling the position of "special inspector general" is the responsibility of Bush. It seems Bush isn't following the law in appointments and reports. But that means it's Pelosi's and Reid's fault? Congressional oversight is restricted to what the administration is willing to go along with. If the administration fails to live up to it, Congress can file suit or stop funding the program. There isn't much else they can do once they have handed over the money.
Woiyo9
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Nov, 2008 08:55 am
@parados,
BULLSHIT!!!!

In approving the rescue package, lawmakers trumpeted provisions in the legislation that established layers of independent scrutiny, including a special inspector general to be nominated by the White House and a congressional oversight panel to be named by lawmakers themselves.

Stop apologizing for the Dummycrats in power and stop the blame Bush bullshit.

It was lack of congressional oversight for the past 20 years that has helped create the mess we are in today. Yet, all you can come up with is blame Bush? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Your Congress INACTION - Bailout Lacks Oversight Despite Billions Pledged
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 01:26:12