0
   

McCain Needs to Answer Questions about his PTSD

 
 
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 05:09 pm
The MSM is about to blow the lid off of this at last.

Declined to provide files three times to New York Times

A little noticed remark in the press is generating heat for McCain's presidential campaign.

On Wednesday, McCain's campaign told CNN that the Arizona senator's medical file would be produced May 15. Trouble is, they previously said they'd be released April 15, and they've refused to turn the records over to the New York Times on at least three occasions.

This has led some on the left to question, "What's he hiding?" -- as is the banner headline on the politics section of liberal blog, The Huffington Post.

"Mr. McCain has yet to make his full medical records or his physicians available to reporters," the Times veteran medical correspondent Dr. Lawrence Altman penned in March. "At least three times since March 2007, campaign officials have told The New York Times that they would provide the detailed information about his current state of health, but they have not done so. The campaign now says it expects to release the information in April."
McCain's previous encounter with skin cancer

The Times has taken issue with McCain's health before.

In early March of this year, the paper ran a Sunday splash titled "On the Campaign Trail, Few Mentions of McCain's Bout With Melanoma."

"Along with his signature bright white hair, the most striking aspects of Senator John McCain's physical appearance are his puffy left cheek and the scar that runs down the back of his neck," Altman wrote. "The marks are cosmetic reminders of the melanoma surgery he underwent in August 2000. Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, sometimes tells audiences that he has 'more scars than Frankenstein.'"

The recent ducking of questions on his medical history stands in contrast to his release of detailed files in 1999,

"In 1999, during Mr. McCain's first race for president, he gave the public an extraordinary look at his medical history ?- 1,500 pages of medical and psychiatric records that were amassed as part of a United States Navy project to gauge the health of former prisoners of war," Altman wrote in March. "This reporter, who is a physician, interviewed the senator's doctors in 1999 with his permission."

The CNN report was featured in a blog post on their political ticker Wednesday. It was not picked up by news agencies or even the subject of a CNN report. The Carpetbagger blog, however, caught the CNN blog post and raised a storm.
McCain said he'd release files on 60 Minutes

The Times report "was the standard line in early March. McCain sat down for an interview with Scott Pelley on 60 Minutes, and was asked about his health. McCain said it's 'excellent' (three times), and said his campaign would be 'doing the medical records thing' soon," Carpetbagger's Steve Bennen wrote. "Pelley followed up, "There has been some criticism that you have not released your medical records. You're saying in this interview that you're about to do that. McCain replied, 'Oh, yeah, we'll do it in the next month or so, yeah.'"

"For a candidate who has nothing to hide, he's acting like he has something to hide," he continued later. "And given that McCain is running to be the oldest president ever elected, and he has a history of medical problems including melanoma, this is a little unsettling.

"If McCain had a history of secrecy," he added, "it'd be easier to just chalk this up to a character flaw. But his previous disclosures actually make the problem worse. He was an open book during his first campaign, and now he can't even explain the delays in releasing his records.

"As I said," he concluded. "There's probably nothing to this. But the campaign's conduct on the issue raises questions, doesn't it?"
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 832 • Replies: 19
No top replies

 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 05:35 pm
Is this going to have the same impact that the Clinton tax records did.


People: "SHOW ME THOSE TAX RECORDS! What are you hiding?"

Clinton: "Ok, here they are, before I said I'd give them to you."

People: "Ok, thanks. Everything looks in order."
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 06:44 pm
Roxxxxxy wrote:
The MSM is about to blow the lid off of this at last.


The unseemly glee in this comment stains this forum.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 08:02 pm
The problem with this thread is it lets one's imagination run wild. And, imaginations can fabricate things that don't exist. I consider this thread just a loose thread that unravelled.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 12:30 am
maporsche wrote:
Is this going to have the same impact that the Clinton tax records did.


People: "SHOW ME THOSE TAX RECORDS! What are you hiding?"

Clinton: "Ok, here they are, before I said I'd give them to you."

People: "Ok, thanks. Everything looks in order."


Everything looks in order. Who the **** has said that? Of course, you might think political payoffs and bribes are in order for the type of politicians you support. Of course, most of ths falls on Bill. Hillary's campaign is in shreds qs it is.

The Clintons tax returns at this point merely raise a lot more questions at this point which can be discussed on another thread.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 12:31 am
Foofie wrote:
The problem with this thread is it lets one's imagination run wild. And, imaginations can fabricate things that don't exist. I consider this thread just a loose thread that unravelled.


The problem with your post is that apparently you think McCain is normal.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 12:33 am
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Roxxxxxy wrote:
The MSM is about to blow the lid off of this at last.


The unseemly glee in this comment stains this forum.


Too bad that facts bother you. Get over it.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 10:18 am
Why does it matter about a candidates personal medical records?
They have as much influence on how a candidate would govern as tax records have.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 10:38 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
maporsche wrote:
Is this going to have the same impact that the Clinton tax records did.


People: "SHOW ME THOSE TAX RECORDS! What are you hiding?"

Clinton: "Ok, here they are, before I said I'd give them to you."

People: "Ok, thanks. Everything looks in order."


Everything looks in order. Who the **** has said that? Of course, you might think political payoffs and bribes are in order for the type of politicians you support. Of course, most of ths falls on Bill. Hillary's campaign is in shreds qs it is.

The Clintons tax returns at this point merely raise a lot more questions at this point which can be discussed on another thread.


I thought that they utter silence on her tax records since they were released was a significant indicator that things are in order.

You have in fact started a thread on this...it's on page 2 and has not had a whole lot of activity. If you really had a lot more questions, I would have imagined I could have found them there....but alas, nothing.

http://www.able2know.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=114629
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 01:12 pm
ma yugo, if you think that there are no revelations to come out of the Clinton tax records, you are just flat out uninformed. I don't have time to deal with this as there are a lot more things going on in politics to follow as well as I am putting together a new show and rehearsing and writing ten-twelve hours a day.

Regardless of your feeble attempt to divert attention from the issue at hand, the mental condition of Sen McCain will be a MAJOR campaign issue. I notice that BBB has started another thread about this, which almost always happens as it seems like I am always way ahead of the curve on what is going on. Sometimes, it turns out there is only smoke and not fire, like the passport issue and there isn't any blockbuster headlines from the tax returns yet but I really believe this McCain mental health issue will be big.

Maybe I will be wrong but I doubt it.Time will tell.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 01:16 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Why does it matter about a candidates personal medical records?
They have as much influence on how a candidate would govern as tax records have.



Oh the Clintons now are suddenly squeaky clean when it comes to their financial dealings???


You will now admit that all the Whitewater stuff and the Hillary's option deals were just products of right-wing propaganda and COMPLETELY without merit?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 01:20 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Why does it matter about a candidates personal medical records?
They have as much influence on how a candidate would govern as tax records have.



Oh the Clintons now are suddenly squeaky clean when it comes to their financial dealings???

I dont know if they are or not, but if they arent they sure as hell wouldnt show it in their tax returns.
As long as they didnt break the law, then how much money they made is of no importance in the grand scheme of things.


You will now admit that all the Whitewater stuff and the Hillary's option deals were just products of right-wing propaganda and COMPLETELY without merit?


I dont know if they were without merit or not.
I didnt do any of the investigating.
I said it then and I will say it again now that I thought the whole investigation was a waste of time and money, but I wasnt consulted before the investigations began.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 05:05 pm
So you have reviewed the tax returns and are now willing to say that, as far as you know, the Clintons are above reproach. Yes or no?
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 07:23 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
Foofie wrote:
The problem with this thread is it lets one's imagination run wild. And, imaginations can fabricate things that don't exist. I consider this thread just a loose thread that unravelled.


The problem with your post is that apparently you think McCain is normal.


"Normal" is synonymous with "average." Yes, McCain is not average, since the average person can't take off or land a Navy aircraft on an aircraft carrier.

But, without innuendos, what is it that bothers you about McCain? You are aware that amongst a segment of the population, in today's politically correct society, testosterone is tantamount to contraband.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2008 08:03 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
So you have reviewed the tax returns and are now willing to say that, as far as you know, the Clintons are above reproach. Yes or no?


Above reproach?
I dont know that I would go that far, simply because nobody is perfect.

BUT, based on what they released, AND based on my limited knowledge of the tax laws, then I will say that AS FAR AS I KNOW, and I stress AS FAR AS I KNOW, they didnt break any laws.

Now, you didnt answer my question...
Why does it matter how much money they made?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2008 08:11 am
before this election campaign roxxxanne would have hissed and spit venom at anyone who even intimated that the Clintons were not squeaky clean.....now it's unable to do that because it supports Obama... it can only like or love one thing at a time and in order to love one thing it must hate all others.... more hilarity....

btw... I'm a misogynist.... might as well beat it to the remark.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2008 08:21 am
I can't believe this idiot thread has lasted this lnog . . .
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2008 08:42 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
btw... I'm a misogynist.... might as well beat it to the remark.


Let's not forget that you need professional help.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2008 08:46 am
but not roxxxy's kind...
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2008 05:22 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
before this election campaign roxxxanne would have hissed and spit venom at anyone who even intimated that the Clintons were not squeaky clean.....now it's unable to do that because it supports Obama... it can only like or love one thing at a time and in order to love one thing it must hate all others.... more hilarity....

btw... I'm a misogynist.... might as well beat it to the remark.


LOL

Roxxxxxxy is a lot of heat ( the kind that makes you feel clammy and uncomfortable) with absolutely no light.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » McCain Needs to Answer Questions about his PTSD
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/13/2026 at 07:23:56