1
   

Aviation companies blame FBI, CIA and terrorists for 9/11

 
 
Reply Thu 1 May, 2008 11:52 am
The Associated Press Published: May 1, 2008

NEW YORK: Aviation companies sued by the families of Sept. 11 victims for failing to safeguard air travel are in turn blaming federal investigators ?- arguing the Federal Aviation Administration was not alerted that al-Qaida was poised to launch terrorist attacks.

In court documents filed this week in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, aviation companies are seeking to force five FBI employees to provide testimony that may help defend against claims the companies share blame in the attacks.

"The aviation parties anticipate that the FBI witnesses' testimony will demonstrate that the FBI had information before Sept. 11 indicating that al-Qaida may have been about to launch terrorist attacks on civil aviation, which it did not timely pass along to the Federal Aviation Administration," lawyers wrote.

The airlines and aviation companies are defending themselves against lawsuits seeking billions of dollars in damages for injuries, fatalities, property damage and business losses related to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack.

The companies in turn filed separate lawsuits against the CIA and the FBI last August to force terrorism investigators to tell whether the aviation industry was to blame for the Sept. 11 attacks.

The latest documents filed by the airlines, airport authorities, security companies and an aircraft manufacturer argue that if the FAA had known about an FBI investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks, it could have amended security measures to guard against the type of terrorist attack Moussaoui was planning.

The aviation defendants said the FBI has refused to permit even a single deposition, although the agency does not deny that five potential witnesses in the case have already testified and made other public statements before the 9/11 Commission, the Moussaoui trial jury and the media.

In the lawsuit against the CIA, companies including American Airlines Inc., United Airlines Inc., US Airways Group Inc., Delta Air Lines Inc., Continental Airlines Inc. and The Boeing Co. are seeking to interview the deputy chief of the CIA's bin Laden unit in 2001, and an FBI special agent assigned to the unit at that time. The names of both are secret.

The lawyers said testimony from both agencies was critical to their defense.

"After weighing this evidence together with the criminal acts of the terrorists, the jury would be entitled to conclude that any act or omission by the aviation parties was so dwarfed by the other causal factors of the attacks that the aviation parties' conduct was not a substantial cause of the plaintiffs' injuries," the lawyers wrote.

U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia said last year that the request for depositions with FBI agents was rejected because the aviation companies didn't explain how FBI information before the attacks would relate to their defense efforts.

Garcia said much of the information was protected from disclosure, "because it involves classified national security information or matters protected by the law enforcement investigative privilege."

He also said it would be "extremely difficult and burdensome" to separate the classified information from the non-classified information and risk that some classified materials may be inadvertently disclosed.

Yusill Scribner, a spokeswoman for government lawyers in the case, said there was no comment Wednesday.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 495 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2008 03:32 pm
Blueflame
I politely disagree with this article's charge.
Aviation company has got many friends.
And
Friends are like fiddle-strings, they must not be screwed too tight.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2008 04:06 pm
Rama, yes. But these lawsuits have divided them. The charges against the FBI and CIA are easily substantiated. Then there's Bushie who despite a torrent warnings acted like an accomplice. He said he felt no sense of urgency. His cohorts had said a new Pearl Harbor would help their cause which was war with Iraq, Iran and Syria.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 May, 2008 04:10 pm
Blueflame
I know your views thro abuzz.
Here is a nice exposure

"True to the American manner of meeting challenges and desiring to overcome them, a recent Time magazine cover led off with the title "How to Win The War On Global Warming" [1]. Accompanying that article, the UN Secretary-General demonstrated his Washington consensus credentials with a commentary titled "The Right War."[2] If the American history of war is to be considered, earth itself is in trouble. The "war on drugs" has been an ongoing fiasco, with billions put into various corners of the world mostly causing death and destruction between different factions killing each other off and - in the homeland - leading to the incarceration of millions of people - mainly black. The current global war on terror is also a moral and financial fiasco, expected to ultimately cost 3 - 5 trillion dollars just from Afghanistan and Iraq alone.
http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/17503
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Aviation companies blame FBI, CIA and terrorists for 9/11
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/15/2026 at 01:11:30