0
   

Polygamists: Authorities Prepare For the Worst in Texas

 
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:07 am
Fishin, do you know which standards of evidence, if any, the state must meet before it can separate parents from their children? Judging by the affidavit wandeljw posted, their evidence so far meets the "probable cause" standard, so the police can search and seize. I'm also pretty confident that they haven't yet met the "beyond all reasonable doubt" standard. So everybody on the compound is presumed innocent of any crime until convicted in a court of law.

What I'm not confident of is the thing in the middle. What standard of evidence applies before the state can (a) deprive parents of custody for their child, and (b) separate parents and children while it decides wheter to take custody from the parents?
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:21 am
The state does not need to convince a judge till June, they have lots of time to wait for the kids to say what they want to hear.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:23 am
Thomas wrote:
Fishin, do you know which standards of evidence, if any, the state must meet before it can separate parents from their children? Judging by the affidavit wandeljw posted, their evidence so far meets the "probable cause" standard, so the police can search and seize. I'm also pretty confident that they haven't yet met the "beyond all reasonable doubt" standard. So everybody on the compound is presumed innocent of any crime until convicted in a court of law.

What I'm not confident of is the thing in the middle. What standard of evidence applies before the state can (a) deprive parents of custody for their child, and (b) separate parents and children while it decides wheter to take custody from the parents?
While I'm not specifically knowledgeable about Texas statutes, most states (all?) have what is often called "Children's code" wherein such issues as custody/child protection/abuse/neglect are processed in a children's court or juvenile court which have a more lax criteria than "beyond reasonable doubt" and is usually "preponderance of evidence." From what I have read re this case, the procedure in effect is that there as been a prelim hearing and this will be followed up by an actual hearing of fact where both the state and the defendants present evidence.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:36 am
texas investigations
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:46 am
Quote:
Reporting
Rick Sallinger COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (CBS4) ― Texas Rangers were in Colorado Springs Wednesday as part of their investigation into a polygamist compound that was raided last week after a call from a young woman. A woman was arrested in Colorado Springs who may be related to the case in Texas.

The Colorado Springs police said Rozita Swinton, 33, was arrested for false reporting in connection with a February incident in Colorado. Investigators said Swinton had called them in February claiming to be an abused child being held in a basement.

A judge ordered the case sealed preventing other details from being released.

Officers said the Texas officials were there in relation to Swinton and her arrest.

There is no official word on what her connection might have been in the Texas case, in which hundreds of children were seized from a polygamist compound.

Someone claiming to be a 16-year-old girl called an abuse hotline in Texas claiming that her husband, a 50-year-old member of the polygamist sect, beat and raper her. Investigators in Texas have yet to locate the girl.

Published reports said Texas investigators traced that call to Colorado Springs.

The Texas Rangers would not comment on any possible connection to the Colorado Springs arrest.

Swinton was released on bond early Friday morning
http://cbs4denver.com/local/swinton.colorado.texas.2.702940.html

So where are we in America when the authorities can rip peoples lives apart on the basis of a obvious false report?? How long would it have taken for Texas to figure out that the call did not come from Texas, thus they had no creditable report of abuse thus no legal basis for entering the compound??
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 12:55 pm
CJ wrote:

I see no relation to this case
where you have solid evidence of young girls being mothers, being pregnant, suffering from mental abuse, having no (home)schooling, and being brainwashed by their religious fundamentalist old-geezer-husbands.


This is the problem....

What you are describing is public prejudice, not evidence. It is not backed up by any real objective evidence(and newspaper articles and critics backing public prejudice does not count as evidence).

When you are a dealing with an unpopular group, public prejudice is easily confused with evidence.

I will point out that similar claims about abuse and "recruitment" of children were made against homosexuals. There were the same articles, the same "scholarly" books and even the same testimony from "ex-homosexuals".

I am not comparing these two groups.... but I am comparing the public reaction to these two groups; people are accepting hearsay and unproven claims as fact without questioning whether they even make sense.

It is important for people to step out of the mob and take an objective look; both of this group and of the action of the officials in this case.

When people are dehumanized, it is very easy to just see them as monsters. This is a very simplistic view. The truth is often a whole lot more complex.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 01:35 pm
Can anyone define "brainwashing" for me?

Are we talking about what adults teach children? Are we talking about enculturation? Or, are we talking about some ritual process?

I am not looking for an emotional response. I just want an objective logical explanation of exactly what is being alleged by the term "brainwash".

((if I could only brainwash my kids to to clean their darn rooms...))
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 01:52 pm
ebrown, aren't all those young underage girls who have given birth to resp. are pregnant physical evidence enough for you? The mental abuse they're
suffering from being married to a man who could be their grandfather, isn't
apparent to you?

Do you really have to be a women to emphasize with this? I certainly
would hope not!

ebrown, I did see an interview on CNN the other day, where a woman who
escaped the compound was explaining how the abuse starts with babies
already. They were physically beaten and hosed down with cold water,
in order "to break their spirit" as the fundamentalist leaders put it. She
proceeded to explain how very young girls are "brainwashed" to obey
their leader or they would go straight to hell. They - girls and young women - were physically reprimanded and emotionally threatened.
This testimony is coming from women who lived through this torture and
somehow have escaped this hell.

Not enough evidence for you?
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 01:59 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Can anyone define "brainwashing" for me?

Are we talking about what adults teach children? Are we talking about enculturation? Or, are we talking about some ritual process?

I am not looking for an emotional response. I just want an objective logical explanation of exactly what is being alleged by the term "brainwash".

((if I could only brainwash my kids to to clean their darn rooms...))


You could brainwash your children to clean your rooms, but I am sure
you abhor the methods to do so, as much as I do. You only can brainwash
children with forced and mental abuse.

Let's not forget that none of these children were taught anything but
religious doctrines in its simplest form: you either do as I say or you're
damned and rot in hell. Physical reprimanding does the rest to make
these poor souls like putty in those bastards hands.

By the way, on CNN you also can see a video when Larry King interviewed some of the mothers and wives from the Texas ranch. They are all
brainwashed to the point, that they all claim to never have seen young
girls getting married to older man (King's question). When asked, all
the women look down and say the same thing - to their knowledge they
have never seen it.

After you have seen this video you will understand that these children
cannot stay with their mothers. The abuse will not stop there.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 02:11 pm
Calamity, if what you are describing is true, that is physical beatings and use of a water hose, then this constitutes abuse and these kids should be taken away. (Why the word "brainwash" is useful here instead of just calling it "violent abuse" is an interesting question).

Teaching "religious doctrines in its simplest form" is not "brainwashing" (or if it is, then there is nothing illegal about brainwashing).

You should not confuse these two since. Parents who do the first without the second are criminals. Parents who do the second without the first are not.

A woman giving an interview on CNN is not enough evidence for me. I don't give much weight to the testimony of "ex-homosexuals" or even "ex-catholics". As the hoax phone call shows... people say lots of things on television. Many things being said are raising my skepticism.

If physical beatings are common in this community (as is alleged) there will be objective physical evidence. If this is the case, I will change my mind since all I am asking for is objective evidence.

It will be interesting to see if this is the case.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 02:15 pm
Okay ebrown, since your the native speaker, I went and looked up
the exact explanation for "brainwash" and all webster could come up
with is the same terms as I used. So I am at a loss of explanation here.
Help me out, what's your take on "brainwash"?

Quote:
brainwashing

Main Entry:
brain·wash·ing Listen to the pronunciation of brainwashing
Pronunciation:
\ˈbrān-ˌwȯ-shiŋ, -ˌwä-\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
translation of Chinese (Beijing) xǐnǎo
Date:
1950

1 : a forcible indoctrination to induce someone to give up basic political, social, or religious beliefs and attitudes and to accept contrasting regimented ideas
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 02:55 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
Not enough evidence for you?

No, because TV interviews are not evidence. We'll be talking about evidence if the women repeat their testimony under oath in a court, as they may well do, and if the men they accuse provide unpersuasive testimony for their own side of the case, as they may well do, too. But not before. That's what due process is all about.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 03:34 pm
This news article from Friday gives a good summary of the evidence presented at the Thursday and Friday hearings.

Quote:
13-year-old in sect may have child, CPS worker says
(By BILL HANNA, April 18, 2008, Fort Worth Star-Telegram Staff Writer)

SAN ANGELO -- A girl as young as 13 may have given birth at a polygamous sect's compound, a child welfare worker testified Thursday night at a marathon custody hearing for 416 children removed from the ranch.

State Child Protective Services investigator Angie Voss said that at least five girls younger than 18 are pregnant or have children.

Voss' testimony concluded an 11-hour hearing that ended at about 9 p.m. The hearing will reconvene at 9:30 a.m. today.

CPS officials argued that all the children should be kept from returning to the YFZ Ranch. But lawyers for the children said the state cannot make such a sweeping generalization about all of them and should determine their fates case by case.

During the first four hours of the hearing, only about 15 minutes of testimony was heard as a crowd of lawyers appointed to represent the children lined up to raise legal points.

At one point about 20 lawyers stood in the center aisle of the courtroom to examine a single document. As they examined it, about 30 women from the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints sat in the courtroom in their old-fashioned prairie dresses trying to decipher what was taking place.

After each document was presented in court, it was then taken two blocks to San Angelo's City Hall, where more lawyers who were watching the hearing via closed-circuit television reviewed it.

Voss then began laying out the state's case for keeping the children in custody.

She said many of the girls told CPS caseworkers that no age is too young to marry and that it is their mission to have as many children as possible.

"There was a mind-set that when the prophet came and told them it was time get married, that was what they were going to do no matter what the age," Voss said.

Many of the girls were eager to begin having children and were thrilled to be living at the 1,691-acre ranch four miles north of Eldorado, she said.

"They said it was an honor to be there. They said, 'This is Zion,'" Voss said.

She has determined that girls as young as 13 have children, Voss said.

One 14-year-old and a number of 15-year-olds are pregnant, she testified.

Voss also described the circumstances of the April 3 raid on the compound.

She said she entered the ranch about 9 p.m. and was taken to a classroom.

Authorities were looking for "Sarah," a 16-year-old girl who had made several calls to a crisis hot line March 29 and 30. Sarah said she had been sexually abused and is the mother of a young child.

An arrest warrant named sect member Dale Barlow, 50, as the girl's husband. He was questioned by Texas Rangers in Arizona last week but was not arrested.

Sect officials first claimed that no one named Sarah lived at the ranch, Voss testified. Merril Jessop, the ranch leader, eventually started bringing young girls in for questioning by investigators.

After interviewing several girls, Voss testified, she learned that at least three teenage girls named Sarah live on the ranch and one of them has a young child.

But sect officials never produced the girl. After questioning more girls, investigators learned that Sarah had been seen working in the sect's garden four days before the raid. Voss testified that authorities still haven't located her.

As CPS caseworkers continued to interview girls that Friday, April 4, the tension inside the compound began to mount, Voss said.

Later that night, Texas Rangers told CPS caseworkers that they should suspend interviews because they couldn't guarantee the caseworker's safety.

Voss said sect members with night-vision goggles were perched in trees and on roofs. But, she said, she never saw sect members with firearms. She said she became more nervous when authorities moved a SWAT team and an armored personnel carrier into the compound.

"Things were getting very scary to me," Voss said.

The decision was then made to move the children out of the compound.
Initially, the mothers in the sect resisted, but Schleicher County Sheriff David Doran called Jessop and put the sect leader on a speaker phone.
Jessop told the women to let their children leave.

"They just stopped, and then they were cooperating," Voss said. "They even helped lead them to the buses."

As they continued to interview the children, caseworkers kept getting different names.

"They would give one name on the bus and another at the civic center," Voss said.

When asked if she believes that the children should return to the compound, Voss said they should not because the sect members do not believe they are doing anything wrong.

Earlier, Texas Department of Public Safety investigator Danny Crawford said investigators had found the "Bishop's Record" in the safe of sect member Richard Barlow.

The records detailed 38 families living in the compound and showed that one man has 22 wives. The records also showed that many men have underage wives. One 54-year-old man has a 17-year-old wife. A 46-year-old man has a 17-year-old wife and children ranging from 19 to 1 year old.

Crawford testified that it is difficult to determine which children belong to which mother.

The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints splintered from the Mormon Church when the latter rejected polygamy in 1890.

The group's prophet and leader, Warren Jeffs, has been sentenced to two terms of five years to life in prison in Utah for forcing an underage girl to marry an older cousin.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 03:38 pm
Right Thomas, that's not enough evidence, and I am not certain if this
woman is testifying at the trial. That's why I mentioned this in the same
context earlier

Quote:
ebrown, aren't all those young underage girls who have given birth to resp. are pregnant physical evidence enough for you? The mental abuse they're suffering from being married to a man who could be their grandfather, isn't apparent to you?


The underage girls who are pregnant resp. have given birth already are evidence, and DNA samples that are taken and are still taken will reveal whose child belongs to whom.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 03:44 pm
Wandel's report came in while I was writing my post.
Well, I guess that's enough proof for us who want to believe that these
children were abused and sexually exploited.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 06:00 pm
You are still missing the point CJ. I am only asking for you to take an objective look at both sides of the story before making up your mind.

You have only heard from the prosecution... and yet you have already passed judgment.

I haven't made up my mind about this story. Your opinion about this particular group, however hastily you have made it, may be right.

My concern is how we, as a society, treat unpopular groups in general. Passing judgment, and making drastic decisions, based on popular passions before hearing both sides of the story is just one example of this.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 06:16 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
Wandel's report came in while I was writing my post.
Well, I guess that's enough proof for us who want to believe that these
children were abused and sexually exploited.

No. What's in Wandel's report isn't proof. It's the prosecutors case. There's a major difference between the two in every country governed by law, not mobs.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 06:45 pm
Thomas wrote:
CalamityJane wrote:
Wandel's report came in while I was writing my post.
Well, I guess that's enough proof for us who want to believe that these
children were abused and sexually exploited.

No. What's in Wandel's report isn't proof. It's the prosecutors case. There's a major difference between the two in every country governed by law, not mobs.


It is even sadder when child abuse is not discovered until there is a pregnancy.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 07:09 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
You are still missing the point CJ. I am only asking for you to take an objective look at both sides of the story before making up your mind.

You have only heard from the prosecution... and yet you have already passed judgment.

I haven't made up my mind about this story. Your opinion about this particular group, however hastily you have made it, may be right.

My concern is how we, as a society, treat unpopular groups in general. Passing judgment, and making drastic decisions, based on popular passions before hearing both sides of the story is just one example of this.


ebrown, of course I pass judgment when an 50+ man is marrying young girls while relying on interpretations of their extreme fundamental polygamous "religion".
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 07:16 pm
Thomas wrote:
[No. What's in Wandel's report isn't proof. It's the prosecutors case. There's a major difference between the two in every country governed by law, not mobs.


No kidding, Thomas. Don't get carried away with the mob.
The pregnancies in young girls aren't proof enough for you, that's okay.
Others see it differently.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Are we really FwB? - Discussion by Idoxide
the dead end of polygamy - Discussion by askthequestions
Cult leader with 23 wives finally arrested - Discussion by Merry Andrew
polygamy a "minor" offense? - Discussion by dyslexia
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 04:32:35