0
   

So You Wanna Blame Bush for the Mess?

 
 
cjhsa
 
Reply Mon 13 Oct, 2008 07:21 am
From the NY Times archives

September 30, 1999
Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending
By STEVEN A. HOLMES
In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.
The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.
Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.
In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.
''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''
Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.
In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.
''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the Americ an Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''
Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.
Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary mark et. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 967 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Thomas
 
  2  
Reply Mon 13 Oct, 2008 07:41 am
@cjhsa,
That's almost a fair point. "Almost", because the broader financial crisis emerged from a crisis in sub-prime mortages. Sub-prime mortages are mortages to homeowners who can't satisfy Fanny's and Freddie's requirements for down payment.

But I agree with you insofar as both homeownership and easy credit to finance it are bipartisan fetishs. Their worship isn't Bush's mistake alone.
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  0  
Reply Mon 13 Oct, 2008 09:16 am
@cjhsa,
You are wrong again!

http://able2know.org/topic/123861-1
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Oct, 2008 09:20 am
@Thomas,
Quote:
But I agree with you insofar as both homeownership and easy credit to finance it are bipartisan fetishs. Their worship isn't Bush's mistake alone.

I agree. This whole mess has been in the works for decades and each party contributed to it in their own twisted way. Fanny and Freddie were just another error in a long string of errors, the underlying cause being insufficient regulation to prevent private institutions which could not be allowed to fail from developing. This results from a failure of government to properly understand the role of government in global economics.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Oct, 2008 02:01 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Hardly. Your spin won't work this time. And you played the race card. How predictable.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » So You Wanna Blame Bush for the Mess?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 03:18:58