The U.S. Constitition is fa, fa, fa foolin'

So who else here at A2K feels that Busma and Ramafuchs are a match made in heaven?

So who else here at A2K feels that Busma and Ramafuchs are a match made in heaven?

So who else here at A2K feels that Busma and Ramafuchs are a match made in heaven?

Green Witch wrote:

So who else here at A2K feels that Busma and Ramafuchs are a match made in heaven?

I DO, I DO, I DO!!!

Mysteryman
You are a matured American who uphold the compassionate views.
I know you thro' abuzz and kevin's forum.
Would you mind to organize a lovely trip to IRAQ?
I read all your views.
Both of us meet in bagdad?
Fix a date and show3 so9me Gandhian moral courage sir.

Roger
how about other members in this forum?

mysteryman wrote:

Green Witch wrote:

So who else here at A2K feels that Busma and Ramafuchs are a match made in heaven?

I DO, I DO, I DO!!!

We have finally found an issue that the conservatives, moderates and liberals can agree upon. My heart is full of hope for the future.

Ramafuchs wrote:

Roger
how about other members in this forum?

I'd be at a loss to determine which of you--you or Busma--is the goofiest of the two.

How can you be for the U.S. Constitution?

Hear me out before you answer: I'm not apart of foolin myself anymore and so should you not be either foolin yourself. It's like why have a constitution that looks and sounds nice and dandy, when it aint being followed? The things therein the U.S. constitution are intentionally made to have to be argued in court after a breach put intentioanlly arguable. One would have to argue in court a breach of their constitional rights since it was deceivingly put for being argued. Therefore I dont care for this U.S. constitution that's null and void even by the damn government that relies on you not having the funds to go to court an argue the arguable. If it takes your time and your money to make the constitution stand up for you, then it is all see-through bullcrap.

We'd be better off surely "by" (not under) another country's constitution or whatever they have if that country firmly stands by their's to every word without it having to be argued in some court, whether or not it's completely dandy and nice. Yeah, the U.S. need to drop it's ego and hand over presidential, congressional, and military authority to another country (Russia) as I revealed in another topic. That's right this would become former U.S. territory and be labeled Russia's New Russia.

Anyhow, an "arguable" Constitition is no damn good. Can any of you understand that yet? We need a clear put firm unarguable/non-negociable (sp?) Constitution that ppl and their government must stand by through the good, the bad, and the ugly no matter what. If it wont be like that then we'll fall for everything every time into a nation of corruption by the governement and for the government. And now here breeds ppl who turn corrupt in the judging eyes of the corrupt who just want to fight fire with fire in circomstances under their corrupt government.

Name me all the countries that dont have an arguable type consititution.

Argueable types leave leaway for corruption and misconduct and mistreament to drop upon persons before going to a court they shouldnt have to and after coming from that court as that stuff proceeds any ol way because no one is following a constition they can not follow since it aint clearly firm in standing. The truely crooked use that to their advantage.

So I say out with the argueable, in with unarguable. If you are still liking the U.S. constitution then you are the fool that must like endless arguments that can go different ways which bring about divid. Once you're apart of the division you leave yourself open to be conquered by the corruption that eats like cancer.