agrote wrote:That's fine. The point is, I'm 21. Regardless of how clever I may or may not be.
No, the point i made is that you don't have any reason to claim that you write well. You don't.
Quote:Quote:Quote:I'm about to start a PhD in Philosophy; that's why my arguments are carefully honed.
Not only do i not see any evidence of that, i see a good deal of evidence to the contrary.
You see evidence to the contrary that I have a place on a PhD course that begins in October of this year? You must have been looking hard to find evidence which contradicts that.
Do you get a nut from being obtuse, or are you just naturally dense? I suspect the latter. I not only do not see any evidence
that your arguments are carefully honed, i see a good deal of evidence to the contrary.
Quote:Quote:To the list of unsavory characteristics which you have displayed for us here, i guess i'll add an unwarranted conceit and an inflated egoism.
That's all fine by me. As long as you accept that I am a conceited, egotistical 21 year old.
I don't give a rat's ass how old you are, apart from the fact that you are over the age of consent and lust for little girls who are not.
You claimed that you write well and advance carefully honed arguments. I not only do not see any evidence for either contention, i see a good deal of evidence not to believe either contention. My remarks had absolutely no reference to your age, they were only directed toward the unwarranted conceits you entertain about your intellectual accomplishments.
None of this surprises me though, i long ago learned that you seem unable to follow a simple, coherent series of remarks, and to respond to them appropriately.
She says, as she quietly withdraws into the shadows with a grin on her face........
