1
   

Three Easy Pieces for Any Decent American from Michael Moore

 
 
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 04:20 pm
Three Easy Pieces for Any Decent American (from Michael Moore)
September 15, 2003

There are many otherwise decent Americans who are either still on the fence about George W. Bush or they actually profess to like the man. They are the ones who make up the 58% approval ratings and the 64% who say they still believe the war was a good idea. You know these people well. They work next to you, or they sit in the classroom next to you, or they may even be sitting at your kitchen table right now!

I think that we need to hold out a hand to them, not in a partisan sort of way, and not with any condescension. I think that if we share with them a few pieces of information, and do it with common sense instead of politics, there is a chance we just might break through and turn things around. Perhaps it's my foolish optimism in the goodness that is in every person, and in their ability to ultimately know right from wrong.

I would like to give you three little vignettes to share with them. They are so simple and so shocking in their very content that, if you pass them around the office, the school, the neighborhood or the bedroom, it may just do the trick. Here they are:

1. GEORGE AND LAURA ON 9/11 -- A BARREL OF LAUGHS!

The following is an interview with the First Couple from the current issue of one of my favorite magazines, Ladies Home Journal (Oct. '03). They are asked about what September 11, 2001, was like for them personally, and, although over 3,000 people had just perished, George W. was able to find some humor by the end of that day:

Peggy Noonan (the interviewer): You were separated on September 11th. What was it like when you saw each other again?

Laura Bush: Well, we just hugged. I think there was a certain amount of security in being with each other than being apart.

George W. Bush: But the day ended on a relatively humorous note. The agents said, "you'll be sleeping downstairs. Washington's still a dangerous place." And I said no, I can't sleep down there, the bed didn't look comfortable. I was really tired, Laura was tired, we like our own bed. We like our own routine. You know, kind of a nester. I knew I had to deal with the issue the next day and provide strength and comfort to the country, and so I needed rest in order to be mentally prepared. So I told the agent we're going upstairs, and he reluctantly said okay. Laura wears contacts, and she was sound asleep. Barney was there. And the agent comes running up and says, "We're under attack. We need you downstairs," and so there we go. I'm in my running shorts and my T-shirt, and I'm barefooted. Got the dog in one hand, Laura had a cat, I'm holding Laura --

Laura Bush: I don't have my contacts in , and I'm in my fuzzy house slippers --

George W. Bush: And this guy's out of breath, and we're heading straight down to the basement because there's an incoming unidentified airplane, which is coming toward the White House. Then the guy says it's a friendly airplane. And we hustle all the way back up stairs and go to bed.

Mrs. Bush: [LAUGHS] And we just lay there thinking about the way we must have looked.

Peggy Noonan (interviewer): So the day starts in tragedy and ends in Marx Brothers.

George W. Bush: THAT'S RIGHT-- WE GOT A LAUGH OUT OF IT!

(end)

Although America had just suffered the worst attack ever on our own soil, somehow this man was able to end his day on a funny note. I wonder how many of the 3,000 families who lost someone earlier that day had a funny ending before they went to sleep? Please read the above exchange aloud to anyone who will listen. It speaks volumes.

2. WE HAVE JUST WRECKED OUR KIDS' FUTURE.

The first paragraph in yesterday's New York Times story on how Bush has taken a record surplus and demolished it into a record deficit was one of the best lead paragraphs I have ever read in a newspaper article.

Here's how it went:

"When President Bush informed the nation last Sunday night that remaining in Iraq next year will cost another $87 billion, many of those who will actually pay that bill were unable to watch. They had already been put to bed by their parents."

Bingo. Gee, I hope the kids thank us some day!

Here's the next paragraph (my emphasis added):

"Administration officials acknowledged the next day that every dollar of that cost will be BORROWED, a loan that economists say will be repaid by the NEXT generation of taxpayers AND THE GENERATION AFTER THAT. The $166 BILLION cost of the work SO FAR in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has stunned many in Washington, will be added to what was already the largest budget deficit the nation has ever known."

Every conservative friend of yours should weep when they read that, and then you should hug them and tell them that it'll be okay, once we all do what we need to do.

3. WHAT WOULD $87 BILLION BUY?

If you can't get through this list without wanting to throw up, I'll understand. But pass it around anyway. This is the nail in the Iraq War's coffin for any sane, thinking individual, regardless of their political stripe (thanks to TomPaine.com and the Center for American Progress)...

To get some perspective, here are some real-life comparisons about what $87 billion means:

$87 Billion Is More Than The Combined Total Of All State Budget Deficits In The United States.

The Bush administration proposed absolutely zero funds to help states deal with these deficits, despite the fact that their tax cuts drove down state revenues. [Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities]

$87 Billion Is Enough To Pay The 3.3 Million People Who Have Lost Jobs Under George W. Bush $26,363 Each!

The unemployment benefits extension passed by Congress at the beginning of this year provides zero benefits to "workers who exhausted their regular, state unemployment benefits and cannot find work." All told, two-thirds of unemployed workers have exhausted their benefits. [Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities]

$87 Billion Is More Than DOUBLE The Total Amount The Government Spends On Homeland Security.

The U.S. spends about $36 billion on homeland security. Yet, Sen. Warren Rudman (R-N.H.) wrote "America will fall approximately $98.4 billion short of meeting critical emergency responder needs" for homeland security without a funding increase. [Source: Council on Foreign Relations]

$87 Billion Is 87 Times The Amount The Federal Government Spends On After School Programs.

George W. Bush proposed a budget that reduces the $1 billion for after-school programs to $600 million -- cutting off about 475,000 children from the program. [Source: The Republican-dominated House Appropriations Committee]

$87 Billion Is More Than 10 Times What The Government Spends On All Environmental Protection.

The Bush administration requested just $7.6 billion for the entire Environmental Protection Agency. This included a 32 percent cut to water quality grants, a 6 percent reduction in enforcement staff, and a 50 percent cut to land acquisition and conservation. [Source: Natural Resources Defense Council]

There you go. In black and white. A few million of you will receive this letter. Please share the above with at least a half-dozen people today and tomorrow. I, like you, do not want to see another approval rating over 50%.

Yours,
Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com
[email protected]

PS. Thanks for the astounding response to the Wesley Clark letter (and for your kind comments to me). Over 95% of the thousands of letters received favored the General tossing his helmet in the ring. All were passed on to his organization. More to come on the road to removing Bush...
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 895 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
fealola
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 04:30 pm
The first one's really hard to believe. I'd like to see the article. Rolling Eyes Shocked
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 08:40 pm
My refute to Mr. Moore.

1. A lot of bunk as usual from Mr. Moore. First of all that day was so surreal everybody was going through about a million emotions, I'm sure a lot of people had a laugh on that day about something. There's no need to spin this into Bush thought 9/11 was a laughing matter, that's an utterly irresponsible and rediculous take on the interview. It just shows they are human like everyone else, including Moore, who allowed the word 'hillarious' to be put on the video sleeve of his fake documentary, Bowling For Columbine. The Columbine tragedy was a laughing matter also, huh? And he had much more time to reflect on it than the Bush's did on the events of the morning of 9/11 at the end of that day.

2. It isn't a record deficit, yet Rolling Eyes , it's a record figure, do the math Moore. Rolling Eyes

The latest estimate is that it could be just under $500 billion dollars.

Give me an honest answer here. Considering your own household budget, which would you rather have: A deficit equal to 5% of your annual budget, or one equal to 3% of that budget?

Now, another question. Which deficit would you rather have: A $3000 annual deficit or one equal to $5000? You're going to take the $3000 deficit, right? So far, so good.

Now ... the third question. Just a little more complicated. Which would you rather have: A $3,000 deficit with an annual operating budget of $10,000; or a $5,000 deficit with an annual operating budget of $50,000. Whoops! Now you're going to take the larger dollar amount, right? If you chose the smaller deficit amount they there is a strong probability that Moore was educated in government schools. The $3,000 deficit in our example represents a 30% budget deficit, while the $5,000 deficit equals a 10% deficit. It would be a lot easier to increase your productivity by 10% to cover that $5,000 deficit than it would be to boost your personal economy by 30% to take care of that smaller $3,000 total.

Now, what did we learn here. We earned that the important figure regarding budget relates to it's percentage of the total budget rather than its dollar amount.

3. The jury is still out on the 87bil. because we don't know the end result of it yet or if that will be all. It's more than I can comprehend and whether we want to spend it or not, we're pretty much in a got to, pinch. I'll try to untwist a little of Moore's diatribe anyway. I don't think he, along with any poltician should be able to blather on unchecked when so many will swallow it without a second thought.

The Budget Deficit of California is more than the reast of the other 49 states combined, where's Moore on that?

If the U.S. gov't keeps bailing out the states, they will never straighten out their own budget problems, Washington has enough problem with Washington's budget.

Lost jobs, bad situation, Moore wants to lay it all on Bush, many of them on Bush's watch of course but many a fallout from the false economy of the previous administration. Not to mention the economy stunting 9/11 incident could have been deterred by the previous.

My dad is one of the people who ran all the way through their extended unemployment benefits. Still no steady job, my two sister's and I help my parents make ends meet along with dad picking up odd jobs. I know not everyone has someone to fall back on, wish it wasn't so. Also the average debt of American's with credit cards etc. compounds the problem, and even if we had the budget we can't pay out indefinitely.

Maybe it would be good for us to have less EPA enabled by a larger budget. Maybe some laxing in regulations would spur some power companies to build some new power generation plants to remedy the overtaxed grid that we have, without EPA regs causing cost overkill. They do have their place, but like most gov't programs, it has run amuck. The EPA needs money for land acquisition and conservation? What's that about?

And there you go, Moore, in black in white my refute to your intelligence insulting diatribe, sadly mine won't go out to millions on your e-mail chain because you will see to it.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 09:24 pm
Hey, look at the bright side. With the way the Bushies run the economy, all those unsightly poor people will starve and die. The ones that are left can be servants for the upper classes. Isn't that what America is all about? Mad
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 09:49 pm
hobitbob wrote:
Hey, look at the bright side. With the way the Bushies run the economy, all those unsightly poor people will starve and die. The ones that are left can be servants for the upper classes. Isn't that what America is all about? :X


Your post is a perfect example of you looking on the bright side, this is as close to the bright side of an opinon that you get. Hurry up and graduate so you can leave this this evil country that's on a slippery slope to hell so you won't have to slide down with it. If you lost your job and were starving and dying, your outlook wouldn't be any different, you go way beyond the call of criticism.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 09:52 pm
Sooo good to hear from such a patriotic American. Wink
0 Replies
 
EpsilonMinus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Sep, 2003 10:31 pm
Well, as much as I dislike President Bush, I find Michael Moore to be a well-intentioned bumbling fool.

That article really was disappointing, as usual from Moore:

1) A man who makes his living making fun of serious social issues is reproaching another man for laughing on September 11th? Ridiculous - it almost made me stop reading the article. Every decent debater knows to include the weakest point in the middle. Better yet, find something decent to criticize Bush on, like the ICC.

2) Even though Bush adding to a debt that he should be rapidly paying off, he's only increasing the debt-to-GDP ratio marginally, so to say "we have just wrecked our kids' future" is absurd. Then again, I wouldn't expect facts to get in Moore's way.

3) These are pretty weak comparisons, and much better ones could be made. I'm Canadian, but isn't education a state concern? And generally in federations, the federal government spends more than lower governments, so his first point is far from surprising or shocking - what did I say about putting your weak points in the middle?


In short, pretty unconvincing stuff if you don't already agree with him.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Sep, 2003 10:34 pm
I find Moore to be more or less a buffoon. He is entertaining for the outrage he provokes from the far right. I personally don't see him a a valid source any more than Al Franken or Bill Maher.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Sep, 2003 07:24 am
True dat. You'll also notice he would have spent the 87 anyway, just on other things, either way somebody is going to be paying it off. Is Clark sure he wants this guy as his campaign manager?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Three Easy Pieces for Any Decent American from Michael Moore
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 12:27:08