0
   

DNC going broke

 
 
Reply Wed 7 May, 2008 04:30 pm
Quote:
In an election year marked by jaw-dropping Democratic fundraising, one key political player isn't so flush: The Democratic National Committee.

Despite record hauls by Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, the DNC has raised less than half the amount taken in by the Republican National Committee.

According to the latest Federal Election Commission reports filed through the end of March, the RNC had $31 million in cash on hand, while the DNC had only $5.3 million. The RNC has raised $36.5 million this year, while the DNC has raised $17.7 million.


If the dems are the ones destined to win and the party everyone wants, why isnt anyone giving them money?

Quote:
Among other things, the fundraising gap has left the Democrats' "coordinated fund" on empty. While FEC regulations allow for $19.2 million in coordinated campaign operations between the party and the presidential campaign, the party has yet to direct any money into that pot. The RNC's is already fully funded.


So the DNC cant help either candidate, no matter which candidate wins the primary.

Quote:
But in a worst-case scenario, the DNC official explained, the eventual Democratic nominee could burn through much of his or her primary election cash before the convention and donors might be less responsive to pleas for more money once the nomination battle is settled ?- leaving the campaign cash-strapped for a prolonged period before the convention, after which the separate general election funds can be tapped


Quote:
The sluggish fundraising might also inhibit so-called "hybrid advertising," which numbered in the tens of millions in 2004. Hybrid advertising is based on a loophole in FEC regulations, discovered and first exploited by the Bush campaign four years ago, in which the party and campaign can split advertising budgets
.

So the DNC wants to do now exactly what they condemned and attacked Bush for?
What happened to those high principles the DNC claimed they had in 2004?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10031.html
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 618 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 May, 2008 06:33 pm
Re: DNC going broke
mysteryman wrote:
If the dems are the ones destined to win and the party everyone wants, why isnt anyone giving them money?

The Democratic presidential campaigns have far outraised McCain's. The Democratic campaign committee for the Senate has far outraised its Republican counterpart. The Democratic campaign committee for the House has far outraised its Republican counterpart.

The DNC is the only exception.

Now the DNC's failure in fundraising raises interesting questions, of course - why is it falling back when every other Democratic entity is outraising their Republicans by miles? But the question, "why isn't anyone giving the Dems money?" is not one.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 May, 2008 06:43 pm
Everyone loves to hate the DNC - they do things which makes supporters of either side of our nomination battle unhappy.

The DNC needs to become a leader in the fight this fall. And there's a good way to do this: keep running ads like this -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6ul9iMgmOw

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 May, 2008 06:44 pm
I.e., these are the numbers for the DSCC (Senate Dems) vs the RSCC (Senate Reps):

Quote:
Democrats Widen Fundraising Lead for Senate Campaigns

Senate Democrats continued to dramatically outraise their Republican counterparts in the first three months of 2008, a differential almost certain to result in a huge spending disparity in competitive contests this fall.

From Jan. 1 to March 31, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee brought in nearly $17 million -- about $5 million more than the National Republican Senatorial Committee raised in the same time period. In March, the DSCC nearly doubled the take of its counterpart, bringing in $8.2 million to the GOP committee's $4.2 million.

Most troubling for Republican strategists is the growing chasm between the two committees' remaining war chests. The DSCC ended March with nearly $38 million in the bank, compared with $17.3 million for the Republican committee.


The DCCC (House Dems) vs the RCCC (House Reps):

Quote:
House Dems Outraise Republicans, Again

The month of March provided an eight-figure take for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), the political organization of the majority Democrats in the U.S. House: the DCCC collected $10.1 million last month, ahead of the $7.1 million raised by the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), according to reports both organizations filed Friday with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). [..]

By raising more and also spending less last month than its GOP counterpart, the DCCC widened its advantage in campaign cash on hand over the NRCC to $44.3 million to $7.2 million, a ratio of greater than six to one. The cash-rich DCCC will begin to spend these tens of millions of dollars this fall, primarily to air television and radio advertisements and publish mail pieces in districts in which Republicans are the defending party.


Obama vs McCain in terms of fundraising:

Quote:
Campaign finance: Mammon, McCain and Obama

Both parties' candidates were expected to raise such huge sums that they would find it advantageous to forgo the subsidy. But Mr McCain has not.

He has raised some $72m so far, but spent most of it winning his party's nomination. At the end of March his campaign had about $11.5m in the bank. Such sums are pocket change to Barack Obama, who has raised an incredible $235m. The junior senator from Illinois boasts $51m in cash, insignificant debts and a web-based fundraising operation that parts donors from their dollars at least three times faster than Mr McCain's operation can. And that is before Mr Obama has even clinched the Democratic nomination.


And finally, the individual candidates' own fundraising performance on the Republican and Democratic sides:

Quote:
GOP recruits show lagging fundraising

Several of the GOP's most highly touted candidates posted mediocre fundraising numbers in this year's first quarter, raising questions about their ability to seriously compete in races that were once at the top of the Republican radar screen.

The first-quarter fundraising period is often a make-or-break test for challengers. By April, candidates usually need to demonstrate they can consistently raise money to mount a credible race, or risk irrelevance in the months to come.

Businessman Steve Greenberg, running against Rep. Melissa L. Bean (D-Ill.), is perhaps the most striking example of a recruit failing to live up to expectations. Once highly touted [..], Greenberg is a candidate Republicans hoped could run a strong campaign against Bean [..].

But Greenberg raised only $113,000 for the quarter and is nearly broke, with just $5,000 left in his campaign account. By contrast, Bean has $1.35 million in her campaign account. Given the financial disparity, the prospect of Greenberg being able to run a competitive race looks dimmer by the day.

Another Republican fundraising disappointment was Lou Barletta, the mayor of Hazleton, Pa., who is running against Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski (D-Pa.). He raised $187,000 in the first quarter, underwhelming many GOP operatives [..]. Kanjorski, meanwhile, raised more than $453,000, giving him a nearly $1.9 million line of defense ?- well ahead of the $154,000 Barletta banked in his campaign account.

Another example is former California Assemblyman Dean Andal. Running against freshman Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-Calif.), Andal barely topped the $100,000 fundraising mark in the first three months of 2008.

And former GOP Rep. Melissa Hart has seen her quarterly fundraising totals trail off ever since she announced she was seeking a rematch against freshman Rep. Jason Altmire (D-Pa.), who defeated her in 2006. Hart raised only $143,000 in the quarter ?- well short of Altmire's $478,000.

To be sure, many Republican recruits posted strong fundraising numbers. [..] Former GOP Rep. Anne Northup raised $461,000 for her rematch against Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.), who unseated her in 2006. Yarmuth raised only $255,000, making Northup one of the few Republican challengers to outraise a Democratic incumbent this quarter. [..]

Targeted Democratic incumbents have also been amassing sizable war chests, however. With the exception of Rep. Michael Arcuri (D-N.Y.), every member in the DCCC's Frontline program has raised at least $200,000 for the quarter. [..]
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 May, 2008 07:42 pm
It's going to take a whole lot more money for Obama to make a dent in McCain than McCain needs to pummel Obama...much like it's taking Obama truck loads of money to squeak by weakling Hillary.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 05:04 am
Brand X wrote:
It's going to take a whole lot more money for Obama to make a dent in McCain than McCain needs to pummel Obama....

So how do you explain that even now, after months in which Hillary attacked Obama and the media revelled in Wright and bittergate and whatnot, and in which McCain was sailing through without any primary opponent, any concerted attacks from the Democrats (who were far too busy with each other), and any media scrutiny of note, McCain still hasnt been able to build any kind of consistent lead over Obama in the polls?
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 05:20 am
nimh wrote:
Brand X wrote:
It's going to take a whole lot more money for Obama to make a dent in McCain than McCain needs to pummel Obama....

So how do you explain that even now, after months in which Hillary attacked Obama and the media revelled in Wright and bittergate and whatnot, and in which McCain was sailing through without any primary opponent, any concerted attacks from the Democrats (who were far too busy with each other), and any media scrutiny of note, McCain still hasnt been able to build any kind of consistent lead over Obama in the polls?


The general will be quite different, still a long way to go. As long as Obama is seen as against Hillary he looks like the strongest candidate...once she's gone, if that happens, Obama will get a spike then it will fade as the general gets rolling.

Like you say up to now it's been Obama hype and the Hillary show.

A primary basically every other week.

MSNBC is already looking to the general and last night began the McCain/Hagee talk but it went no where. If that is going to be the media template then the Wright/Obama issue will be right back on the front burner driving Obama's numbers down deeper than ever.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2008 07:25 am
We'll see, Brand X.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » DNC going broke
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/04/2026 at 08:48:17