1
   

Dollar drops 41% during Bush term

 
 
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 10:18 am
Bush's Dollar Drop Maps Loss of U.S. Clout at Final G-8 Summit

By James G. Neuger

July 3 (Bloomberg) -- When President George W. Bush went to his first Group of Eight summit in 2001, a dominant issue was the dollar -- the strong dollar, that is. The U.S. currency was on a record-setting streak, and the free-marketeering president wasn't going to stand in the way.

On the eve of Bush's last G-8 appearance, the dollar's gyrations are again in the crossfire. This time, it is a weak currency, upended by slumping growth, a housing recession and record gas prices, that is gnawing away at the world economy.

The dollar's 41 percent drop against the euro during Bush's term writes the economic epitaph of an administration that set out to restore American preeminence. Instead, Bush heads to Japan next week for his final international summit with diminished leverage as Russian and Chinese influence grows.

``Between the economic duress facing the United States and the global community at large and the fact that the clock is running out on the Bush administration, Bush does not hold a good hand,'' said Charles Kupchan, an international-relations professor at Georgetown University in Washington. He called the summit a ``damage-limitation'' exercise to show the world that governments are trying to contain food and oil prices.

Global economic-confidence building crowds the agenda at the three-day summit starting July 7 in Toyako, on the northern Japanese island of Hokkaido, that was meant to tackle climate change, recommit the rich world to development aid for Africa and strengthen nuclear non-proliferation controls.

Growth Lags

Bush represents the worst-performing economy in the G-8 after Italy, with growth of 0.5 percent this year set to lag behind 1.6 percent in the U.K., 1.4 percent in the euro area, 1.4 percent in Japan and 1.3 percent in Canada, according to International Monetary Fund forecasts.

Russia, brought into the G-8 by Bill Clinton in 1998, will eclipse the rest of the club with growth of 6.8 percent this year, the IMF says. Russia's oil and commodity wealth puts it at odds with the western goal of cutting reliance on fossil fuels. China, seen expanding 9.3 percent, has also frustrated the fight against global warming by locking up energy deals in Africa to slake its economic thirst. China will be among eight non-G-8 members that take part on the summit's last day.

America's economic woes with $4-a-gallon gasoline prices will stiffen Bush's opposition to European and Japanese calls for binding, quantifiable targets for cutting greenhouse-gas emissions, blamed by scientists for pushing up global temperatures.

Global Warming

Bush took a baby step at last year's G-8 by acknowledging the need to do something about global warming, edging the U.S. away from the laissez-faire approach that he championed after pulling the U.S. out of the Kyoto climate-protection protocol in a move that met international condemnation in 2001.

With the countdown under way to the presidency of Barack Obama or John McCain, the most the summit can do is set up a framework for pollution-cutting agreements that replace Kyoto when it expires in 2012, said Reginald Dale, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

``Most of Bush's partners are looking to the next president,'' Dale said. European leaders will ``be trying to pin Bush further down on the nature of commitments that the United States might undertake to reduce emissions in the shorter term.''

Europe's Bind

Europe is caught in a bind of its own. Soaring fuel prices and a chorus of protests put pressure on leaders to offer relief instead of weaning consumers away from fossil fuels. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, holder of the 27-nation European Union's six-month presidency, is pressing for fuel-tax cuts.

Oil prices continued climbing after pressure by European leaders including Britain's Gordon Brown led Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, to announce for July the third straight monthly increase in production.

``There's no hope for new achievements or concrete results regarding crude-oil prices or the shortage of food or global warming,'' said Koichi Kato, a senior member of Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party.

Spiraling food and fuel costs are hitting poorer countries the hardest, increasing the pressure on the G-8 to make good on a 2005 pledge to double development aid to Africa to $50 billion annually by 2010 and to implement last year's promise to invest $60 billion worldwide to combat deadly diseases.

Price Surge

G-8 finance ministers last month identified surging commodities prices as a bigger threat than the credit squeeze to the world economy. Prices for 19 commodities in the Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index rose 29 percent in the first half, the most since 1973. Rice, corn and wheat futures have all touched records this year.

Sagging faith in the dollar -- it now makes up 63 percent of global currency reserves, down from 71 percent when Bush took office -- complicates efforts to tame commodity prices because they are primarily denominated in the U.S. currency.

America's dependence on imported capital to finance a $9.5 trillion debt -- up from $5.7 trillion when Bush took office -- has driven down the currency. The decline was accelerated by the subprime crisis that plunged the U.S. into an economic tailspin.

``If Bush could get others at the G-8 summit to demand a stronger dollar he'd have done a final good after a lot of negatives over the years,'' said Uwe von Parpart, chief Asia strategist at Cantor Fitzgerald LP in Hong Kong. ``Dollar strengthening appears to be the only thing capable of containing or pushing back oil prices.''

Speaking at the White House yesterday, Bush tried to give the markets a nudge: ``We're strong dollar people in this administration and have always been for the strong dollar.''
link
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,648 • Replies: 29
No top replies

 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 10:31 am
The price of oil is up about 50% - since the start of this year.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 10:56 am
remember 26 july 2006 :

BOONE PICKENS PREDICTS OIL PRICE OF$80/BARREL

he was considered bonkers and some suggested that he be carried off to the loonie-bin .
how quickly things change Shocked
hbg
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 11:05 am
These are the things that happen when you get a Democratic Congress. It really shouldn't be a shock.

Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:

1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $4.00 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.

America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!

Remember it's Congress that makes law not the President. He has to work with what's handed to him.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 11:07 am
That, or veto what is handed to him. Bush has done this with frequency.

What a bunch of Bullshit you peddle, McG. The policies enacted by the Republican party (weak dollar policy, Aggressive wars, lack of regulation) have directly led to our current financial problems; and you have the nerve to blame the Dems?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 11:08 am
You state the obvious facts.

The Congress had a big hand in creating the mess.

What ideas are both parties putting forth to correct this problem is what we should be debating.

You whine bags are getting on our nerves . Evil or Very Mad
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 11:16 am
McGentrix wrote:
These are the things that happen when you get a Democratic Congress. It really shouldn't be a shock.

Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:

1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $4.00 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.

America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!

Remember it's Congress that makes law not the President. He has to work with what's handed to him.


The home loans that were made in 2006 were not a result of the Democratic Congress. The drop in home equity is a result of bad loans made without regulation. Most of those loans were made before the dems took control. The increase in foreclosures is NOT for homes purchased in 2007 and 2008.

The market losses are in large part a result of the home mortgage crises which can not be laid at the feet of anything done by the democratic congress. If anything it is a result of the lack of regulation under the GOP congress and the Bush HUD.

For anyone that thinks otherwise. The Democratic congress took office in Jan of 2007. The 2007 budget was already passed and in place by the previous congress. The 2007 congress passes the 2008 budget goes into effect Oct of 2007. That effectively means the government was still being run by the GOP until Oct of 2007.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 11:19 am
Don't confuse McGentrix with the facts.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 11:28 am
Regulation is necessary. It helps prevent abuse.

Sure most people won't abuse the system but then most people won't commit murder either. Without regulation we always end up with a mess.

The Savings and Loans
The hedge fund mess
The present home mortgage mess.

Some day maybe we'll learn that giving businesses everything they want is not the way to run a country.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 11:51 am
Don't forget the robber barons.

Human nature can be ugly.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 11:58 am
We can thank the Democratic Congress for the troubles we face today and in the near future.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 12:39 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That, or veto what is handed to him. Bush has done this with frequency.

What a bunch of Bullshit you peddle, McG. The policies enacted by the Republican party (weak dollar policy, Aggressive wars, lack of regulation) have directly led to our current financial problems; and you have the nerve to blame the Dems?

Cycloptichorn


You are naive to think it is only one party to blame. You have an annoying tendency to think everybody but you and your democratic supporters are the only "smart" people around.

Which party was in control for 30 years and did NOTHING to reduce the US dependency on foreign oil?

Which party was in control that provided N. Korea assistance in building Nukes?

Which party was in control who sold out American interests to Middle East and other foreign govts.

BOTH PARTIES had their hands in this mess.

Yet you a-holes in La-La land keep electing Democrats over and over again. A-Hole in NY and Mass. keep electing the same democratic a-hols in Govt. On and On.

You and all the other partisen sheep keep electing the same a$$holes to Congress then you complain.

YOU are the problem and YOU get the Government YOU deserve.

Keep whining and keep voting the same a$$holes and next year you can complain about the same BS no matter who wins in November.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 12:42 pm
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That, or veto what is handed to him. Bush has done this with frequency.

What a bunch of Bullshit you peddle, McG. The policies enacted by the Republican party (weak dollar policy, Aggressive wars, lack of regulation) have directly led to our current financial problems; and you have the nerve to blame the Dems?

Cycloptichorn


You are naive to think it is only one party to blame. You have an annoying tendency to think everybody but you and your democratic supporters are the only "smart" people around.

Which party was in control for 30 years and did NOTHING to reduce the US dependency on foreign oil?

Which party was in control that provided N. Korea assistance in building Nukes?

Which party was in control who sold out American interests to Middle East and other foreign govts.

BOTH PARTIES had their hands in this mess.

Yet you a-holes in La-La land keep electing Democrats over and over again. A-Hole in NY and Mass. keep electing the same democratic a-hols in Govt. On and On.

You and all the other partisen sheep keep electing the same a$$holes to Congress then you complain.

YOU are the problem and YOU get the Government YOU deserve.

Keep whining and keep voting the same a$$holes and next year you can complain about the same BS no matter who wins in November.


I wonder, if upon re-reading your post, you have a different opinion of how your comments come off, then you may originally have had while writing them.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 12:54 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That, or veto what is handed to him. Bush has done this with frequency.

What a bunch of Bullshit you peddle, McG. The policies enacted by the Republican party (weak dollar policy, Aggressive wars, lack of regulation) have directly led to our current financial problems; and you have the nerve to blame the Dems?

Cycloptichorn


You are naive to think it is only one party to blame. You have an annoying tendency to think everybody but you and your democratic supporters are the only "smart" people around.

Which party was in control for 30 years and did NOTHING to reduce the US dependency on foreign oil?

Which party was in control that provided N. Korea assistance in building Nukes?

Which party was in control who sold out American interests to Middle East and other foreign govts.

BOTH PARTIES had their hands in this mess.

Yet you a-holes in La-La land keep electing Democrats over and over again. A-Hole in NY and Mass. keep electing the same democratic a-hols in Govt. On and On.

You and all the other partisen sheep keep electing the same a$$holes to Congress then you complain.

YOU are the problem and YOU get the Government YOU deserve.

Keep whining and keep voting the same a$$holes and next year you can complain about the same BS no matter who wins in November.


I wonder, if upon re-reading your post, you have a different opinion of how your comments come off, then you may originally have had while writing them.

Cycloptichorn


I do not care what you think. You and people/sheep like you are the problem with America.

When will you realize these politicians could not care less about you and every other "little person" in this country. Keep voting for the same a$$holes and you will be bitching about the same thing next year.

Presidents do not matter much anyway. All politics is LOCAL and if you do not start turning over your local Reps, the same sh!t will go on and you can continue to spew about how GREAT the Democrats are.

Your boring! Evil or Very Mad
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 01:44 pm
woiyo wrote:
Your boring! Evil or Very Mad

Yes, you're our boring, and we love you.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 02:09 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
We can thank the Democratic Congress for the troubles we face today and in the near future.

So, you don't understand much about how the government works, do you?

As already shown, the Democratic congress that took power in 2007 can NOT be blamed for the present mortgage crisis or its fallout since the crisis is based in actions that occurred before they took office, let alone passed any legislation.

This isn't about partisanship H2O. It's called reality. Can both parties be blamed for the crisis? Reasonably, yes.

Can the Democrats that took over in 2007 be entirely responsible? No way in hell or in the real world. Only in bizarro RW world can you blame the Dems alone.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 02:12 pm
woiyo wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
That, or veto what is handed to him. Bush has done this with frequency.

What a bunch of Bullshit you peddle, McG. The policies enacted by the Republican party (weak dollar policy, Aggressive wars, lack of regulation) have directly led to our current financial problems; and you have the nerve to blame the Dems?

Cycloptichorn


You are naive to think it is only one party to blame. You have an annoying tendency to think everybody but you and your democratic supporters are the only "smart" people around.

Which party was in control for 30 years and did NOTHING to reduce the US dependency on foreign oil?
That must be the Republicans because I remember Carter pushing legislation and conservation as a way to reduce foreign oil dependency.
Quote:

Which party was in control that provided N. Korea assistance in building Nukes?
Who provided N Korea in assistance with Nukes? I can find no evidence of any party doing that? Is this some bizarro RW conspiracy theory?
Quote:

Which party was in control who sold out American interests to Middle East and other foreign govts.
That would be both of them, I guess.

Quote:

BOTH PARTIES had their hands in this mess.
Yes, both take some blame.
Quote:

Yet you a-holes in La-La land keep electing Democrats over and over again. A-Hole in NY and Mass. keep electing the same democratic a-hols in Govt. On and On.

You and all the other partisen sheep keep electing the same a$$holes to Congress then you complain.

YOU are the problem and YOU get the Government YOU deserve.

Keep whining and keep voting the same a$$holes and next year you can complain about the same BS no matter who wins in November.
Funny how both parties are to blame but you only talk about the Democrats being elected woiyo? Did you forget your earlier statement all of a sudden?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 02:18 pm
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2008/07/phil-gramm-320x240.jpg Foreclosure Phil

NEWS: Years before Phil Gramm was a McCain campaign adviser and a lobbyist for a Swiss bank at the center of the housing credit crisis, he pulled a sly maneuver in the Senate that helped create today's subprime meltdown.

By David Corn

May 28, 2008
link
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 06:45 pm
I thought the foreclosure situation was caused by the mortgages becoming part of the global economy's investments, and therefore a mortgage was not kept as the debt of the bank giving the mortgage. So, mortgages were given out with less concern, so that the bank could generate income. Who came up with this concept of packaging mortgages for worldwide investors?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 06:57 pm
Core message:

woiyo wrote:
BOTH PARTIES had their hands in this mess.

Yet you a-holes in La-La land keep electing Democrats over and over again.



Both parties are guilty. Therefore vote Republican.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Dollar drops 41% during Bush term
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/16/2024 at 02:49:19