ebrown_p wrote:Been there, done that, voted for Nader in 2000.
Funny thing, in spite of my cynicism, it DID matter who won that election. Furthermore, in hindsight, it seem that Gore would have made a decent president.
(On the other hand, maybe Roe v. Wade isn't that important after all.)
the Clinton/Gore strategy for responding to terrorists attacks on America was to .........................
..........oh yeah , go bomb an empty factory at night
the Clinton/Gore strategy for the economy was to sue Microsoft and take the tech-heavy NASDAQ from 5000 to 2500 in just one year
the Clinton/Gore strategy for dealing with firearms violations was to burn 100 people alive while trying to arrest one suspect
the Clinton/Gore strategy for health care was to impose criminal penalties on those wishing to pay for health care out of their own pocket (they went outside the system, ooooooooooooooooooooo)
the Clinton/Gore idea for campaign finance integrity was to claim there was 'no controlling legal authority' (i.e. 'we can do what we **** well please')
the Clinton/Gore strategy for balancing the budget and reforming welfare was to be glad that your buds in the Democratic congress ignored these things in '93 and '94 , and then only sign on and take credit when FORCED to by a Republican congress
yeah, I'm sure Gore woulda made a great Prez
for either of them. To me, it is just a matter of who will screw up the least.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace