Amazing that any one could support applying a law design to punish people who produce pictures of child rape and abuse or those who trade in such pictures with a 17 year old gril sharing a picture of herself with a boyfriend.
What is amazing is that anyone would continue to post from such ignorance, without even a clue what they are talking about. The girl wasn't 17, and didn't just send a picture of herself to her boyfriend. Were that the case; I'd might be inclined to agree with you. It wasn't the case... and your continued perversion of the facts mostly serve to make you look like an idiot.
Anyone who can state that a law design to punish people who are one way or another involve in sexually abusing children down to the age of infants to this young lady is as sick in his or her own way as those who produce or enjoy child porn in my opinion.
The law was altered just a few years ago to specifically address people her age, you moron. Read the thread before further demonstrating your idiocy.
Yes we sure did teach that young lady a lesson on how sick this society can be especially when we can get off harming a defenseless child using the law as the weapon and pounding our chests at how we taught those evil doers a lesson.
Pure idiocy. Teenagers commit crimes and misdemeanors. Adults with the ability to reason like adults recognize this simple truth.
Speeding is dangerous, regardless of the age of the perpetrator. Murder is deadly, regardless of the age of the perpetrator. Creating and distributing child porn to children is harmful, regardless of the age of the perpetrator. If you had your demented way; every boy with a cell-phone camera could send pictures of their manhood to other kids with impunity. Fortunately, District Attorney Oswald doesn’t suffer from your demented brand of idiocy.
Every society draws lines that cannot be crossed without consequences. While the day won’t come that people agree on just where those lines should be drawn; most recognize the need for legal boundaries… and it is nonetheless the duty of District Attorney’s to enforce the lines that are duly drawn by the laws of our land. This particular DA went very far out of his way to curb the offending behavior prior to resorting to traditional law enforcement measures. For this, you classify him with the scumbag creators of child porn? Your opinion says a lot more about you than it does him. Namely, that you are an idiot.
Oh Bill please take note no teenager with a parent was harm just one that is being rasie by the state.
Who is responsible for her guardianship is wholly irrelevant to whether or not her actions constituted a crime. No one with half a brain in their head would want the statutes written any other way. You demonstrate an utter inability to reason with such ridiculous statements. Not sure why I waste my time responding to such inanity.