0
   

Just how far will Hillary go?

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Zippo
 
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 02:45 pm
http://bp3.blogger.com/_3QqO8EXd-II/R_Xus34ROKI/AAAAAAAAP5U/w1a3p5YgtYI/s400/Hillary+gun.jpg

Martin Luther King anniversary stokes black fears of Barack Obama assassination. I wouldn't put anything past the Clintons!!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,140 • Replies: 18
No top replies

 
sozobe
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 02:53 pm
Oh good grief.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 02:56 pm
That's preposterous and highly unlikely!
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 02:59 pm
Zippo's the schmuck who buys into anything thats edgy. He cant help himself.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 03:18 pm
Re: Just how far will Hillary go?
Zippo wrote:
I wouldn't put anything past the Clintons!!


this part i agree with, short of murder, but only
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 03:52 pm
farmerman wrote:
Zippo's the schmuck who buys into anything thats edgy. He cant help himself.


Twisted Evil I have noticed this trend ...
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 04:32 pm
sozobe wrote:
Oh good grief.


Good Grief indeed!

Rolling Eyes Laughing
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 04:33 pm
I would put my money on Bush family killing Obama


I mean.. sheesh.. he IS black ya know
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 08:04 pm
Good grief indeed.
0 Replies
 
doglover
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 08:06 pm
You Clinton conspiracy theorists/haters are too funny! Laughing
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 09:36 pm
I thought there's talk of her bowing out very soon. Obama will be the nominee, and then lose to McCain.

By the way, with Obama getting so much money from many, many small contributions (via the internet, etc.), has he upset the proverbial apple cart for the Democratic party's usual workings? Meaning, if wealthy Democratic contributors are used to giving money based on who they prefer to be moved into the spotlight, has Obama's autonomy, by internet donations, alienated some of those historical contributors?

In other words, are there individuals that are aligned with the Democratic party that don't care for this independence of Obama? If he ran, and lost in the general election, would the Democrats "allow" him to run again? Why back a potential two-time loser?

Meanwhile, Hillary will likely be the next governor of NYS, and then she can run for President. McCain would have made her age, at that point, a non-sequitor
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 10:12 pm
Democrats don't seem to realize that it is Republicans who are funding Obama just like Ralph Nader. All his wins are in Red states. This should should raise red flags all over the Democratic camp.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 May, 2008 04:18 am
talk72000 wrote:
All his wins are in Red states.

Nonsense. He's won Maine, Vermont, Connecticut, Maryland, Delaware, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Hawaii, Washington state, Washington DC and he will win Oregon.

He's also, obviously, winning more liberals than Hillary in the primaries every time now.

In fact, ever since Rush Limbaugh started his campaign for Republicans to vote for Hillary, it's she who's been doing better among Republican cross-over voters than him.

Please...
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 9 May, 2008 07:16 am
Race Is All the Clintons Have Left

Now, faced with a mathematical mountain climb that even Stephen Hawking could not ascend, the Clintons -- and it is indeed both of them -- are just about to paste a bumper sticker on the rear of the collapsing vehicle that carries her campaign. It reads: VOTE WHITE.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-barnicle/race-is-all-the-clintons_b_100660.html
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Fri 9 May, 2008 07:31 am
shewolfnm wrote:



I mean.. sheesh.. he IS black ya know


Obama is not really a Black man, he is more of a Pecan Tan man.
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 9 May, 2008 10:58 am
farmerman wrote:
Zippo's the schmuck who buys into anything thats edgy. He cant help himself.


Dont you believe that Arab passports are stronger then tungsten/titanium and are able resist temperatures which can melt iron ? :wink:
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 9 May, 2008 10:58 am
Foofie wrote:
I thought there's talk of her bowing out very soon. Obama will be the nominee, and then lose to McCain.

By the way, with Obama getting so much money from many, many small contributions (via the internet, etc.), has he upset the proverbial apple cart for the Democratic party's usual workings? Meaning, if wealthy Democratic contributors are used to giving money based on who they prefer to be moved into the spotlight, has Obama's autonomy, by internet donations, alienated some of those historical contributors?

In other words, are there individuals that are aligned with the Democratic party that don't care for this independence of Obama? If he ran, and lost in the general election, would the Democrats "allow" him to run again? Why back a potential two-time loser?

Meanwhile, Hillary will likely be the next governor of NYS, and then she can run for President. McCain would have made her age, at that point, a non-sequitor


bull-sh!t Laughing
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 May, 2008 11:20 am
Zippo wrote:
farmerman wrote:
Zippo's the schmuck who buys into anything thats edgy. He cant help himself.


Dont you believe that Arab passports are stronger then tungsten/titanium and are able resist temperatures which can melt iron ? :wink:


That morning of 9/11, walking on Water Street right below Maiden Lane, I was first wondering what all the confetti in the air was, with some sheets of paper falling also. Then I wondered what the crowd at the corner was doing looking towards the west side where the Twin Towers were.

The crowd was looking at the flames coming out of the tower that was hit by the first plane. The paper on the floor was paperwork from the floors just above where that plane hit. One piece of paper was a travel voucher, specifically giving the company's name and floor location in the Twin Tower.

So, paper did survive the explosion of the planes. I was there, and saw it - plain photocopy paper, with no singe marks; must have just been blown straight out of the tower.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 May, 2008 11:30 am
Zippo wrote:
Foofie wrote:
I thought there's talk of her bowing out very soon. Obama will be the nominee, and then lose to McCain.

By the way, with Obama getting so much money from many, many small contributions (via the internet, etc.), has he upset the proverbial apple cart for the Democratic party's usual workings? Meaning, if wealthy Democratic contributors are used to giving money based on who they prefer to be moved into the spotlight, has Obama's autonomy, by internet donations, alienated some of those historical contributors?

In other words, are there individuals that are aligned with the Democratic party that don't care for this independence of Obama? If he ran, and lost in the general election, would the Democrats "allow" him to run again? Why back a potential two-time loser?

Meanwhile, Hillary will likely be the next governor of NYS, and then she can run for President. McCain would have made her age, at that point, a non-sequitor


bull-sh!t Laughing


The Zippo doth protesteth too much. I believe Obama has done a no-no. That is to prove a potential nominee doesn't need the party financial backers. I think this is the secret that no one wants to admit - Obama in effect, in my opinion, has done a "Miss Piggy" and, in effect, pushed his way into the spotlight in a most clever way, through independent fund raising. I would guess this will be corrected by party rules in the future. You see, political parties, as I understand them, function a lot like hierarchal religions; not like the denominations where anyone can get up and address the congregation.

Unless of course, this new mode of campaign financing, via the internet, is deemed good, so that many nominees can participate in future elections. The benefit? Increase voter turnout, and give the illusion that voters have a greater choice of candidates than they did historically under the previous campaign financing of the two party system. The system wins, the people are entertained. Bread and circuses.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Just how far will Hillary go?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 09:52:55
▲ ▼