0
   

McClellen, liberal media too soft on Bush

 
 
RexRed
 
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 03:42 pm
So what's up people? Do you really think you lefties ever gave Bush a pass on anything?

McClellen is not to be taken seriously...
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 865 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:03 pm
Liberals aren't satisfied unless ROTC buildings are burning.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:20 pm
Yes, like Lazarus, McClellen has come back from the dead now that he is free from the corruption and lies of the Bush cabal his heart is beating again. But indeed Mr Red it must be difficult for you to witness a fellow traveler born and bred of the right wing to see the light be it ever so slow in coming. For me I will just snort a line, smoke a doobie and have a double shot of wild turkey to celebrate the redemption of a human being (as much a human being as can be expected from a professional conservative)
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:24 pm
dyslexia wrote:
Yes, like Lazarus, McClellen has come back from the dead now that he is free from the corruption and lies of the Bush cabal his heart is beating again. But indeed Mr Red it must be difficult for you to witness a fellow traveler born and bred of the right wing to see the light be it ever so slow in coming. For me I will just snort a line, smoke a doobie and have a double shot of wild turkey to celebrate the redemption of a human being (as much a human being as can be expected from a professional conservative)


Lucifer, fell from grace... Judas also demonstrated how he could change is mind.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:25 pm
RexRed wrote:
Liberals aren't satisfied unless ROTC buildings are burning.


Oh, really?




On the question, I don't really know which of the powerful journalists are liberal, in the US sense of it, or middle of the road, as definitions vary, but it seems from accounts in the last day or so that there was a lot of rolling over going on, if not to Bush, to media employers.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:26 pm
SO WHY NOT LEARN FROM THEIR EXAMPLE REDDY?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:28 pm
like cotton candy

and just as cloying
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:31 pm
farmerman wrote:
SO WHY NOT LEARN FROM THEIR EXAMPLE REDDY?


Fire purifies, some are left with perfect spirits and some are left with nothing but dust.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:33 pm
There is no limit to the liberal media's bias...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:41 pm
Must have been Bush's cunning intellect and savvy. Put liberals in a room with someone smart and they are putty in your hands.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:43 pm
you are a vacuus Gomarite
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 04:46 pm
farmerman wrote:
you are a vacuus Gomarite


Smile
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 May, 2008 05:10 pm
FM I more agree with Augustine

Wiki excerpt:
Pelagianism was opposed by Augustine of Hippo, who taught that a person's salvation comes solely through a free gift, the efficacious grace of God, and that no person could save himself by his works.


Comment:
To imply that Christian salvation comes by our own works is unbiblical.

What works can a dead person do to please God?

Ephesians 2:1
And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

1Corinthians 2:14
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

James 1:23
For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass

Comment' The new born power "gift" within, is a means with which to do the work of the ministry of God.

Without this born within we do the works of the world instead.

The earmark of all christian deeds is love. Though love can often be hard and sometimes coarse as there are many levels of depravity.

Romans 8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God

Comment: Only the gift of holy spirit operating within can please God. Though the holy spirit resides within (and becomes the persona) the mind can still become attracted to the habit patterns of the old worldly ways.

Romans 12:2
And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

Comment:
This is where some divide the standards of liberal progressives from those who choose to follow a higher standard, the standard of God.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 May, 2008 04:47 pm
The leftists cowards are even softer on terrorists than they seem to think they were on Bush!!!!

Wussy, marshmallow wimps who will speak with despots (Pelosi/Carter in Syria) before they consult with US generals.

Soft soft soft!!!!

Being so self admittedly soft on Bush (notice the poll results) can we trust them to be strong on foreign policy?

NO!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » McClellen, liberal media too soft on Bush
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 03:49:33