0
   

Clinton Bashing Thread

 
 
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2008 08:14 am
I liked my idea. So, I will only make my anti Clinton posts here to keep from cluttering the other threads. Hopefully others will do the same.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 545 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2008 08:18 am
HILLARY FIRED? SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISBARRED!

We touched on this yesterday, and I'm told that we've received a mess-o-emails asking me to put something about it on the Nuze today. Ok .. so here we go with the abbreviated version of Hillary's shenanigans when she was working for the House Judiciary Committee during the Nixon impeachment mess. If you want the full story click here to read the column by Dan Calabrese.

Hillary Rodham gets a spot on the legal staff of the House Judiciary Committee upon the recommendation of a lawyer pal of Ted Kennedy.
The man who hires Hillary is Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat.
The House Judiciary Committee is investigating Richard Nixon with an eye on impeachment.
A question arises as to whether or not Nixon is legally entitled to counsel during the investigation. If so, his council would be allowed to cross examine witnesses appearing before the panel.
The concern about having counsel for Nixon cross examine witnesses centered on E. Howard Hunt. Democrats on the committee feared that Nixon's counsel would elicit information from Hunt that would be very damaging to the Kennedys.
Zeifman tells Hillary that Nixon is entitled to counsel. He cites documents in the committee's public file referencing the fact that Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas had representation four years earlier while he was being investigated.
Hillary removes the documents from the committees public file and places them under lock and key in her office where they are not available for media or public scrutiny.
Hillary then prepares a brief for filing with a federal judge which falsely states that there is no precedent for an official being investigated by the committee to have legal representation during that investigation.
Nixon resigns before Hillary has a chance to submit the brief in which she makes knowingly false claims.
Zeifman then fires Hillary. Hillary asks for a letter of recommendation. Zeifman says no. This was only the third time in Zeifman's 17 years with the committee that he had refused a letter of recommendation.
Zeifman told Dan Calabrese that if Hillary had actually submitted the brief she most likely would have been disbarred. We're trying to arrange for Jerry Zeifman to be a guest on the show today.

So .. all you Hillary fans out there. Here we have your hero once again hiding documents that could be damaging to her cause (Rose Law Firm billing records, Vince Foster's files) and then committing an unethical act in preparing a brief on a point of law she knew to be false. And you want this lady to be our president?

Oh ... and why haven't we heard about this before? It seems to me that the media would be interested in this level of dishonesty and unethical behavior by Hillary Clinton.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Apr, 2008 01:41 pm
http://cagle.com/working/080327/eagan.jpg
0 Replies
 
hanno
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 06:11 pm
Truth is an intrinsic quality whereas falsehood, in the sense that it is encountered is something people create. When you say the Dems will roll over and beg for votes and are more inclined to corrupt/illicit behavior you hear that it's all politicos (not really untrue) and at least the Dems don't start wars and take care of people (true, but unfortunately so, one must consider the need for action and the type of people).

What I mean to say is, you can see Hilly's fulla crap and Obama's the same thing in less astringent package. Whereas McCain, even if he can play the game (Keating-5 doesn't concern me and otherwise I've yet to hear any valid impeachment of his character/motives)has shown himself able hold together somekindof principles in the face of torture. I don't think anyone's angels, there could always be more integrity, but innocence is useless. The point being, McCain's a man of steel resolve, however you characterize it there is some truth/substance to him, whereas Hillary and Barack, for lack of any evidence to the contrary which is not much to ask for this kindof thing, seem merely to have the narcissism and obstinacy to declare themselves fitting leaders.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 06:13 pm
Betcha McCain goes senile first. Hes already drooling when he gives a speech.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Clinton Bashing Thread
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 03:07:04