3
   

401K question

 
 
Isaac33
 
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 10:13 am
I will be changing jobs soon. My new job does not have a 401K. I need to know what to do with my current 401K. What options do I have? Thanks in advance.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 3 • Views: 2,962 • Replies: 25
No top replies

 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 10:20 am
Roll it over
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 10:22 am
@Isaac33,
You could keep it where it is or roll it into an IRA - contact a financial planner or go an investment office that deals in IRAs. You could do a quick search - many mutual fund companies have retail offices in convienent locations. You could just walk off the street and talk with an investment advisor.

I work in the industry, but am not a finanacial advisor so I can't give you direct financial advice.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 11:28 am
@Linkat,
Depends. I had the option of keeping it where it was, and rolling it over. If I had had less than 5,000 in the fund, I would have been required to either cash out or do an IRA rollover. That was a condition of that particular plan document.

Completing the rollover process ultimately took over a month, with forms to be completed by both the former employer and myself. If you do the rollover now, it may expedite cashing out when you finally do so, at whatever.

Cashing out could also be an option. Withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income, unless you are in a Roth plan. If you anticipate higher income in the future, or higher tax rates at the time of withdrawal, it might be to your advantage to take the money and pay taxes now. If you are not 59 1/2 years old, the penalties on this option would be prohibitive, from a practical standpoint.
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 12:27 pm
Another option is a trustee-to-trustee transfer. This is not considered a roll over. A roll over is when you actually receive the funds. Roll overs have conditions that have to be met. One is a 60 day deadline to roll over the funds from the time you receive the money. Another is a mandatory 20% tax withholding. In order not to be taxed or possibly penalized on the 20%, you must add that amount into the IRA. This is usually a surprise to people come tax time.

gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 01:03 pm
@TTH,
Not to me. I was braced for such an event.
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 01:10 pm
@gustavratzenhofer,
Nice to see you gus Very Happy
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 01:15 pm
And you as well, TTH. Are you still into Republican fellatio, and, if so, may I change my political allegiance for a few minutes?
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 01:35 pm
@gustavratzenhofer,
........as if I didn't know Laughing
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 02:49 pm
@roger,
I would not suggest cashing out - you are penalized as well as taxed. I've never heard of any financial planner or similiar ever suggest taking the cash - it just plain and simple is not a good decision.

If you plan is set up as such that you have to a roll over or cash it out, then go ahead and roll it over. Usually what you need to do is have the check written out to you and the IRA that you are rolling it into. When you go to set up the IRA, the advisor should tell you step by step what you need to do. If you go to an informed and helpful advisor, it should not take months. Mine was completed within a week. (however, it can depend on how long your company takes to write the check to the IRA and you).
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 02:51 pm
@TTH,
With a rollover there is no tax penalty - believe me I work for a company that does this - and I've done it myself. The important thing is to get the clear instruction on how to have the check written so it is done as a rollover rather than a cash out.
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 02:51 pm
@Linkat,
If the person's mind is made up to move the funds into an IRA, then a transfer makes more sense.
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 02:52 pm
@Linkat,
Just make it clear that you want to transfer into an IRA where you will not be charged a penalty or taxed. The advisor should be able to tell precisely how to this and your rollover will not be taxed.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 02:55 pm
@Linkat,
Linkat,
Yes there can be a penalty on a roll over when not completed by the time limit and like I said previously, there is a 20% withholding requirement. So, if the person doesn't contribute 20% into the IRA then it can be taxed and penalized.
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 02:57 pm
@TTH,
Then this is not a rollover - this is a cash withdrawal and then a deposit into an IRA. Semantics I know but if you process a rollover as a rollover then there are no penalties or taxes charged.
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 03:01 pm
@Linkat,
Here is the blurb from my company's website explaining how you have the check addressed to avoid the 20% deduction...
"If a customer elects to have the distribution paid directly to him or her as opposed to XYZ bank as trustee of the IRA, the 20% will be withheld. "
As I was saying above you need to have the check addressed to both to rollover without being charged the deduction, however, as I also stated when you speak with the advisor, s/he will give you details on how to do this and when.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 03:03 pm
@Linkat,
Linkat wrote:

I would not suggest cashing out - you are penalized as well as taxed. I've never heard of any financial planner or similiar ever suggest taking the cash - it just plain and simple is not a good decision.


Quote:
Cashing out could also be an option. Withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income, unless you are in a Roth plan. If you anticipate higher income in the future, or higher tax rates at the time of withdrawal, it might be to your advantage to take the money and pay taxes now. If you are not 59 1/2 years old, the penalties on this option would be prohibitive, from a practical standpoint.


You might note that I took this into consideration. No penalty after age 59 1/2. Honest. Also, if you expect to need the money in the near future, you just might be in a position that your current tax situation might, and I say might , make cashing out not a viable option.
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 03:05 pm
@roger,
Yeah after 59 1/2 you are entitled for retirement and therefore no penalties.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 03:12 pm
@Linkat,
Almost always a bad idea to get stuck with a penalty. Usually a bad idea when you can avoid the penalty. Financial planners with cookie cutter advice are always a bad idea. It was certainly not my option, but maybe for some. . . ?
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Oct, 2008 03:13 pm
@roger,
True - there are always exceptions to the rule...
 

Related Topics

Dollar circulation map - Discussion by gungasnake
Who Deserves to Be on Money, But Isn't - Discussion by Brandon9000
The future of money - Question by Cyracuz
HOW TO GET WEALTHY - Discussion by farmerman
$100 B series 1950 - Question by Carl W Vincent
What is remittance? - Question by MaxAndrew
The War and America's Tax Money - Discussion by edgarblythe
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 401K question
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/24/2024 at 11:08:06