Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 02:42 pm
@Woiyo9,
Woiyo9 wrote:

They have the right to apply same as I, except not to each other.

If we has steak we could have steak and eggs if we had eggs.
Woiyo9 wrote:

This is a social issue, not a legal issue.

So let them marry and let it be a social issue.
Woiyo9 wrote:

The citizens HAVE THE RIGHT to determine how we want to structure our society and the citizens of this Nation have decided a marriage is defined as between one man and one woman.

Even a consensus can not make the world flat or 1+1=4.
Woiyo9 wrote:

NO COURT should over-ride the will of the people on social issues.

The hell it shouldn't! If the court had not had this power, our country would have been in a sorry state.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 03:12 pm
@Woiyo9,
Quote:

NO COURT should over-ride the will of the people on social issues.


Idiotic and asinine. Almost every issue is a 'social issue.' What you describe is the exact opposite of the way our founders intended the Judicial branch to work.

Cycloptichorn
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 03:41 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

Woiyo9 wrote:

NO COURT should over-ride the will of the people on social issues.


Idiotic and asinine. Almost every issue is a 'social issue.' What you describe is the exact opposite of the way our founders intended the Judicial branch to work.

Cycloptichorn


Forgive them . . . they know not what they do? I think not.

The ignorance and arrogance of some of the "people" (like Woiyo9, et al.) who insist on abusing the power of the government to oppress other people is unforgiveable. They choose to be ignorant and they proudly wallow that in that ignorance like pigs in their favorite sty.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 04:08 pm
@Debra Law,
I believe some strange things happens to people of religion, but especially here in the US. They can't seem to see or grasp the simplest concepts such as "equality." It's really amazing how that works, because many have the ability to conceptualize more difficult lessons in philosophy and logic.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 06:17 pm
@cicerone imposter,
the goal of equality was always unobtainable, as as the problems for society pile up pouring energy into trying to reach equality seems like frivolity. Now is the time to separate the wheat from the chaff anyways, those who are contributing to the society are good, those who are draining from the society are bad. If for instance having kids grow up in gay homes is going to place a burden on society then my response is that we can't mess with that right now. If gaining gay rights going to be a fight and need to be endlessly debated then we don't have the time right now, we have more important things to worry about than whether gays get what they want. Their desires for more from this society can wait, and should wait.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 06:41 pm
@hawkeye10,
Wrong approach: equality and freedom of choice should be based on the same standards as "all in the society." When you begin to identify certain groups as not deserving of equality based on anyone's subjective weaknesses, you ignore the weaknesses of the group that are crying "wolf." Heterosexual marriage "may" produce children, but that doesn't mean they raise their children responsibly. Heterosexual marriages end up in divorce about 50% of the time. What's so "sacred" about marriage? Some parents rape their own children.

The only fair way to determine equality is on its own merits. If two people love each other and wish to share their love in the same way heterosexual couples enjoy the legal rights of property and care, then that is the fundamental "right" of those couples. The only question should be "who does it harm?" Does the parent who rape their child harm you? Does the parent who mistreat their children harm you? If so, how? When a heterosexual couple with children divorce, how does it harm you?

Your belief that "standard of equality is unattainable" is BS. You just haven't learned about the progress made in this country about equal rights.

Your ignorance is amazing. Did you know that we just elected a black for president of the US?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 06:58 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Does the parent who rape their child harm you? Does the parent who mistreat their children harm you? If so, how? When a heterosexual couple with children divorce, how does it harm you?
Child abuse tends to produce injured and not fully functioning adults, it is a detriment to society and not just to those whom are abused. Ditto the products of broken homes. That is why we have child protective services and why courts order that divorces pursue The best interests of the children before the best interests of the divorcing adults.. If children form gay homes (and this is not proven one way or the other because we refuse to apply science to the question because we don't want to know the answer) suffer from gender confusion or grow up lacking an education in the masculine/feminine dynamic which is required for maintaining a quality heterosexual relationship as an adult then society not only has the right to apply protective measures, but a responsibility to do so.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 07:02 pm
@hawkeye10,
Children raised by gay couples do not suffer from "gender confusion." That's your imagination running on over-drive. Show us studies of what you opine?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 07:02 pm
@hawkeye10,
When does government have to apply "protective" services against gay couples?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 07:06 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Are Children Raised by Lesbian Couples "Normal?"
Uploaded by ajay on Mar 28, 2005
"Children reared by lesbian couples are just as well-adjusted as kids of heterosexual couples."

That was the lead line in a story posted by the Associated Press on April 3, 1997. My question upon reading this headline is, why is this news? Why is it so hard for people to believe that lesbian couples can raise happy, healthy kids? Not one study, but three, were done to prove this rather obvious finding. Not only did the lesbians in these studies raise normal kids, a researcher at the University of Virginia says you can't tell them apart using standard psychological tests. Normal kids, raised in lesbian homes, wow.

To the researchers I say, thanks for proving the painfully obvious. Those who think children will turn out sick and twisted living in lesbian homes need to visit a few. I can understand the stereotype. Maybe they think we'll constantly be having sex in front of the kid, or telling them how evil men are. Well, anyone who has been married awhile knows sex is the first thing to go, and as for the evil factor of men (or people in general) that's something children tend to pick up on their own without help from parents.

Case in point: I told my oldest sister that my partner and I were planning on having a child soon. She said, "I wouldn't raise a child in that environment." Well, what environment is that? One where the child is carefully planned for, wanted, loved and provided for by two committed and caring adults? She's right!! How stupid could we have been. When there are so many children out there living with single parents, or in some socially-acceptable heterosexual households that are filled with psychological and physical abuse, how could we have been so selfish as to think we could raise a child better than (or at least as well as) heterosexuals? "You know what I mean," she snapped. No, I honestly don't know what she means.

People often believe being raised in a home full of gay people will make you turn gay. Well, I for one, was raised in a home full of heterosexuals and somehow it didn't rub off on me. Lord knows they tried to make me straight, but you can't mess with what God gave you. If a lesbian's child is heterosexual, nothing the lesbian mother does will make them gay.

Another objection I have faced as I've contemplated raising children: "How will they deal with the prejudice and teasing from kids at school?" Well, the obvious answer here is it would not be a problem if other parents didn't teach their kids to be prejudiced. I intend to teach my child that everyone is different. That's not a value judgment, it is mere fact. My child's family will be different from other children's families. We are no better, we are no worse, we are just different. Keep your opinions (and your misguided Bible quotes) off my life, thank you very much.

Teaching tolerance is key for parents. Kids get their world view from their parents. Most studies done on children raised in lesbian or gay homes show the children are often more tolerant of others than children raised in heterosexual homes. The children are taught to not judge others and remain open-minded in unfamiliar situations.

Some of the more interesting findings in these studies is how involved both parents are in lesbian parenting arrangements versus heterosexual couples. For example:
· 90% of the lesbian co-parents assumed the common child-raising tasks. Only about 37% of the fathers in heterosexual couples, however, took an active role.
· In disciplining the children, 60% of the lesbian co-parents took an active role, while it was only 20% of the fathers in heterosexual families. (Readers Digest, 1999)

Wouldn't Dr. Laura be proud to find so many lesbians are their kids' moms in very active ways?

These studies included women who had children by artificial insemination. Let me just state plainly, getting pregnant this way is more challenging than lowering the lights and opening a bottle of wine. You must take your temperature, guage ovulation, and get to the sperm as fast as possible. It can take months. With this type of dedication to having a child, you can bet there are no UNWANTED children in the lesbian community. There are no accidental children, there are only WANTED and LOVED children of homosexuals.

Generally, I'm very glad to see researchers are taking the reality of lesbian parents seriously enough to study them. It proves what lesbians already know ... we can be good parents, and proves to the world at large what they may not know ... lesbians can be good parents.

True, parenting is not a skill easily mastered. Not everyone is good at it, and all parents make mistakes. A parent's sexual orientation, however, has nothing to do with how good of a parent they are. Parents, of all sexual orientations, are people, fallible and weak. Raising children takes patience, time and money. Lesbians and straights alike may have varying degrees of these resources, but turn out good kids everyday. Lesbian parents are not the norm, but as these studies show, their kids are normal. We must remember Jeff Dahmer's parents were heterosexual, so were Charles Manson's. I can't cite an example of a serial killer or other freak raised by lesbians. Does this prove we're better? No, probably not, but it proves no parent is perfect, gay or straight.

Sexual orientation of the parent has littleS to do with how children turn out.
Parents are responsible for teaching their children how to live with integrity, pride and love. They need to know how to balance their ambition with the needs of others. They need self-confidence and the knowledge that their parents love them unconditionally. These are taught by example. That depends of the depth of character of the parent, not the sex of the person they take to bed each night. I'm sure there are "bad" lesbian mothers, just as there are "bad" heterosexual parents. Being a heterosexual parent doesn't make you a better parent, just a more socially acceptable one.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 07:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I was speaking of protecting the kids living with gays if we find out that these kids are harmed from being in that situation. we need to know, studies should be done to find out. What has been done is minimal, as mostly low quality science.

However, if being gay is even partly a learned behaviour, and increasing numbers of gays would make our already bad gender confusion problem worse, then societal best interest is served by not only making it more difficult for gays to have kids in their homes, but also by discouraging gay unions in the first place.

At any rate, deciding the gay marriage question before we do the scientific study of the ramifications of overt gay behaviour on the society is dumb. Let us know what we are talking about, and what we are signing on for, before we decide.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 07:15 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

the goal of equality was always unobtainable, as as the problems for society pile up pouring energy into trying to reach equality seems like frivolity.

You have a weak mind. Unobtainable? You lack the will.
hawkeye10 wrote:

Now is the time to separate the wheat from the chaff anyways, those who are contributing to the society are good, those who are draining from the society are bad.

Plenty of heterosexual couples fall into the "chaff." You'll let them marry. How is it that you think that gays don't contribute to society?
hawkeye10 wrote:

If for instance having kids grow up in gay homes is going to place a burden on society then my response is that we can't mess with that right now. If gaining gay rights going to be a fight and need to be endlessly debated then we don't have the time right now, we have more important things to worry about than whether gays get what they want. Their desires for more from this society can wait, and should wait.

"Wait" says the man who will not have to wait.

Gays don't put a burden on society.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 07:21 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
If children form gay homes (and this is not proven one way or the other because we refuse to apply science to the question because we don't want to know the answer) suffer from gender confusion or grow up lacking an education in the masculine/feminine dynamic which is required for maintaining a quality heterosexual relationship as an adult then society not only has the right to apply protective measures, but a responsibility to do so.


It's you who doesn't want to know the answer. It would ruin your ability to promote the conflict. Plenty of people study the psychology and sociology of homosexuals. Many have studied the children of homosexual homes. You call it low level science because you refuse the conclusion you already made.

If being gay is part a learned behavior, then look at the many gays in the world already today that come from good-old-fashioned-Christian homes and who were raised on the "good book." It would seems that if the presence of heterosexuals is irrelevant to that mental conditioning that you (nor anone else for that matter) have yet to prove.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 08:44 pm
Quote:
The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children
Mark McConnell, MD, FAAP, FCCP
Pediatric Intensive Care
St Luke's Children's Hospital
Boise, ID 83712
To the Editor."

I read with great concern the article entitled "The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of Children."1 This article seemed to be published more for political expediency than for its scientific contribution to the practice of pediatrics. I believe that this article is pseudoscientific because it does not share any original research and its review of the medical literature regarding the impact of homosexuality on children, families, and society is significantly biased. This article would have been better suited for the commentary section of Pediatrics.

Although the first part of the article is presented as an unbiased review of marriage laws, the reader is certainly left with the impression that such laws are unfair or discriminatory toward homosexual couples, although these laws were passed by a majority of the legislators or voting public. The second half of the article is a biased review of the literature regarding the outcomes of children raised in homosexual relationships. Even a cursory review of the literature on homosexuality would demonstrate the significant negative health consequences of the homosexual lifestyle with its resulting burdens on the family. The authors do not give a balanced review, nor do they highlight the significant methodologic problems in the studies they do present.2"4

Previous research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transsexual (LGBT) people has demonstrated that LGBT people as a whole (1) have a much higher incidence of drug addiction to methamphetamines and cocaine than heterosexuals,5,6 (2) were more likely to be victims of domestic violence,5,6 (3) were twice as likely to be on psychotropic medications,5,7 (4) have higher incidence of non-HIV sexually transmitted diseases,8 and (5) have a significantly increased risk of suicidal ideation and suicide completion.7,9 In addition, homosexual men have a life expectancy that is 8 to 20 years less than heterosexual men10,11 and are much less likely to be involved in monogamous relationships.12 Also, legal homosexual marriages in Norway and Sweden were more likely to end in divorce than heterosexual marriages.13 The Pawelski et al study fails to address the implications of these facts on the well-being of children.

In addition, the article fails to acknowledge multiple studies that date back to the work of Erik Eriksen that demonstrate that the input of both a mother and father are important for the normal psychosocial development of children.13"15 Research has also demonstrated that children raised in homes with intact heterosexual marriages do better psychosocially and educationally than children raised in other settings, including single-parent homes, step-family homes, or in homes with homosexual relationships.16,17


REFERENCES


Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM, et al. The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children. Pediatrics. 2006;118 :349 "364[Free Full Text]
Schumm WR. What was really learned from Tasker and Golombok's (1995) study of lesbian and single parent mothers? Psychol Rep. 2004;94 :422 "424[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Lerner R, Nagai AK. No Basis: What the Studies Don't Tell Us About Same-Sex Parenting. Washington, DC: Marriage Law Project; 2001
Rekers G, Kilgus M. Studies of homosexual parenting: a critical review. Regent Univ Law Rev. 2001"2002;14 :343 "382
Cochran BN, Cauce AM. Characteristics of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals entering substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30 :135 "146[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Pitts M, Smith A, Mitchell A, Patel S. Private Lives: A Report on the Health and Wellbeing of GLBTI Australians. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Australian Research Center in Sex, Health & Society; 2006
Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Beautrais AL. Is sexual orientation related to mental health problems and suicidality in young people? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56 :876 "880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Mosher WD, Chandra A, Jones J. Sexual behavior and selected health measures: men and women 15"44 years of age, United States, 2002. Adv Data. 2005;(362) :1 "55[Medline]
Herrell R, Goldberg J, True WR, et al. Sexual orientation and suicidality. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56 :867 "874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Hogg RS, Strathdee SA, Craib KJ, O'Shaughnessy MV, Montaner JS, Schechter MT. Modelling the impact of HIV disease on mortality in gay and bisexual men. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26 :657 "661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Van de Ven P, Rodden P, Crawford J, Kippax S. A comparative demographic and sexual profile of older homosexually active men. J Sex Res. 1997;34 :354
Andersson G, Noack T, Weedon-Fekjar H. Divorce risk patterns in same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden. Presented at: annual meeting of the Population Association of America. April 1"3, 2004; Boston, Massachusetts
Byrd AD. Gender complementarity and child-rearing: where tradition and science agree. Available at: www.narth.com/docs/gendercomplementarity.html. Accessed September 11, 2006
Pruett KD. The paternal presence. Fam Soc. 1993;74 :46 "54[ISI]
Cabrera NJ, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Bradley RH, Hofferth S, Lamb ME. Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Dev. 2000;71 :127 "136[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sarantakos S. Children in three contexts: family, education and social development. Child Aust. 1996;21 :23 "31
Manning WD, Lamb KA. Adolescent well-being in cohabitating, married, and single-parent families. J Marriage Fam. 2003;65 :876 "893[CrossRef][ISI

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/5/2259?rss=1

it is fact that all of the studies done to date are on kids who where born of a heterosexual union thus had a known father, usually in the home. Homosexuals now often come by getting pregnant while in the homosexual relationship, which is very different. What becomes of children raised by two homosexual women where the father is not known, or at least is not in their life? We don't know. We should find out

It is a fact that Homosexuals tend to have transitory relationships, much more so than Heterosexuals who are in a supposed family relationship with partner adults leading a home with children. Multiple transitions are always going to be bad for kids. The question is can this propensity for transient relationship be impacted positively ( say with gay marriage), or is it part of the inherent nature of homosexually. We don't know. We should find out.

I look at the studies and they seem to be almost all about lesbian homes. Men have the same rights as women, if lesbians can have kids we will have to assume that gay men will want to do it as well. What becomes of kids raised in gay male couple homes? We don't know. We should find out.

What happens in the adult life of kids raised in gay homes? I think there has been ONE study on this, w need to have more. Because in reality given that we have only one study we don't know. We should find out.
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 08:58 pm
Hawkeye - If you plan on citing a letter to the editor about a topic, you should source the original topic.

Don't worry though, I got it for you.

Original Article: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/1/349

Particularly liked this part:
AAP wrote:
In all its work, the AAP is committed to calling attention to the inextricable link between the health and well-being of all children, the support and encouragement of all parents, and the protection of strong family relationships. This analysis was prepared to bring to light the legal, financial, and psychosocial ramifications of recent and proposed public-policy initiatives affecting same-gender parents and their children.

Civil marriage is a legal status that promotes healthy families by conferring a powerful set of rights, benefits, and protections that cannot be obtained by other means. Civil marriage can help foster financial and legal security, psychosocial stability, and an augmented sense of societal acceptance and support. Legal recognition of a spouse can increase the ability of adult couples to provide and care for one another and fosters a nurturing and secure environment for their children. Children who are raised by civilly married parents benefit from the legal status granted to their parents.

Gay and lesbian people have been raising children for many years and will continue to do so in the future; the issue is whether these children will be raised by parents who have the rights, benefits, and protections of civil marriage. Same-gender couples are denied the right to civil marriage in every state except Massachusetts and the right to civil union except in Connecticut and Vermont. The federal government and other state governments do not recognize those civil marriages and civil unions.

There is ample evidence to show that children raised by same-gender parents fare as well as those raised by heterosexual parents. More than 25 years of research have documented that there is no relationship between parents' sexual orientation and any measure of a child's emotional, psychosocial, and behavioral adjustment. These data have demonstrated no risk to children as a result of growing up in a family with 1 or more gay parents. Conscientious and nurturing adults, whether they are men or women, heterosexual or homosexual, can be excellent parents. The rights, benefits, and protections of civil marriage can further strengthen these families.


Your doctor friend's article is fine, but it's not sinking the AAP's ship. What does it take to get some intellectual honesty from you?

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 09:36 pm
@hawkeye10,
What do you expect from any research done at a "St Luke's Children's Hospital?" Show us studies done by unbiased studies with no axe to grind one way or another. You will find that it doesn't matter whether the parent is heterosexual or homosexual. What matters is the love and support they get from their parents.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 09:39 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Here's an article by a newspaper on gay children.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 09:44 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Anderssen, N., Amlie, C., & Ytteroy, E. A. (2002). Outcomes for children with lesbian or gay parents: A review of studies from 1978 to 2000. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 335-351.

Reviewed 23 empirical studies published between 1978 and 2000 on nonclinical children raised by lesbian mothers or gay fathers (one Belgian/Dutch, one Danish, three British, and 18 North American). Twenty studies reported on offspring of lesbian mothers, and three on offspring of gay fathers. The studies encompassed a total of 615 offspring (age range 1.5-44 yrs.) of lesbian mothers or gay fathers and 387 controls, who were assessed by psychological tests, questionnaires, or interviews. Seven types of outcomes were found to be typical: emotional functioning, sexual preference, stigmatization, gender role behavior, behavioral adjustment, gender identity, and cognitive functioning. Children raised by lesbian mothers or gay fathers did not systematically differ from other children on any of the outcomes. The studies indicate that children raised by lesbian women do not experience adverse outcomes compared with other children. The same holds for children raised by gay men, but more studies should be done. (PsycINFO Database Record. Copyright © 2002 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 10:48 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
What do you expect from any research done at a "St Luke's Children's Hospital?" Show us studies done by unbiased studies with no axe to grind one way or another


I can't, sex science has long been corrupted by politics, that is the problem. I am with you, I want solid pure science. The first hurtle is finding funding for it, the second is funded good unbiased researches to to the studies, and the third is finding subjects that are honest and cooperative even if the results are not what they want (homosexuals want, not need, to prove the the majority that their kids are just fine.)
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2008 10:55 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
What do you expect from any research done at a "St Luke's Children's Hospital?" Show us studies done by unbiased studies with no axe to grind one way or another


I can't, sex science has long been corrupted by politics, that is the problem. I am with you, I want solid pure science. The first hurtle is finding funding for it, the second is funded good unbiased researches to to the studies, and the third is finding subjects that are honest and cooperative even if the results are not what they want (homosexuals want, not need, to prove the the majority that their kids are just fine.)


You won't be satisfied unless you are validated. Prove that the AAP has been corrupted by politics if that's your claim, otherwise withdraw your claim.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Prop 8?
  3. » Page 29
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/22/2024 at 11:43:07