child donors

I hate the new forum. I think I shall take my act on the road shortly.

Anyway, this guy in Denver is doing child-to-child-organ-transplants in some unorthodox manner, raising various ethical issues about how long the donor kid should be dead, pre-necrotic conditions, blah, blah blah.

I'd like to preface by saying I'm pro stems-cell, to the extent of thinking women should be able to sell their fetii for cash. And I'm pro abortion, in countries where ambient fascism levels allow, I think first-conceptions before age 28 should undergo compulsory-termination.

However, once birth occurs, and the neonate draws or is mechanically compelled to draw breath and does so, I don't see how they could consider him/her to be a candidate for organ-donation prior to the established age-of-consent. I mean, if junior can't work in pornos no matter what mom & pop say, why should he/she be able to be chopped up for parts? The body could instead be chryonically preserved for future reanimation - impractical and speculative though the option is, it exists therefor the decision exists - if circumstance is not to be allowed to decide the child's fate, why should sentiment?