1
   

Admiral Mullen issues 'warning' to troops

 
 
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 07:39 am
Military Chief Warns Troops About Politics
By THOM SHANKER
WASHINGTON ?- The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has written an unusual open letter to all those in uniform, warning them to stay out of politics as the nation approaches a presidential election in which the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be a central, and certainly divisive, issue.

"The U.S. military must remain apolitical at all times and in all ways," wrote the chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, the nation's highest-ranking officer. "It is and must always be a neutral instrument of the state, no matter which party holds sway."

Admiral Mullen's essay appears in the coming issue of Joint Force Quarterly, an official military journal that is distributed widely among the officer corps.

The essay is the first Admiral Mullen has written for the journal as chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and veteran officers said they could not remember when a similar "all-hands" letter had been issued to remind military personnel to remain outside, if not above, contentious political debate.

The essay can be seen as a reflection of the deep concern among senior officers that the military, which is paying the highest price in carrying out national security policy, may be drawn into politicking this year.

The war in Iraq has already exceeded the length of World War II and is the nation's longest conflict fought with an all-volunteer military since the Revolutionary War.

In particular, members of the Joint Chiefs have expressed worries this election year about the influence of retired officers who advise political campaigns, who have publicly called for a change in policy or who serve as television commentators on the war.

Among the most outspoken were those who joined the so-called generals' revolt in 2006 demanding the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, as well as former officers who have written books attacking the Bush administration's planning for and execution of the war in Iraq.

While retired officers have full rights to political activism, their colleagues still in uniform fear its effect on those trying to carry out the mission, especially more junior officers and enlisted personnel. Active-duty military personnel are prohibited from taking part in partisan politics.

"As the nation prepares to elect a new president," Admiral Mullen wrote, "we would all do well to remember the promises we made: to obey civilian authority, to support and defend the Constitution and to do our duty at all times."

"Keeping our politics private is a good first step," he added. "The only things we should be wearing on our sleeves are our military insignia."

Admiral Mullen said he was inspired to write the essay after receiving a constant stream of legitimate, if troubling, questions while visiting military personnel around the world. He said their questions included, "What if a Democrat wins?" and, "What will that do to the mission in Iraq?" and, "Do you think it's better for one party or another to have the White House?"

"I am not suggesting that military professionals abandon all personal opinions about modern social or political issues," Admiral Mullen wrote. "What I am suggesting ?- indeed, what the nation expects ?- is that military personnel will, in the execution of the mission assigned to them, put aside their partisan leanings. Political opinions have no place in cockpit or camp or conference room."

He noted that "part of the deal we made when we joined up was to willingly subordinate our individual interests to the greater good of protecting vital national interests."
link
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 707 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 07:56 am
"The U.S. military must remain apolitical at all times and in all ways," wrote the chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, the nation's highest-ranking officer. "It is and must always be a neutral instrument of the state, no matter which party holds sway."


I agree wholeheartedly with this statement.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:04 am
I think they should march on the White House and arrest the rogue CIC who abused his authority and lied them into war.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:15 am
blueflame1 wrote:
I think they should march on the White House and arrest the rogue CIC who abused his authority and lied them into war.


I understand your feelings on this, and, as you probably know, I share your assessment of the CIC. However, I do not believe that to be the function of the military. In the first place, not all of them would agree with that proposition, so, discipline and cohesion would quickly vanish. Disarray and confusion would cripple the ability to be effective on all levels.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:22 am
edgarblythe, the military is sworn to defend us against all enemies. Whether Bushie is an enemy of the state is debatable. The times are extraodinary so much so that a former NSA Brezinski warned the Senate Intel Committee of possible false flag terror attacks by the Bushie administration against Americans. That's an amazing historical happening.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:24 am
blueflame1 wrote:
edgarblythe, the military is sworn to defend us against all enemies. Whether Bushie is an enemy of the state is debatable. The times are extraodinary so much so that a former NSA Brezinski warned the Senate Intel Committee of possible false flag terror attacks by the Bushie administration against Americans. That's an amazing historical happening.


Agreed. However, the reality on the ground, among the troops, is not unanimous with your view.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:26 am
edgarblythe, I'm well aware of that.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:35 am
I know, but it had to be said. I would not be too upset to see GW Bush charged for his crimes. However, he will soon be leaving office. That's some consolation.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:39 am
Something spurred the Admiral into writting his letter. Allegedly there are Generals threatening to quit should Bushie bomb Iran.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:46 am
The top brass seems to be pretty restive over the situation.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 12:54 pm
"FOR THOUSANDS of Americans, Memorial Day will be a personal, intimate day of grief for loved ones who died in Iraq for a cause that was not deserving of them.

There is no more appropriate time for the rest of us to consider why so many didn't know then what they know now about Iraq. There is no more appropriate time to vow that, from now on,
the United States will heed the words of President John F. Kennedy to "never negotiate out of fear but never fear to negotiate."

That is the best way to honor our war dead"
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20080523_LET_S_REMEMBER_TO_NOT_START_ANOTHER_WAR.html
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 02:41 pm
Hi Rama.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 03:09 pm
Blueflame
Greetings.
Don't for get to read this speech.

http://yesmagazine.org/article.asp?ID=2640
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 04:38 pm
Rama, "For the super rich, if we run out of oil, there is always enthanol. Meanwhile desperate mothers watch helplessly as their babies die for lack of food."
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 05:12 pm
In my own opinion, due to certain constituencies feeling they must win this election, it is easy to conceive that some people in the media might be willing to interview active military personnel and feed them leading questions, designed to make the country's policies look negative.

So, since an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, as the saying goes, it makes a lot of sense to remind active military that the military takes orders from the civilian Commander In Chief, and it is not appropriate to comment publicly about what the Commander In Chief has the military doing.

This is done in all sorts of organizations; reminding personnel that it is inappropriate to comment publicy on what the organization is doing.
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 May, 2008 08:30 pm
When the military becomes active in politics kiss all your freedoms goodby. If we had a congress worth a dam they would exert control over the president. They have the authority but not the ba-ls.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Admiral Mullen issues 'warning' to troops
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/01/2026 at 09:03:46