0
   

McCain, slings and arrows

 
 
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 09:27 am
McCain fundraiser's joke about rape resurfaces
GOP candidate postpones event in Midland after questions emerge


By RICHARD S. DUNHAM
Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle
WASHINGTON ?- An 18-year-old joke about rape told by 1990 Texas gubernatorial contender Clayton Williams has erupted as an issue in the 2008 presidential campaign, causing the man he is supporting for president, Republican John McCain, to scramble Saturday for damage control.

McCain's campaign late Friday said it had pulled the plug on a fundraising event scheduled for Monday at Williams' Midland home after reporters contacted the campaign asking about remarks made by the Texas Republican during his 1990 race against Democrat Ann Richards.

But Saturday afternoon, the McCain campaign told the Houston Chronicle that the Midland event had been postponed until this summer and would be held in a public venue.


Like a rainy day
McCain campaign officials changed plans after being contacted by reporters calling attention to Williams' comment 18 years ago seeming to liken bad weather to rape.

"As long as it's inevitable," Williams was reported as saying, "you might as well lie back and enjoy it."

Williams, 76, has made and lost fortunes in energy, ranching and other businesses over the past half-century, but is perhaps best known for his 1990 Republican race for governor. The Midland oilman's controversial campaign comments are widely known in Texas, but McCain aides told reporters they were surprised when they learned of them.

"These were obviously incredibly offensive remarks that the campaign was unaware of at the time this event was scheduled," said spokesman Brian Rogers. "It's positive that he did apologize at the time, but the comments are nonetheless offensive."

A representative for Williams declined to comment.


PR compromise
Items posted Friday evening on the the Houston Chronicle's "Texas on the Potomac" blog, along with Web pieces by ABC News and the Washington Post, triggered nearly 24 hours of sometimes-tense communications between the McCain campaign and the Williams camp.

Late Saturday afternoon, a McCain aide confirmed to the Chronicle that the Midland event had been postponed but had not been taken off the calendar. The compromise allowed McCain to say he had not held a fundraiser at Williams' house; it gave Williams an opportunity to say that the event he organized had not been canceled.

Stuart Rothenberg, publisher of the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report, said the recycling of ancient controversies reflects a new reality of politics in the Internet Age.

"This whole campaign is about destroying the candidate by destroying the surrogates," Rothenberg said. The trend "is enhanced by the Internet and the ability to do research on those connected to the campaigns."

Because attacks spread so quickly on the Internet, campaigns have adopted a new philosophy, he said: "If there is a hot potato, drop it as soon as possible."


Struggling for women
Saturday, Democrats were doing their best to make Williams as hot a potato as possible.

The Democratic National Committee demanded that McCain return all money raised by Williams ?- something the GOP candidate rejected.

"Offensive, disgusting comments like these cannot be tolerated," said DNC communications director Karen Finnery. "Sen. McCain's refusal to return the money Williams raised for him raises serious questions and shows the reality behind his rhetoric about running a new kind of campaign."

Cecile Richards, daughter of the late governor and president of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, blasted McCain for being ignorant of Williams' history.

"Clayton Williams' totally inappropriate remarks about women are well-known," Richards told the Chronicle. "Planning to host a fundraiser at his house is just another example of how out of touch John McCain is when it comes to women's issues. This is a major misstep for the McCain campaign, who is having a hard time getting support from women."

By Saturday afternoon, Republicans had launched a
counteroffensive. Republican National Committee press secretary Alex Conant blasted Democratic candidate Barack Obama's "campaign of hypocrisy and fingerpointing," pointing to fundraising for Obama by controversial figures such as former Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson and Jodie Evans, co-founder of the women's anti-war group Code Pink.


New rules

The latest controversy reverberated through the Republican state convention in Houston.

Delegate Loyce McCarter of LaVernia, near San Antonio, said McCain did not need to react to something that happened so long ago.

"That was unwise," she said.

But delegate Malcolm McGregor of El Paso said McCain was smart to steer clear of Williams.

"It just goes to show you some people have very good memories," he said. "Elephants never forget."

Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia government professor, said McCain's campaign should not have been surprised about Williams' past.

"Candidates should vet all the key people they come into contact with," he said. "They are lousy rules, but those are the rules."

Staff reporters Alan Bernstein in Houston and Bennett Roth in Washington contributed to this report.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 611 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 04:31 pm
Here are snapshots of some of these potential members of a McCain Cabinet, giving their PNAC profiles, their advisory capacities in the McCain 2008 presidential campaign, and their politics.

William Kristol

Robert Kagan

Randy Scheunemann

James Woolsey

John R. Bolton

Robert B. Zollick


Gary Schmitt


Richard L. Armitage

Max Boot


Henry A. Kissinger


That McCain has surrounded himself with such like-minded advisers who support the narrow PNAC agenda speaks to his unwillingness to hear and consider alternative perspectives. In fact, six out of 10 civilian foreign advisers to McCain are PNAC veterans. Even the newly appointed deputy communications director of the McCain campaign, Michael Goldfard, has been a research associate for PNAC. A die-hard adherent of the “unitary authority” of the chief executive, he recently stated that the framers of the United States Constitution advocated an “executive with near dictatorial power in pursuing foreign policy and war.”

Add to this list other major PNAC figures such as Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearle, Zalmay Khalilzad, and Dick Cheney who would probably play a significant role in a McCain administration and it is clear in what direction this nation would be moving.

A McCain administration would be likely to:


Invest incredible amounts of money in sustaining multiple, simultaneous wars overseas at the expense of neglecting pressing concerns at home, including the economy, health care, the environment and education.
Stockpile nuclear weapons, while seeking to prohibit its adversaries from having them.
Attempt to shield the U.S. with a multilayered missile defense system based on land, at sea, in the air and in space, while demanding that nations that are not its allies become sitting ducks.
Strive to develop more potent chemical and biological weapons—not to mention the genotype-specific variety, while at the same time claiming to be fighting a “war on terror.”
Legalize “Total Information Awareness”—going through all Americans’ phone calls, e-mail messages and other personal records without needing probable cause.
Take control of the Internet, globally using it as an offensive political weapon—while claiming to be spreading democracy throughout the world.
Dispense with checks and balances in favor of the “unitary executive authority” of the president.
Alienate nations that refuse to join our war coalitions.
Deny that there is (or can be) a United Nations.

A McCain administration would rule by fear, perceive right in terms of military might and subscribe to the idea of “do as I say and not as I do.” As a consequence, instead of rebuilding the image of America as a model of justice and civility, it would further sully respect for this nation throughout the world.

Elliot D. Cohen, Ph.D.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/page4/20080612_john_mccains_chilling_project_for_america/
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 09:58 pm
When the Republicans choose their candidate on September 4th, there is a very real chance that they could throw the election into an unexpected chaos as they pull a genuine September Surprise.

I think there is every reason to believe John McCain won't be the nominee. Ok, let me say that again. McCain will not be the Republican candidate in November.


Here's how it could happen:

At some point in mid August, John McCain will announce that he has decided that he can not accept his party's nomination for president. The reason will be health-related, and that may turn out to be the truth. Anyone who's seen him on stage these days knows he looks like he's about to keel over. And anyone who's been on a presidential campaign knows the physical demands are grueling and can be a challenge for a young man.

But excuses or facts hardly matters. He won't be accepting his party's nomination.

The reasons are simple. He can't win. Now that Obama is the presumptive Democratic nominee -- the polls all show that McCain's pro-war stance and Bush endorsement make him a lost cause in November. That combined with soft stand on litmus test conservative issues make him an unpopular candidate among the base. I know some Democrats that think the Republicans are planning to let McCain lose and 'sit this one out' so that they can hang the democrats with a bad economy and a war that is a morass. But that just isn't how they play. They play to win every hand -- think about 2000 with a popular Democratic president and good economy and a solid VP running for president. Why did they put up Bush? And why did they fight so hard? Because, you don't ever throw a game. And they're not going to throw this one.

McCain won't be the nominee.

By August, they'll have done something to try and pick away at Obama's popularity. They'll emphasis race, or whatever they can to get him to appear less than perfect. Then, they'll bring out of the woodwork a surprise candidate who can shift the story fast. With just two months before the election -- the new candidate will have little time to be 'vetted' but will be shiny and new, and will get a lot of media attention as Obama's newness will have become -- by then -- tarnished or at least no longer the surprise that it has been as he unseated Hillary.

So, who will be the Republican candidate that faces Obama in the fall?

I've spoken to a number of friends who -- when presented with this set of facts respond: "but they don't have anybody else." That's simply not the case.

Joe Trippi, campaign consultant and most notably Howard Dean's campaign manager, said of McCain dropping out: "While crazy, this may be the best shot they have."

There are a whole list of Republicans who in many ways are more likely to energize the Republican base. One thing is certain -- there are candidates that will play to the core issues in ways that McCain simply can't.

Here's a list of names. Some you know, some you don't. But each of them knows their name is in play. Among them --

Condoleezza Rice (Secretary of State)
Colin Powell (fmr Sec. of State)
Marilyn Musgrave (Colorado Congresswoman)
Mitt Romney (fmr Massachusetts Governor)
Mike Huckabee (fmr Governor of Arkansas)
Charlie Crist (Florida Governor)
Tim Pawlenty (Minnesota Governor)
Bobby Jindal (Louisiana Governor)
Mark Sanford: (Governor of South Carolina)
John Thune (Senator from South Dakota)
Dick Lugar (Senator from Indiana)
Chuck Hagel (Senator from Nebraska)
MIchael Bloomberg (NYC Mayor)



Ok, go ahead knock them down. One by one. See if you can really remove ALL these names from a list of candidates that are more likely to give Obama a run for his money. They'll come on the scene late, with a press corps that is looking for a horse race and a new story. Obama's frontrunner status will be upset, and there will be a set of variables that need to be calculated -- and tested against a weary electorate.

Is this supposition? Sure, but one grounded with enough history and observation to take it beyond conjecture and into the realm of the possible.

So -- before the Democrats go and game out how to beat McCain, it may be worth thinking about what happens when he says he won't accept the nomination. For the Republicans, a wide open convention would be both good theater and good politics.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-rosenbaum/when-mccain-drops-out_b_107236.html
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 09:08 am
Ramafuchs wrote:
Here are snapshots of some of these potential members of a McCain Cabinet, giving their PNAC profiles, their advisory capacities in the McCain 2008 presidential campaign, and their politics.

William Kristol

Robert Kagan

Randy Scheunemann

James Woolsey

John R. Bolton

Robert B. Zollick


Gary Schmitt


Richard L. Armitage

Max Boot


Henry A. Kissinger





She left out Dick Cheney.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 09:16 am
Edgar
Edgar, this Republican tactic is really possible. I think the replacement candidate would be Joe Liberman, who would switch to the Republican party.

What do you think?

BBB
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 09:21 am
I think you guys, with your conspiracy fantasies are beginning to make Ramadama (a lunatic bore) look almost sane. Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 01:35 pm
Question about supporter's ?'rape' joke agitates McCain
By David Edwards | Uncategorized | Monday, 16 June 2008

Three days after rescheduling a fundraiser that had been planned at the home of a supporter who joked about rape, Republican presidential candidate John McCain continues to face questions about why he is keeping the $300,000 raised by Texas oilman Clayton Williams.

At a press conference in Arlington, Virginia, CNN's Dana Bash asked McCain why his staff had even scheduled a fundraiser with Williams, who in 1990 joked that rape was like bad weather: "As long as it's inevitable, you might as well lie back and enjoy it."

The question visibly agitated McCain. He furrowed his brow, fidgeted with his notes, blinked rapidly, scowled, squinted, scoffed and grimaced as Bash was completing her question.

Finally he said, "my people were not aware of a statement he made 16 or 18 years ago. I've forgotten how many years ago it was."

McCain defended the decision to keep the money Williams raised, after Democrats hit him on the decision earlier in the day.

"The people that contributed are supporters of mine, not supporters of his, so when we found out that this was planned there, we said, ?'No, we'll reschedule it, and do it some place else,' and I understand that he's not attending," McCain said. "I don't, that's pretty much the sum of it all."

The Democratic assault on McCain's connection to Williams continued after the press conference, when the Democratic National Committee again accused him of hypocrisy.

"Instead of doing the right thing by denouncing Clayton Williams's widely known and deeply offensive comments about women, Senator McCain once again chose to put his political ambitions ahead of his principles. Williams' shameful history was readily available to anyone willing to do a 30-second online search," DNC communications director Karen Finney said in an e-mail. "McCain's silence on these comments, his willingness to keep the money Clayton Williams steered to his campaign, and the fact that McCain plans to go back and hold this fundraiser when he hopes no one is watching are all part of the reason the American people are seeing through McCain's image as a so-called ?'maverick.'"

Later in the press conference, a reporter asked about McCain's legendary temper, after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid suggested the Arizona senator does not have the "right temperament" to be president.

Although none of his specific, well documented tirades were mentioned, McCain responded as he has in the past when questioned about his sometimes excessive anger: He sidestepped the question.

"I have a very significant legislative record," McCain said, emphasizing his "record of bipartisan work" in the Senate.

McCain did not deny an anger management problem. Instead he tried to re-frame his anger as passionate frustration at a country headed in the wrong direction that shows he's in touch with the common man.

"Do I get angry from time to time?" McCain asked. "Americans are angry when we waste billions of dollars in wasteful pork-barrel spending. I was not elected Miss Congeniality in the United States Senate."

This video is from CNN.com, broadcast June 16, 2008.
link
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 04:54 pm
Re: Edgar
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Edgar, this Republican tactic is really possible. I think the replacement candidate would be Joe Liberman, who would switch to the Republican party.

What do you think?

BBB


Personally, I think the idea is ridiculous. Lieberman has this whiny voice and terrible persona. He was absolutely no help to the Gore campaign.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » McCain, slings and arrows
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/13/2026 at 10:50:59