DrewDad wrote:Your fascination with images of Hitler is very telling.
So, you think I'm a closet democrat now
The Weimar Republic had very restrictive gun laws, partially based on the experiences of the post WWI-period. The Nazis lifted many of those restrictions with the Reichswaffengesetz of 1938. Even the introduction of special laws pertaining to Jewish citizens did not affect the gun laws for the general population.
Compulsive gun nuts were probably quite happy with the Nazi regime.
Hitler disarmed the populace before he moved against them.
Anti-Gun nuts LOVE Hitler.
H2O_MAN wrote:Hitler disarmed the populace before he moved against them.
Your cluelessness is rather amusing. In a sad way.
old europe wrote:H2O_MAN wrote:Hitler disarmed the populace before he moved against them.
Your cluelessness is rather amusing. In a sad way.
And the other sentence is even perverse³
H2O_MAN wrote:Anti-Gun nuts LOVE Hitler.
DrewDad wrote:mysteryman wrote: You have seriously lost your mind.
You're being generous in assuming he had a mind in the first place.
Standard tactic by the loony bin left - attack the poster.
MM, I think you're moving into Obama's camp. You and dd might make a nice couple.
cjhsa wrote: Standard tactic by the loony bin left - attack the poster.
You're the one that's set yourself up as a target for ridicule. Shirley, you can't expect me not to take the occasional potshot.
I set myself up as a target for ridicule from the clueless, such as yourself, by posting about isues that SHOULD be important to Americans, but are not here on A2K, because, well, because you're not a representative sample.
If you're looking for a representative sample of Americans, then Internet boards ain't the place to go. Habitués of any Internet board are going to be self-selected.
If your goal is to inform folks, then you're going about it the wrong way, IMO. Spamming the boards with paranoid fantasies and then insulting folks who disagree with you ain't gonna inform anyone. You've become a rude version of the boy who called wolf.
If, however, your goal is to look like a complete fool, then by all means continue your current approach.
DrewDad wrote:...the boy who called wolf.
In a room full of sheeple!
Beware of wanting to lead the flock:
Noun
1. bellwether - someone who assumes leadership of a movement or activity
leader - a person who rules or guides or inspires others
2. bellwether - sheep that leads the herd often wearing a bell
wether - male sheep especially a castrated one
This makes the fear of having your gun taken away a bit easier to understand.
I guess if you look at it that way....
I need to go buy more guns. You aren't getting my nads ya sociopaths!
I'd suggest that you need to be more concerned about your marbles.
Only the brain dead choose to be helpless.
Count yourself among them.
"Not choosing to have a gun in the house and therefore endanger my family" <> "helpless"
I'm not sure this concept will fit into the shrivelled pea you use for cogitation, though.
It doesn't fit and not for the reason you suggest. You are an idiot.
You might as well put a big I on your forehead - the chimps like to shoot that pattern.
Trust your local cops to protect you. Please.
You might want to know it's not really their job.
