Yes, it is wrong to view child pornography.

You are without question the single most despicable piece of worthless f@cking scum that has never been arrested. I don't care if I get banned. A2K has lost the plot if it's going to allow evil slime sucking filth like you to continue to spread your disease on it's pages. Nobody believes this is a mere psychological exercise on your part. We can only hope that you caught, arrested, imprisoned, and spend as many years as possible getting your arse reamed in prison before dying a long painful death. Such an outcome would still be too good for you.

You are without question the single most despicable piece of worthless f@cking scum that has never been arrested. I don't care if I get banned. A2K has lost the plot if it's going to allow evil slime sucking filth like you to continue to spread your disease on it's pages. Nobody believes this is a mere psychological exercise on your part. We can only hope that you caught, arrested, imprisoned, and spend as many years as possible getting your arse reamed in prison before dying a long painful death. Such an outcome would still be too good for you.

If you can't make a better argument then your position should lose, .

You are without question the single most despicable piece of worthless f@cking scum that has never been arrested. I don't care if I get banned. A2K has lost the plot if it's going to allow evil slime sucking filth like you to continue to spread your disease on it's pages. Nobody believes this is a mere psychological exercise on your part. We can only hope that you caught, arrested, imprisoned, and spend as many years as possible getting your arse reamed in prison before dying a long painful death. Such an outcome would still be too good for you.

hawkeye10 wrote:

If you can't make a better argument then your position should lose, .

Yet, your position has already lost.

Keep this up, and I'm likely to just reply "loooooooser!" to everything you post.

Actually, I'll just start now.

Looooooooser! You lost the argument already. Your a losing loser. You are a pile of fail. We are a ginormous can of win, and we opened it all over your losing ass.

hawkeye10 wrote:

If you can't make a better argument then your position should lose, .

Yet, your position has already lost.

Keep this up, and I'm likely to just reply "loooooooser!" to everything you post.

Actually, I'll just start now.

Looooooooser! You lost the argument already. Your a losing loser. You are a pile of fail. We are a ginormous can of win, and we opened it all over your losing ass.

You're both looooooosers. Your positions are morally bankrupt, and when you promote them, you fail. Massive fail. Brittany Spears laughs at how much you fail. The first person voted off the first episode of the first season of Survivor laughs at how much you fail. The only way you could fail more is to say that you think people should be allowed to have sex with aborted fetuses. Which probably gives you an erection.

dlowan:

Quote:

it was evident pretty much immediately that no rational argument would have any effect, and I think they get off on the debate.

ditto. nuff said.

snood wrote:

dlowan:

Quote:

it was evident pretty much immediately that no rational argument would have any effect, and I think they get off on the debate.

ditto. nuff said.

Does anyone here think that agrote doesn't get off on the crap-storm he started? Many responsible adults driven to distraction over the outrageous claims over kiddie porn have posted here and all we have done is to fan the flames of his perversion. In the other thread started by agrote, he take offense that I had the nerve to call him sick (or whatever word I chose) and all I can say is it makes me feel slimy to even read the ridiculous rationalization that he has proposed, and I don't think any of us are taken in by his late conclusion that maybe child porn is bad but the punishment is too severe. People like this are not worth the internet ink it takes to respond. I agree with Snood, dlwon, ossobucco and the others who pinpointed the true nature of his postings. Agrote should take his morals and get them dry cleaned.

In the other thread started by agrote, he take offense that I had the nerve to call him sick (or whatever word I chose) and all I can say is it makes me feel slimy to even read the ridiculous rationalization that he has proposed, and I don't think any of us are taken in by his late conclusion that maybe child porn is bad but the punishment is too severe.

Can you remember what my position is?

everybody contributes to a thread for their own reasons, as it should be.

Why am I "sick", exactly?

hawkeye10 wrote:

everybody contributes to a thread for their own reasons, as it should be.

You do it because you're a loser and a large steaming pile of fail.

agrote wrote:

Why am I "sick", exactly?

Because you keep coming back for your daily dose of abuse? Loser.

I gotta hand it to you, you've got acting like a seven year old down.

hawkeye10 wrote:

I gotta hand it to you, you've got acting like a seven year old down.

I'm certain that you are an expert at interacting with seven-year-olds.

Also, you fail at hyphenating.

DrewDad wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

I gotta hand it to you, you've got acting like a seven year old down.

I'm certain that you are an expert at interacting with seven-year-olds.

Also, you fail at hyphenating.

I'm sure his forte is gazing at pictures of 7-year-olds, he would be in big trouble in my neck of the woods.