i agree. why should anyone care who other people love when infact it is none of their business
Call it a civil union or whatever, but don't fight the churches. They're just picking a battle to publicize their cause.
If was at a party with the women of A2K.... I would want every other man there to be gay.... and if a couple of the women were too.... well that would be okay too. :wink:
Should U.S.A. as a whole accept homosexuality?
Be aware that homosexuality is the attraction to the same sex
whereas being gay means more than just sex. Please not that Gay couples
can still love, parent, and care for children and each other.
Please be advised that the steroetypical remark of "Gay couples only
want sex from each other" is an incorrect/ignorant remark to believe as
there are many gay couples who are monagomous and believe in soul mates.
As for me, yes i do stand on the "we should accept homosexuals in society" because
1) Love is not restricted to just man and woman.
2) It will not do any of us harm to watch two men or women hold hands in public. Last time i checked i didn't go blind.
3) Homosexuals have the ability to work as well as heterosexuals and are not mentally retarded.
cjhsa wrote:Call it a civil union or whatever, but don't fight the churches. They're just picking a battle to publicize their cause.
Im going to get shot for this
but I could NOT agree more.
I absolutely understand the need to not be discriminated against.
I understand that peoples sexual behavior is NOT the publics business . No one needs to know who you are sleeping with and the fact that there are LAWS against certain sexual behavior blows my mind. I could not imagine what it would be like to live in fear of just being yourself due ot laws and other forms of blatent hatred.
But.. do people HAVE to pick loosing fights?
Just as much as the church has a right to exist with its rules, people have the right to exist with out it.
But simply because it is against "homosexuality' does not give people the right to attempt to pick it away.
Once the behavior of the church, its members, or the society it feeds becomes a problem then DEAL WITH THAT BEHAVIOR. But I do not think it is OK to try and disrobe the church simply because it does not 'believe' in something.
Why does the church not have the right to disbelieve... yet the gay community has a right to attack them for it and attempt to force them to believe or accept.?
People can shoot me down, pick apart my post or what have you.
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:If was at a party with the women of A2K.... I would want every other man there to be gay.... and if a couple of the women were too.... well that would be okay too. :wink:
it could start a problem if a gay guy starts hitting on you. =)