Does race trump gender?

NO!

It seems the left believes that race trumps gender. I have heard people on the left say the phrase, "race trumps gender" with authority as if there is no doubt that the axiom is true.?

Well I am here to provide a dissenting opinion.

I was born a male and identify with others of male population.

I have lived my life to believe that there is no difference between a black man or a white man either intellectually or concerning equality.

But are women as equal to men? NO. It is just a plain fact.

There are vast differences between men and women.

I am bringing up this point because that both Hillary and Sarah Palin represent the vehicle for change not Barack Obama or John McCain.

Barack Obama is just another male dressed in black skin. Men, try to act all civilized and try to fit in but there is that sly subtle part that is always found sitting around the poker table smoking cigars with the boys.

A woman on the other hand if she is black or white is different in very many obvious ways.

They of course have been born with a completely different genitalia...

The brain itself of a woman is made of more compact denser gray matter.

Men are often characterized as cankerous, egotistical, vain, un-humble, too spontaneous, where a woman because of their physical weakness (in most cases) to a man have had to develop and evolve a keener sense of intelligence to combat the often misguided male aggressiveness. Men seek after this kind of female wisdom but do they ever achieve it? Just as women seek after the male orgasm but do they ever achieve it? Or do they surpass the male orgasm? All questions that reveal the differences in the way males and females think and feel.

Also men are driven by images where women are driven by touch. As much as Barack might like to get in touch with his feminine side it will never allow him to bring the type of change a women would bring to either office. I am not saying that women are more ethical. Or am I saying that? Not sure. Only time will tell. Both Cleopatra and Queen Elizabeth were great rulers over long times of peace and renaissance. Margret Thatcher was also a wonderful woman of the people. Joan or Arc was very influential and intellectual woman in a brutal time of such darkness.

Woman “generally” are more nurturing to children. This would make them also predisposed to be possibly more nurturing to people were they to associate people with this inbred instinct of “mothering”…

Men on the other hand seem distant and self absorbed often to the detriment of many households and families.

Minorities seem even more likely to have families without an in-home father.

A woman’s sense of smell is 3 to 4 times greater than that of a man.

A man is often concerned with numbers and exact or specific amounts and women often guestimate and say things like “a whole bunch” or “really terrible.” Men seem to attract to science where women seem to attract to literature. Men are detail oriented, woman have a cleverness that is illusive and sometimes even feared by most men. Woman may be greater problem solvers where men often secretively rely on women for this insight. “Behind every great man is a great woman.”

Even the curvature of the bones within a woman’s body are different than that of a mans.

To say a two men with different colored skin trumps the difference between a man and a women is actually insulting to the men, woman and race.

It detracts from the actual differences between men and woman and “creates a greater gulf” between the commonality and equality of race.

So I am sure the liberals collective chaos have this one wrong and when they beat up on these women in the press and favor a man because he is “black’ they are committing a moral sin against the domains of sexuality.

They are black/white men and even some women, using brute to beat up on women because they dare to challenge race… These women dare to say the differences between race are less than the differences between gender.

Barack Obama may be black but he is JUST ANOTHER MAN and that represents change only to those “racists” who think a black man is different from his white counterpart. To imply that having a black president is more change than having a woman president or VP is overlooking one big thing…

A black/white woman has never been president or vice-president before. Barack dumping Hillary and picking Biden shows that Barack is not a harbinger of "change" he is status quo.

"Men" have been president and I strongly assert that color should be perceived as a "minor" difference compared to gender.

I am not trying to widen and make more of a gap between gender I am just saying that the gap is much larger without any exaggeration than the inequality posed by simply a different skin color. Consider that, gender differences cross the barrier of even race.