0
   

I Guess They Will Have to Pry his Cold, Dead Fingers...

 
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 12:52 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
Individuals that are anti-gun are also anti-freedom and anti-American.


Shocked

What a load of...
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 12:56 pm
Obviously HO2_MAN knows more about water treatment than about freedom and Americanism...
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 02:44 pm
H20_Man, anti gun = freedom for those of us who don't want to be shot,
regardless if they're Americans or foreigners. We need gun control.
It's as simple as that!!

The few fanatics who ar pro-gun and members of the NRA will die off
and/or smarten up, whichever comes first.

Gun control advocates will prevail, please write that behind your ears.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 03:53 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
H20_Man, anti gun = freedom for those of us who don't want to be shot,
regardless if they're Americans or foreigners. We need gun control.
It's as simple as that!!

The few fanatics who ar pro-gun and members of the NRA will die off
and/or smarten up, whichever comes first.

Gun control advocates will prevail, please write that behind your ears.


So now you are saying that everyone that owns a gun is going to shoot someone?
I have owned weapons since I was 13 years old, starting with a 22 and I now own 2 rifles and 2 pistols.
I am now 46 years old, and in the 33 years I have owned guns I have never shot anyone, not counting when I was in the military.

I would be willing to bet that most people that own guns have never and will never shoot anyone, so your fear is totally unfounded.

But what it comes down to is this, the Constitution says I have the right to bear arms, so unless you want to repeal the second amendment you have no choice but to accept the fact that gunns are a part of America and nothing you will do can change that.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 04:56 pm
For the welfare of all people you just have to do away with it, mysteryman,
as the statistics do tell a different story.

Having said that, gun control is not equal to abolishing all guns, it means - as the name says - that anyone who owns firearms needs to be registered with
authorities before purchasing resp. owning any firearms. The ones who have
nothing to hide and claim to own it for personal protection only, should have
no fear from registering their name, serial number and make of the firearm
they own.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 07:24 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
H20_Man, anti gun = freedom for those of us who don't want to be shot,
regardless if they're Americans or foreigners.


That is security, not freedom.



CalamityJane wrote:
We need gun control.
It's as simple as that!!


But not gun control that violates our civil rights.



CalamityJane wrote:
The few fanatics who ar pro-gun and members of the NRA will die off
and/or smarten up, whichever comes first.


No, the NRA is millions strong, and will be defending America's civil rights for as long as America exists.



CalamityJane wrote:
Gun control advocates will prevail, please write that behind your ears.


No, the Constitution will prevail.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 07:26 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
For the welfare of all people you just have to do away with it, mysteryman,


Do away with what, exactly?



CalamityJane wrote:
as the statistics do tell a different story.


The stats show that gun ownership isn't a problem.



CalamityJane wrote:
Having said that, gun control is not equal to abolishing all guns,


Depends on who is saying "gun control". Quite often, the term "gun control" is used to refer to plans to abolish weapons that people have the right to have.



CalamityJane wrote:
it means - as the name says - that anyone who owns firearms needs to be registered with
authorities before purchasing resp. owning any firearms. The ones who have
nothing to hide and claim to own it for personal protection only, should have
no fear from registering their name, serial number and make of the firearm
they own.


I'm not sure if you are talking about licensing or centralized gun registration (or both), but the problem with either is that the government would use that info to go and violate people's constitutional rights. It is dangerous info for the government to have.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 07:31 pm
oralloy wrote:
It is dangerous info for the government to have.


Really? Do tell why it is dangerous?
0 Replies
 
hanno
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 07:35 pm
dlowan wrote:
hanno wrote:
Cold dead hands the first thing that came to mind? Then you're not viewing it in context. No one killed him to take his gun - he did his thing till the end - the day is his.

I despise this playground-rules crap - you'll call weakness weakness, in the sense that he's dead and that's bad for him, but someone wants to hold onto a little instrument of self defense and it's out of order.


Oh lighten up.

Anyone with any sense of proportion would see the "cold, dead, hands" bellow in that speech as intrinsically ironic and over the top......


What's "doing his thing till the end" got to do with anything? It was a dumb speech bound to get laughs at the time, and obviously his hands were gonna end up cold and dead at some point, just like yours and mine.

Nobody ever thought he was gonna die to defend his guns, and that was one of the things that made the phrase so ridiculous.


I thought that very thing. Not a damn Australian would apparently, but you've got the juevos to push your natives around just like we do. Hypocrites. There was no suspension of disbelief, I'd go for principle too - I mean, I'm not the altruistic type, but 'liberty of death' don't just mean try real hard for liberty.


dlowan wrote:
Wherever are you getting this nonsense:

"you'll call weakness weakness, in the sense that he's dead and that's bad for him"


Whoever called his dying "weakness"?

What on earth are you on about?


Death is weakness, if he were still a stud he'd be alive. I hope it takes me that long to get weak and while he had his **** together he did a lot of good. That's called perspective, liberals seem to lose it at convenient times.


dlowan wrote:
As for whether being dead is "bad for him" (a comment I cannot make any sense of at all in this context), I suppose a universal human fate can be regarded as bad, if one fears death greatly, but I see no reason to personalise this to Heston, especially as he died after a long life, which would seem pretty lucky given the fate awaiting many of us.


Perhaps you just can't appreciate black humour?


BTW, I would have found the "cold dead hands" thing just as ridiculous if I were opposed to gun laws. It was just plain laughable.


I was interested in hearing more about Heston than his gun nut stuff, btw.


You seem very fond of him, got anything interesting to say?


I bet you can see the universal human fate as being bad - but it takes big brass clankers to understand the inevitability of failure and continue in a meaningful manner. Heston had 'em.

I'm all about black humor - I just ain't enough of a bottom feeder to speak ill of someone who fought for the cause like I wish I could. I ain't just looking for graves to piss on and neither are you - you'd like to see American freedom in the same hole our man's headed for because it's existence makes you look like a pansy.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 07:35 pm
The government is not always the peoples friend.

Thank Jebus that little cj took a vacation... Rolling Eyes

RH

RIP Chuck...
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 07:38 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
oralloy wrote:
It is dangerous info for the government to have.


Really? Do tell why it is dangerous?


Because when the government tries to ban guns that people have the right to have, they use that information to track down people who own those guns.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 07:42 pm
Oh, aren't we a bit paranoid here? Actually, it is people like you that
make me want to pursue gun control even more so. Scary to think
that you own firearms. You are a danger to the rest of us!!
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 07:50 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
Oh, aren't we a bit paranoid here?


No. I've seen New York City and the State of California both use gun registration lists to violate people's civil rights, and I quite often hear people call to ban those types of weapons that we have the right to have.



CalamityJane wrote:
Actually, it is people like you that
make me want to pursue gun control even more so. Scary to think
that you own firearms. You are a danger to the rest of us!!


Support of freedom doesn't make me dangerous.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 08:17 pm
We all support freedom, but most of us don't need guns to do so -
I guess the gun control people are a hell of a lot more gutsy than you
sissies.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 08:26 pm
Jane, I own a gun, and many more folks you might respect more do as well.

Charley, nor lil' cj speak for the majority of us who have common sense...

Rock
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 09:23 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
We all support freedom, but most of us don't need guns to do so


Not everyone supports freedom. Those people who want to violate our gun rights hate our freedom.



CalamityJane wrote:
I guess the gun control people are a hell of a lot more gutsy than you sissies.


Support of freedom does not make someone a wimp.
0 Replies
 
hanno
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 09:25 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
We all support freedom, but most of us don't need guns to do so -
I guess the gun control people are a hell of a lot more gutsy than you
sissies.


Yeah, you're for freedom but you count what people need and what they're made of. I don't own a firearm either, used to have a reason to, but I preferred to have $200 freed up at the time. Still do, even though I'm no tougher and have more cash. I'm not gutsy - I just do what I've got to do - nobody else has to be anything for that to work out, but if they are something or other, God bless them.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 09:28 pm
Rockhead wrote:
Jane, I own a gun, and many more folks you might respect more do as well.

Charley, nor lil' cj speak for the majority of us who have common sense...

Rock


They speak for those who defend our constitutional gun rights.

Common sense is a rather vague term. Are you using it as a euphemism for "let's violate people's civil rights"?
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2008 09:44 pm
Go read some more, Jack.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Apr, 2008 07:19 am
CalamityJane wrote:
Oh, aren't we a bit paranoid here? Actually, it is people like you that
make me want to pursue gun control even more so. Scary to think
that you own firearms. You are a danger to the rest of us!!


Tell me this, do you approve of the DC PD's plan to go door to door, asking people to let them search their houses for guns?
They dont have warrants, they are "asking" people to let them search their homes.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 02:26:02