Ghostwriting Letters to the Editor?

Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 07:07 am
Is this a common political practice? Does anyone know?

I ghost-wrote letters to the editor for the McCain campaign

Margriet Oostveen wrote:
I spent a morning in John McCain's Virginia campaign headquarters ghost-writing letters to the editor for McCain supporters to sign. I even pretended to have a son in Iraq.

Editor's note: The following article was originally published on Sept. 13 in Dutch in the newspaper NRC Handelsblad, where Margriet Oostveen writes a weekly column called "Message From Washington." Oostveen has volunteered in various political campaigns and then written about the experience. She has worked for both John McCain and Barack Obama in this election cycle. Click here to see guidelines, talking points and sample letters the McCain campaign gave her.

By Margriet Oostveen

"You can be whoever you want to be," says an inviting Phil Tuchman. "You can be a beggar or a millionaire. A mom or a husband. Whatever. You decide!"

I volunteer in political campaigns now and then. After a series of outings for Obama and a first mission as a phone banker for John McCain, I returned to McCain's headquarters in Arlington, Va. The offer was too alluring to delay -- they wanted to put me into action as a ghostwriter. Next to commercials and phone banking, writing letters to the editor is the most important method of the McCain campaign to attract voters. At least that is what's written in the guidelines that McCain campaign worker Phil Tuchman presents to me.

Today he is training six ghostwriters. What on earth is the appeal of McCain for the former Soviet bloc? Last time I was here, an exuberant Polish guy was phone banking next to me. Today, a Russian in yellow suspenders is shimmering at the same table, looking just like an actor who is famous in the Netherlands for star turns as a genius who suppresses his dark side with painstaking self-control.

The assignment is simple: We are going to write letters to the editor and we are allowed to make up whatever we want -- as long as it adds to the campaign. After today we are supposed to use our free moments at home to create a flow of fictional fan mail for McCain. "Your letters," says Phil Tuchman, "will be sent to our campaign offices in battle states. Ohio. Pennsylvania. Virginia. New Hampshire. There we'll place them in local newspapers."

Place them? I may be wrong, but I thought that in the USA only a newspaper's editors decided that.

"We will show your letters to our supporters in those states," explains Phil. "If they say: 'Yeah, he/she is right!' then we ask them to sign your letter. And then we send that letter to the local newspaper. That's how we send dozens of letters at once."

No newspaper can refuse a stream of articulate expressions of support, is the thought behind it. "This way, we will always get into some letters column."

It is the day after Sarah Palin's speech at the Republican convention. Today, she is our main subject. The others are already enthusiastically hammering their keyboards. I am struggling with a tiny writer's block. "Dear Editor ..."

Phil Tuchman has handed out model letters, and talking points and quotes from Sarah Palin's speech. But whom do I want to be?

Let's loosen up my fingers a little first -- and my principles, too. Am I actually allowed to make up letters? At the moment, it seems to be the only way to demonstrate how this is done in a campaign. So yes. I start practicing attractive sentences about Sarah Palin:

"Her biggest plus to me is that, besides being amazingly smart and qualified, she managed to remain a woman like us. She is the PTA hockey moms. She is the working mothers of special needs children. She is every caring mother of a challenging teenager."

Her pregnant daughter Bristol (17) is not a talking point. A talking point is her son Track (19), who will be deployed to Iraq.

"And most of all, she is just like any mother of a child who deploys to Iraq in the service of this country."

Now we are getting somewhere. I look around. I type:

"My son, too, is there."

Oh god, you liar. Now build up suspense. New paragraph.

"And my heart needs him back safe so much."

Yes, yes. Well done. Another paragraph -- why not? Now let's pump some iron in that mother, for after all, we are not with the Democrats here. Look up the right, patriotic phraseology in the model letters.

"But when I see him again, I also want to see his face glow with pride. Just like the day he told me he enlisted."

Yes, like that. And now full speed in the direction of McCain's plans to continue the war. Sell that war. With a mother's heart.

"That is why Senator John McCain could count on my vote from day one."

But whatever happened to Sarah Palin in this story? I gaze out of the window. This takes 10 minutes. Then:

"With Sarah Palin, I have even more reason to trust in victory. She represents my heart."

Hmm. Does that sound like total doublespeak? Or does it sound like logical reasoning to a McCain supporter? I cannot come up with anything better.

"Sincerely ..." I leave the dots for somebody else's signature.

Does Phil Tuchman want to read it?

Phil bends over my computer screen and reads. This takes a while. I am expecting roars of laughter or to be kicked out. Then he says drily: "I like that. It appeals to the hearts of people. Can you write more letters?"

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 4 • Views: 1,033 • Replies: 11
No top replies

Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 07:18 am

I'm on all kinds of Obama volunteer lists and we're frequently encouraged to write letters to the editor -- but just as ourselves.
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 07:28 am
Since this reporter worked on some Obama staffs, I would love to go back and read her other articles. Unfortunely, I don't speak Dutch.
0 Replies
cicerone imposter
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 11:10 am
Many conservatives still don't see the McCain-Palin lies, because they refuse to acknowledge all the stuff out there in web-land and the media.

Rocket scientists we're not, but what's wrong with their brains?
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 11:20 am
@cicerone imposter,
It still seems to me that making up letters to the editor and giving them to locals to sign is beyond the pale.
cicerone imposter
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 11:46 am
It's obvious that anything goes during this presidential campaign as a precedence for future campaigns. Honesty, ethics, and trust has gone down the drain, and we're to blame for all of it by allowing it to happen.
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 02:13 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

It's obvious that anything goes during this presidential campaign as a precedence for future campaigns. Honesty, ethics, and trust has gone down the drain, and we're to blame for all of it by allowing it to happen.

yup. time to just say no
0 Replies
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 02:50 pm
I think it probably isn't that uncommon. Or at least, people are being fed lines to write in their own letter to the editor. I notice clusters of phrasing pop up very often. Both sides seem guilty to me.

I see a lot of that on A2K lately too. I get the feeling that people are told "start a conversation about X, be sure to point out A, B and C."

Maybe I'm just paranoid, I don't know, but it seems like everyone is Borg and the internet is the mothership.
cicerone imposter
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 03:03 pm
The problem with "probably isn't that common" is that most of us will not know what is written by a ghost writer or a legit letter in the editorials. How will we know?
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 03:40 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I don't think we can know and personally, I'm not that bothered by it because it just doesn't seem that sinister.

We've all probably seen those letters and emails that say "blahblahblah. If you agree, print out this letter, sign it and send it to your Congress person". This doesn't seem that different to me.

My boss used to call me up and say "I need a letter that says blahblahblah." I would write the letter, he would sign it and done deal. I don't see this as that different either.

For all I know, this morning Engineer got an email that said "Your talking point today is this ghost writer thing" and Engineer came on here and started this thread. Again, I don't see a big difference. (I'm not accusing you, Engineer, just using this as an example. No offense intended.)

I agree that it's all kind of tacky but what about this election isn't?
cicerone imposter
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 04:15 pm
All part and parcel of this election; we've been going downhill, and most Americans doesn't seem to care or knows what's happening.
Reply Thu 25 Sep, 2008 09:20 pm
@cicerone imposter,
we've been going
I am still a chain smoker of DUNHILL and i await my downhill
( Sorry that word had distracted my attention and Now I enjoy my DUNHILL.
0 Replies

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
  1. Forums
  2. » Ghostwriting Letters to the Editor?
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/24/2020 at 09:17:17