9
   

Is it wrong to view child pornography?

NSFW Forums: Philosophy, Debate, Ethics, Addiction, Pornography
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
north
 
  1  
Fri 8 May, 2015 04:48 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:

The child is aware , but says nothing


How does the child know that pervs are sharing pics of them, jacking off to them? I have seen child porn (real stuff) on the internet a few dozen times over the years, stumbled onto accidently....how have I hurt the kids in the pics? None of those kids even know that I looked at them.


The child doesn't know that pervs. Are sharing their pics.

The thing is though , which is more important than anything else , is why these children are doing so ....

hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Fri 8 May, 2015 04:53 pm
@north,
Quote:
The child doesn't know that pervs. Are sharing their pics.

The thing is though , which is more important than anything else , is why these children are doing so ....

english version please
north
 
  2  
Fri 8 May, 2015 04:59 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
The child doesn't know that pervs. Are sharing their pics.

The thing is though , which is more important than anything else , is why these children are doing so ....

english version please


Abused and/or low self esteem
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Fri 8 May, 2015 05:02 pm
@north,
north wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
The child doesn't know that pervs. Are sharing their pics.

The thing is though , which is more important than anything else , is why these children are doing so ....

english version please


Abused and/or low self esteem


If I get shot in the head tomorrow I am not going to be anymore dead if someone sees a pic of me dead....the crime is the boundary violation, it is the child sexual abuse. Looking at evidence of a crime should never be a crime in a just society.
north
 
  1  
Fri 8 May, 2015 05:06 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

north wrote:

hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
The child doesn't know that pervs. Are sharing their pics.

The thing is though , which is more important than anything else , is why these children are doing so ....

english version please


Abused and/or low self esteem


If I get shot in the head tomorrow I am not going to be anymore dead if someone sees a pic of me dead....the crime is the boundary violation, it is the child sexual abuse. Looking at evidence of a crime should never be a crime in a just society.


Explain with more depth hawkeye
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Fri 8 May, 2015 05:12 pm
@north,
looking a pics of nakid humans should never be a crime. Only sexual touching without consent should be a crime, and of touching about all that should be criminal is penetration. Almost all of what is called child porn should be legal picture viewing.
north
 
  4  
Fri 8 May, 2015 05:17 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

looking a pics of nakid humans should never be a crime. Only sexual touching without consent should be a crime, and of touching about all that should be criminal is penetration. Almost all of what is called child porn should be legal picture viewing.


I disagree

The child has no idea what they are doing and what the consequences will be.
BillRM
 
  0  
Sat 9 May, 2015 06:29 am
@north,
Quote:
The child has no idea what they are doing and what the consequences will be.


A 15 or 16 years old "child" sending a picture to another teen or near teen and either or both of them should then be charge and label a molester for life?
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Sat 9 May, 2015 10:40 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
The child has no idea what they are doing and what the consequences will be.


A 15 or 16 years old "child" sending a picture to another teen or near teen and either or both of them should then be charge and label a molester for life?

remember, according the the feminist/state cooperative those under 18 cannot consent to anything sexual.
BillRM
 
  2  
Sat 9 May, 2015 11:59 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
remember, according the the feminist/state cooperative those under 18 cannot consent to anything sexual.


But that is not the law still in a great number of US states.
north
 
  1  
Wed 13 May, 2015 06:57 pm
@BillRM,

Its not about law or laws , its about empathy
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Wed 13 May, 2015 07:01 pm
@north,
north wrote:


Its not about law or laws , its about empathy


You can get all weepy and give away your freedom to whom ever you want, just dont tell me that I have to do it, and dont direct the state to come and take away my rights because victims and/or the victim industry do not want me to have rights. I am the equal to any and all victims.
north
 
  2  
Wed 13 May, 2015 07:04 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

north wrote:


Its not about law or laws , its about empathy


You can get all weepy and give away your freedom to whom ever you want, just dont tell me that I have to do it, and dont direct the state to come and take away my rights because victims and/or the victim industry do not want me to have rights. A am the equal to any and all victims.


You have to do it

And you are not equal to victims at all
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Thu 14 May, 2015 06:38 am
@north,
Quote:
Its not about law or laws , its about empathy


Empathy????? You mean it is being empathy to locked up or at least charge , almost at random, middle to late teens for their fairly normal and common sexual conducts?

When I was a teenager long long before digit pictures was available or CP laws was on the books, I remember the photo booths where you could have your pictures taken in private and developed at once before leaving the booths.

Dating teenage couples would love to go into those booths together with the girl sitting on the guy lap and have their pictures taken together for a few coins.

A vast percent of those pictures would now likely to be classify as child porn under our current laws.

I no longer have any such pictures but perhaps Kathy still have her copies of our pictures taken together so many decades ago.

Neither one of us was a victim!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
GorDie
 
  -2  
Mon 6 Jul, 2015 10:06 am
@agrote,
The atheists who were voted in By Pro-Homosexuality Voters are vying for Pro-pedophilia now.
The USA ousted as many Christians as possible in favor of Homosexuality, and they are factually trying to manipulate the legal system already to accommodate rich people ******* children.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 6 Jul, 2015 11:24 am
@GorDie,
The home of paedophilia has always been the church.
GorDie
 
  -2  
Mon 6 Jul, 2015 12:22 pm
@izzythepush,
only enacted by atheists in the church who pretended not to be.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 6 Jul, 2015 12:39 pm
@GorDie,
Don't talk ****. I know it's hard, seeing as you're some sort of religious bigot, but try not to. It just makes you look stupid.
GorDie
 
  0  
Mon 6 Jul, 2015 12:59 pm
@izzythepush,
alright.
People who were voted into the government because they said they would legalize homosexuality are not advocating to legalize pedophilia. And they are all atheists.

and any pedophile in the church was in fact an atheist posing as a Christian. FACT** according to definition of Christianity. You're not a Christian if you're a pedophile, nor a representative of the church. Only atheists are too bigoted to understand this. Denial of the Word of God = not a Christian.
gungasnake
 
  0  
Mon 6 Jul, 2015 01:17 pm
I have no use for perversions or perverts and have no problem with the idea that CREATING child porn ought to be treated as criminal activity.

But I have major problems with the idea that mere POSSESSION of ANYTHING ought to be illegal and the only exceptions I'd want to that rule would be things like anthrax, SAM missiles, enriched uranium and things of that nature.

I fear our government more than I fear perverts and there are too many ways in which any sort of pictures could be PUT on a person's computer without him even knowing about it.
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
The Void and the Absolute Oneness of the Universe - Discussion by Relinquish
can we reconcile darkness in man with madness(lunacy) ? - Question by studentnorway
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
In the GRAND scheme of things, what matters? - Question by komr98
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
How can something come from nothing? - Question by ripple
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is it wrong to view child pornography?
  3. » Page 38
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 05:49:10
▲ ▼